Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • L.A. to limit sale of nitrous oxide
    A tall white building, Los Angeles City Hall, is poking out into a clear blue sky. A person walking on the sidewalk in front of the building is silhouetted by shadows.
    A pedestrian is walking past City Hall in Los Angeles on Tuesday, July 8, 2025.

    Topline:

    The L.A. City Council voted Wednesday to ban tobacco and cannabis shops from selling nitrous oxide, a drug often called laughing gas or whippits. The new city ordinance will add penalties that include up to a $1,000 fine or six months in county jail if approved by Mayor Karen Bass.

    Why it matters: The FDA warns that inhaling or misusing nitrous oxide, which is sometimes used by dentists and medical doctors to sedate patients, can lead to serious health problems or death. Many community members say they have seen the drug’s recreational use become normalized. Among those who advocated for the City Council to approve the ban were several students from Bert Corona High School in Pacoima.

    “  I want to grow up in a community that's drug-free, where we feel safe just walking around, where this isn't just accepted as a part of everyday life,”  Mayra Rodriguez said during public comment at the City Council meeting. “We shouldn't have to grow up around this.”

    Other laughing gas bans: Local governments have banned nitrous oxide in places like Rialto, Huntington Beach, Santa Ana and unincorporated areas of Orange County. Gov. Gavin Newsom signed two bills last month that put statewide bans on nitrous oxide from being sold at retail locations, with added flavors or in containers larger than 8 grams.

    More context: It has been a misdemeanor under state law to knowingly sell or possess nitrous oxide for use as a recreational drug for more than a decade, but the state allows it to be used for things like medical care, vehicle performance and cooking.

    Councilmember Imelda Padilla, who introduced the motion that passed Wednesday, said the city ordinance will strengthen existing protections enacted by the state. She asked community members to report any cannabis or tobacco shops selling nitrous oxide to the City Attorney’s office at TEP@lacity.org.

  • The suit alleges they were illegal
    President Donald Trump speaks during an event on health care affordability in the Oval Office at the White House on Thursday in Washington.

    Topline:

    The Democratic National Committee on Wednesday sued President Donald Trump’s administration for recent television advertisements that promoted his political message while costing taxpayers millions of dollars. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, alleges that the ads are illegal government-sponsored propaganda and accuses Trump of personally directing them. It asks the court to declare the ads illegal and stop the use of federal funds to pay for them.

    The backstory: The spots, which began airing in September, already have cost more than $12 million to run, according to the media tracking firm AdImpact, and a total of $20 million in Homeland Security Department funding has been tapped to pay for them. Responding Monday to the criticism, Trump defended the ads as “positive promotion for our Great U.S.A.” but said he’d pay for them using his MAGA Inc. super PAC going forward.

    What's next: The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, alleges that the ads are illegal government-sponsored propaganda and accuses Trump of personally directing them. It asks the court to declare the ads illegal and stop the use of federal funds to pay for them. Trump has faced bipartisan backlash for the ads, which glorify him and echo his campaign pitch as voters cast early ballots with the midterm elections less than a month away.

    The Democratic National Committee on Wednesday sued President Donald Trump’s administration for recent television advertisements that promoted his political message while costing taxpayers millions of dollars.

    The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, alleges that the ads are illegal government-sponsored propaganda and accuses Trump of personally directing them. It asks the court to declare the ads illegal and stop the use of federal funds to pay for them.

    Trump has faced bipartisan backlash for the ads, which glorify him and echo his campaign pitch as voters cast early ballots with the midterm elections less than a month away.

    The spots, which began airing in September, already have cost more than $12 million to run, according to the media tracking firm AdImpact, and a total of $20 million in Homeland Security Department funding has been tapped to pay for them.

    Responding Monday to the criticism, Trump defended the ads as “positive promotion for our Great U.S.A.” but said he’d pay for them using his MAGA Inc. super PAC going forward.

    But on Tuesday, the fifth ad in the campaign began airing with the notice “paid for by the U.S. Government,” promoting Trump’s military actions in Venezuela earlier this year. The same day, Trump made it clear he hasn’t committed to reimbursing any money that has already been spent, telling reporters “we’ll decide.”

    DNC Chair Ken Martin said in a statement that Trump is misusing taxpayer dollars in “a last-ditch attempt to save Republicans in November.”

    “Americans deserve better than to have their hard-earned tax dollars used for Trump’s illegal schemes,” he added.

    Legal experts have suggested the ads run afoul of a federal statute against congressionally appropriated money being used for “publicity or propaganda,” and potentially other federal laws. The Homeland Security money tapped for the ads comes from a $175 million package Congress gave to the department as part of Trump’s immigration enforcement agenda.

    The White House has defended the ads as public service announcements akin to what past administrations have done to promote various policies. Legal experts have said the recent ads differ from many past public service announcements because they aren’t aimed at helping members of the public benefit from specific government programs.

    The defendants in the lawsuit — Trump, the White House, DHS and the Office of Management and Budget — didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

  • Sponsored message
  • Time to get your shot given 2026's trend

    Topline:

    The annual flu season usually starts in October or November. But this year, it looks like the flu started to pick up in early September.

    Why now: The timing of the flu season isn't the only thing that's odd. It's also unusual that flu activity seems to have started in Western states, such as California, Washington, Hawaii and Alaska, experts say.

    The backstory: It's unclear why flu activity would have started so early, and in such an unusual part of the country. But one clue might be a new variant that evolved a mutation, which appears to make it better at evading existing immunity, especially among teenagers.

    What's next: Experts suggest scheduling your flu shot.

    Fall has only just begun, but it's already time to start thinking about the quintessential winter bug: the flu.

    The annual flu season usually starts in October or November. But this year, it looks like the flu started to pick up in early September.

    "There are enough signs pointing in the same direction to make me think, 'OK, yes. This is the start of flu season,'" says Caitlin Rivers, an epidemiologist at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

    The percentage of people testing positive for the flu in the West has been rising steadily since around the beginning of September, she says. And the number of people showing up in emergency departments because of the flu has also been rising for weeks, she adds.


    "It's very uncommon to see flu activity rising this early. It's activity that we might normally see more like November or December," she says.

    The timing of the flu season isn't the only thing that's odd. It's also unusual that flu activity seems to have started in Western states, such as California, Washington, Hawaii and Alaska.

    "It typically starts in the South and then expands from there," Rivers says. "So two uncommon developments there."

    Rivers stresses that the amount of flu activity is still very low in most parts of the country. But that's starting to change as the flu picks up nationwide.

    It's unclear why flu activity would have started so early, and in such an unusual part of the country. But one clue might be a new variant that evolved a mutation, which appears to make it better at evading existing immunity, especially among teenagers.

    "That's our best argument for what's going on right now in terms of this early flu season," says Dr. Alex Greninger, a virologist who heads infectious disease diagnostics at the University of Washington. Doctors there are seeing as much flu right now as they usually would around Christmas, and the mutated variant appears to be common, he says.

    So Greninger, Rivers and others are urging people to think about getting their flu shot earlier than usual.

    "It's crucial that people get an influenza vaccine," says Scott Hensley, a virologist at the University of Pennsylvania. "And this might be a year that people might want to get a vaccine early."

    But the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention hasn't been promoting flu shots as it usually does. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who oversees the CDC, is a long-time vaccine skeptic.

    "It is disappointing that CDC is quiet given that flu kills of hundreds of kids a year and can result in tens of thousands of hospitalizations and tens of thousands of deaths," says Dr. Demetre Daskalakis, who resigned last year as the director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to protest what he called political interference at the agency.

    The CDC declined to make an official available to NPR for this story. In a statement, a CDC spokesperson said, "CDC is developing a communications strategy to provide clear, accessible information about influenza vaccination and other critical steps people can take to protect themselves during respiratory virus season. This includes information about the benefits and risks of vaccination to support informed decision-making."
    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • Actor-comedian shares rare photos from his life
    A photo of a man sitting at a dinner table, covering his face with one hand
    Photos from Jeff Garlin's debut photography book "Best Seat in the House: Moments No One Asked Me To Capture...But I Did Anyway"

    Topline:

    Actor-comedian Jeff Garlin has a knack for capturing moments in his life. His new photography book, Best Seat in the House: Moments No One Asked Me to Capture...But I Did Anyway, compiles some of his personal favorite photos of colleagues and friends. Garlin joined AirTalk, LAist 89.3's daily news show, to discuss it.

    Listen: to hear Garlin talk about playing Jeff Greene in Curb Your Enthusiasm, personal stories about his relationship with some of the biggest stars in comedy, mental health struggles and his feelings on analog and digital cameras.

    Check it out: Garlin has two book signing events in Los Angeles next month. He'll be at Book Soup in West Hollywood on Nov. 2 at 7 p.m. and at the Leica Gallery, also in West Hollywood, on Nov. 15. You can find more info on his book tour on his website.

  • Some call it a 'political stunt'

    Topline:

    The Trump administration last week only sent $500 checks to people who live in one of the 30 states that use Healthcare.gov for their insurance marketplace. They include people, like Allen, who were likely to be hard hit when Congress failed to extend the extra financial help put in place under President Joe Biden. The $90 checks that will be sent to Medicare beneficiaries are only going to certain people enrolled in Medicare Part B. People in Medicare Advantage plans, which are managed by insurance companies, will not get checks.

    Why now: The checks are hitting people's mailboxes just a few weeks before the midterm elections. The text of a letter sent along with the money touts the Trump administration's efforts on health policy and criticizes the Biden administration. "This reads like electioneering," says Kathleen Clark, a professor of legal and governmental ethics at Washington University Law School in St. Louis, Mo. "This reads as though it's intended to influence votes. That is prohibited by law."

    What officials said: The White House did not respond directly to NPR's questions about electioneering, whether the action is a violation of the Hatch Act or if it is a "political stunt," as Allen put it. "This is an out-of-touch criticism," Trump administration spokeswoman Allison Schuster wrote in an email. "Americans were overcharged for the operation of the Obamacare exchange, and President Trump returned their hard-earned money. This President will never stop enabling Americans to take control of their health by implementing policies that put money back in their pockets."

    Ellen Allen has mixed feelings about the check from the U.S. Treasury and letter from President Donald Trump that arrived at her house near Charleston, West Virginia, on Monday.

    "I just can't believe it; I mean, that's crazy," says Allen, who's the executive director of a small nonprofit called West Virginians for Affordable Health Care. She says, in her opinion, sending out these checks is a "political stunt."

    NPR first spoke to Ellen Allen in the summer of 2025. She was 63 years old at the time and knew she needed coverage from Healthcare.gov even as generous federal subsidies for her premiums were ending. She has a serious eye condition and needs expensive drops to preserve her vision. She advocated for the Republican-controlled Congress to extend the subsidies. It didn't. She ended up using retirement savings to pay $1,967 every month for her premiums from January through August 2026.

    Then her birthday came; she turned 65 and was eligible for Medicare. "I was ready at midnight — the first day I could apply, I did," she laughs.

    A second check on the way?

    Allen chose traditional Medicare, which means she could soon be getting another check from the U.S. Treasury. Last week, President Trump announced that $90 checks will be sent to 20 million people enrolled in Medicare.

    "The $90 is — I mean, that's just nothing," Allen says. In her work, she talks to people about healthcare costs all over West Virginia. "People aren't going to be fooled by this," she predicts. "People are hurting. People are feeling the cost of healthcare all year long."

    "If they wanted to do something meaningful, they would work on affordable healthcare instead of just sending out checks every now and then," Allen says.

    Both checks are directed to select groups. The $500 checks mailed by the Trump administration last week were only sent to people who live in one of the 30 states that use Healthcare.gov for their insurance marketplace. They also make more than $64,000 annually for an individual, which is too much money to qualify for subsidies. These are people, like Allen, who were likely to be hard hit when Congress failed to extend the extra financial help put in place under President Joe Biden.

    The $90 checks that will be sent to Medicare beneficiaries are only going to certain people enrolled in Medicare Part B. People in Medicare Advantage plans, which are managed by insurance companies, will not get checks.

    Can Trump do that?

    The checks are hitting people's mailboxes just a few weeks before the midterm elections. The text of a letter sent along with the money touts the Trump administration's efforts on health policy and criticizes the Biden administration.

    "This reads like electioneering," says Kathleen Clark, a professor of legal and governmental ethics at Washington University Law School in St. Louis, Mo. "This reads as though it's intended to influence votes. That is prohibited by law."

    Specifically, it would violate the Hatch Act, "the statute that prohibits using federal power and money to influence partisan political elections," she explains. It may also be a use of funds that's unauthorized by Congress.

    The money for Healthcare.gov enrollees is from fees insurance companies paid to participate in the marketplace, and the money for Medicare beneficiaries is from a general improvement fund. Neither of these funds has been used for direct payments to enrollees before.

    "It looks like a pretty desperate effort to, in essence, bribe the recipients of this letter to vote in gratitude to Trump in the upcoming midterm elections," she adds.

    An empowered executive branch

    The checks and letters are arriving in people's mailboxes, whether they're legal or not. Clark notes the Supreme Court has enabled Trump's illegal actions many times in the past. "So, of course, he feels empowered to go ahead and do this," she says.

    The White House did not respond directly to NPR's questions about electioneering, whether the action is a violation of the Hatch Act or if it is a "political stunt," as Allen put it.

    "This is an out-of-touch criticism," Trump administration spokeswoman Allison Schuster wrote in an email. "Americans were overcharged for the operation of the Obamacare exchange, and President Trump returned their hard-earned money. This President will never stop enabling Americans to take control of their health by implementing policies that put money back in their pockets."

    'Half a tank of gas'

    Some Republicans in recent years have advocated for giving more money directly to people rather than to health insurance companies, although the party has yet to settle on a particular approach.

    In any case, sending these checks is unrelated to that effort, says Joseph Antos, senior fellow emeritus at the conservative think tank American Enterprise Institute. There's nothing that requires people to use this money for their health.

    "From the perspective of the average senior citizen, when they get a $90 check, it's money," he adds, referencing the forthcoming checks for Medicare beneficiaries. "You can go out to McDonald's and buy probably two hamburgers and a shake for $90 [and] maybe buy a half a tank of gas."

    A widening trust gap, poll says 

    A few weeks from the midterm elections, voters say they are struggling with health costs and want candidates to address them, according to a poll released Tuesday by the nonprofit health research organization KFF.

    "The cost of healthcare is what's going to be front of mind as they're casting their votes in November," says Ashley Kirzinger, director of survey methodology for KFF. "And what we are seeing is that the Democratic Party has the advantage overall among all voters on which party voters trust to handle healthcare, but they also have the advantage among independent voters, and that's a really important voting bloc for midterm elections."

    She says there is "a widening gap" between the Democratic Party and Republicans when it comes to which party voters trust to handle health costs. "It was just a 10-point margin back in April, and now we're seeing it to be a 20-point margin," she says. The poll found 22% of voters trust Republicans on the issue, compared to 42% who trust Democrats.

    Where's the credit for GOP candidates?

    Antos, of AEI, calls the Trump administration's decision to send out these checks "inexplicable." He describes the move as politically strange, since a Republican administration that disparages Obamacare is investing more money into it, and "unreasonable from a fiscal standpoint," because of the growing national debt.

    He also notes that most Americans won't be getting these checks. "How about the average, lower-income worker who has employer coverage?" he asks. "They're not getting anything. Why is that? Is that fair?"

    He is doubtful the move will have a political benefit for Republican candidates. "For one thing, Trump is not saying that your local congressman did this for you, Trump is saying he did it for you," Antos says. "I don't get it, and I don't see any advantage to anybody, including Donald Trump."

    Despite her mixed feelings, Ellen Allen of West Virginians for Affordable Health Care is planning to deposit the $500 check she just received. "I'm not going to send it back," she says. "I'm going to put it in my health savings account and keep working towards healthcare for all."

    Copyright 2026 NPR