Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • First sentencing in Anaheim corruption scandal
    A man in a blue blazer sits on the back of a red convertible and waves toward an unseen crowd.
    Former Anaheim Mayor Harry Sidhu at the Orange County Black History Parade, Feb. 5, 2022.

    Topline:

    Two years after he pleaded guilty to federal charges, former Anaheim Mayor Harry Sidhu was sentenced Friday to two months in federal prison for his role in an Orange County corruption scandal linked to the sale of Angel Stadium. Sidhu was also ordered to pay a $55,000 fine.

    How we got here: In 2020, the Anaheim City Council approved selling Angel Stadium to the owners of the baseball team for $320 million. But the sale fell through two years later when federal investigators revealed that Sidhu shared “city-specific information” to the Angels’ owners that they could then use against the city in negotiations. He would later resign and plead guilty to federal obstruction of justice, wire fraud and making false statements to federal agencies.

    Other pending cases: The former head of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, Todd Ament, also pleaded guilty to federal charges for his role in the corruption scandal. He admitted to wire fraud, lying to a mortgage lender, falsifying his tax returns and other crimes. He now faces up to 30 years or more in prison, according to the Department of Justice.

    Former Orange County Democratic Party leader Melahat Rafiei, a cooperating witness in the FBI investigation into Ament, also pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud. Sentencing dates have yet to be set for Ament and Rafiei.

    What's next: Sidhu was not taken into custody immediately after the hearing in U.S. District Court, but instead was allowed to return Sept. 2, when he is expected to begin his sentence.

    Read on... for more about Sidhu's case.

    Two years after he pleaded guilty to federal charges, former Anaheim Mayor Harry Sidhu was sentenced Friday to two months in federal prison for his role in an Orange County corruption scandal linked to the sale of Angel Stadium.

    Sidhu, 67, was also ordered to pay a $55,000 fine. He was not taken into custody immediately after the hearing in U.S. District Court, but instead was allowed to return Sept. 2, when he is expected to begin his sentence.

    Sidhu was accused of soliciting a $1 million campaign contribution from the Angels baseball organization in exchange for passing them confidential information while negotiating the sale of Angel Stadium.

    He later resigned from his position as mayor and pleaded guilty to federal obstruction of justice, wire fraud and making false statements to federal agencies.

    Federal prosecutors had asked U.S. District Judge John Holcomb to sentence Sidhu to eight months in prison, a $40,000 fine and one year of supervision following his release. Sidhu's lawyers wanted three years of probation, a $175,000 fine and 400 hours of community service, according to court documents.

    Holcomb acknowledged that Sidhu had "breached the trust of the public," but the judge said the two-month term was appropriate given the ex-mayor's "significant" cooperation in the case, his admission of guilt, his age and his health.

    Background on the case

    In 2020, the Anaheim City Council approved selling Angel Stadium to the owners of the baseball team for $320 million. But the sale fell through two years later when federal investigators revealed that Sidhu shared “city-specific information” to the Angels’ owners that they could then use against the city in negotiations.

    In their sentencing request, prosecutors wrote Sidhu did not act in the city’s best interests and instead “worked behind the scenes to make the potential deal better for the Angels — and as defendant later acknowledged in a recorded phone call, did so with the expectation that he would receive a significant campaign contribution of at least $1 million.”

    Sidhu, prosecutors said, then deleted emails related to the stadium deal and lied when first questioned by the FBI, stating that he expected “nothing” from the sale.

    Separately, Sidhu also admitted to lying to the Federal Aviation Administration to avoid paying state taxes for his helicopter.

    “Defendant did not engage in this criminal conduct out of desperation, or addiction, or because he had no better options: he did so to further his own political ambition and to save himself a relatively trivial amount of money,” prosecutors wrote.

    Sidhu responds

    During the Friday hearing in Santa Ana, Sidhu was asked if he wanted to address the court.

    “I am ashamed,” he said.

    Earlier, he had written a personal statement to the judge. In it, Sidhu talked about his journey to America from India with $6 in his pocket and how he started work in America as a janitor.

    Sidhu eventually became an engineer and then a restaurant franchise operator. He was elected to the Anaheim City Council in 2004.

    “I have learned hard lessons from this experience, including disgracing my family and destroying my career and reputation,” Sidhu wrote.

    After the sentencing hearing, Paul S. Meyer, an attorney for Sidhu, said in a statement that he and his client appreciated the court's "thoughtful" hearing and the government's detailed investigation.

    “Harry has expressed his apology for his actions of email deletion,  mis-statements to the FBI and helicopter tax violations," the statement read. "Harry appreciates the broad outreach of support from those who know him well and respect his decades of public service.”

    Other pending cases

    Sidhu is one of several people charged in the corruption scandal.

    Todd Ament, the former head of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, pleaded guilty to federal charges for his role. He admitted to wire fraud, lying to a mortgage lender, falsifying his tax returns and other crimes.

    He now faces up to 30 years or more in prison, according to the Department of Justice.

    Federal prosecutors called Ament one of the ringleaders of a “cabal” of elected officials, political consultants and business leaders who worked behind the scenes to influence Anaheim politics. They said he laundered money meant for the Chamber of Commerce to his coffers in order to defraud a mortgage lender for a home in Big Bear.

    Ament is also accused of orchestrating meetings between power brokers to discuss public matters in private.

    Former Orange County Democratic Party leader Melahat Rafiei, a cooperating witness in the FBI investigation into Ament, also pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud.

    Sentencing dates have yet to be set for Ament and Rafiei.

  • The French Dip place says goodbye to a tradition
    philippe.jpg
    Phillipe's is saying goodbye to the sawdust on its floor.

    Topline:

    Philippe's, the L.A. French dip institution, is saying goodbye to an old tradition: sawdust on its floor.

    Why now: The Chinatown shop announced on social media today that it's sweeping its floor clean of the stuff because of safety and insurance reasons.

    The backstory: The granddaddy of French dips has been at its Chinatown location since the 1950s; the shop itself for more than 100 years. Philippe's response on the origins of sawdust notwithstanding, restaurants apparently scatter the stuff around to prevent slip, help soak up grease and for better traction.

    Phillippe's is known for its French dip sandwiches.

    But just as famous, many would argue, is the sawdust scattered about on the floor of the the century-old shop in Chinatown.

    The quirky signature even has (still) an entry on the shop's FAQ page:

    • Why is there sawdust on the floor?
      It is a tradition to Philippe's.

    Well, that quirk is no more. Philippe's announced Wednesday on social media in a "saw dust update" bidding goodbye to the tradition because of safety reasons.

    "After more than 100 years, the sawdust on our floors will officially be retired," the post reads. "While this wasn’t our decision, it was a necessary step to meet current safety and insurance standards. It’s a change we didn’t make lightly."

    The granddaddy of French dips has been at its Chinatown location since the 1950s; the shop itself for more than 100 years. Philippe's response on the origins of sawdust notwithstanding, restaurants apparently scatter the stuff around to prevent slip, help soak up grease and for better traction.

  • Sponsored message
  • District's art and archives valued at $12 million
    Two rows of wooden student desks face a dark green chalkboard. Tall bookcases stand against the wall. Posters and an American flag hang on the walls and a large wood table with papers on it appear in the foreground.
    The LAUSD Art & Artifact Collection/Archive and Museum at district headquarters.

    Topline:

    The nation’s second-largest school district is home to 389,000 students and roughly 100,000 pieces of art, including paintings, sculptures, maps and murals.

    More than classroom materials: A 2008 appraisal estimated the value was more than $12 million, according to a 2022 district document obtained by EdSource. Sure, the collection holds school records — classroom materials, photosyearbooks. But it also has ancient Mesopotamian cuneiform tablets dating back to 2100 BCE. Sculptures of “Don Quixote” by Salvador Dalí from 1979. A 1931 “Bugs Bunny & Friends” by the animator Chuck Jones shows Bugs Bunny, Wile E. Coyote, Daffy Duck and The Road Runner reading a book entitled “History of the 9th St. School.”

    Where are the pieces are stored: The collection’s roughly 100,000 pieces are scattered across LAUSD schools and administrative sites, with many being stored in a central warehouse at district police headquarters. Experts say it’s a rarity for districts to acquire and maintain such a collection. While LAUSD students might enjoy little treasures displayed on their school walls and in hallway display cases, it’s more challenging for members of the public to view items in the collection. Since 2018, a team of volunteers have created a database that can be viewed online for free.

    Read on . . . for photos and a database of LAUSD's art collection.

    Embarking on a treasure hunt for the art and artifacts held by the Los Angeles Unified School District is no small feat.

    The nation’s second-largest school district is home to 389,000 students and roughly 100,000 pieces of art, including paintings, sculptures, maps and murals.

    The art can be found in schools and district buildings across the district’s over 700-square-mile terrain. It is part of its Art & Artifact Collection, which began sometime in the 1850s and morphed into a multi-million-dollar collection today.

    Sure, the collection holds school records — classroom materials, photosyearbooks. But it also has ancient Mesopotamian cuneiform tablets dating back to 2100 BCE. Sculptures of “Don Quixote” by Salvador Dalí from 1979. A 1931 “Bugs Bunny & Friends” by the animator Chuck Jones shows Bugs Bunny, Wile E. Coyote, Daffy Duck and The Road Runner reading a book entitled “History of the 9th St. School.”

    The collection predates the official formation of LAUSD in 1961. The city was served by the Los Angeles City School District and the Los Angeles City High School District, which later merged. Most of LAUSD’s notable pieces are donations from alumni, former administrators and members of the larger Los Angeles community. A 2008 appraisal estimated the value was more than $12 million, according to a 2022 district document obtained by EdSource.

    “LAUSD history is Los Angeles history,” said Cintia Romero, the archive and museum’s curator and archivist. “We have all the people here; we have all kinds of buildings; we have all kinds of architecture; we have all kinds of cultures.”

    It is rare for school districts to hold on to such artifacts, says Brenda Gunn, the president-elect of the Society of American Archivists.

    “I don’t think it’s very common at all,” Gunn said. “I think what typically happens is that the school districts don’t really invest in any sort of preservation. It’s not often that a school district has an archivist, and if they do have any preservation efforts, it’s usually by a nonprofessional.”

    Treasures at school sites 

    School officials also collect items unearthed at school sites during renovations — such as old fire alarms — as well as yearbooks and photographs that document LAUSD history. Los Angeles Unified says it maintains “professional standards for archival care and are intended to ensure that important pieces of the district’s history are maintained for future generations.”

    “School district records are like a continuous public diary of shifts in neighborhoods, how the school district has approached its curriculum, how did it manage desegregation or any big social and cultural events,” Gunn said. She added that some might also be interested in viewing them for something more personal, like understanding family genealogy.

    There’s little the LAUSD archive turns down. The main criteria is whether the art can serve in an educational capacity or as a teaching aide, Romero said. While LAUSD does sometimes loan pieces out to other institutions, it is “not in the business of buying or selling artwork.” And sometimes, she said, selling wouldn’t be in the “spirit of the donors,” some of whom were the original artists.

    “It doesn’t necessarily have to be valuable to be accepted. It can be a teaching aid,” Romero said. “So, everything kind of has value, really. Everything can be somewhere.”

    And it is.

    The “X” on LAUSD’s treasure map sits in a warehouse at the school police headquarters in rows of boxes that house a large portion of the collection. That includes the district’s antiquity collection donated by Venice High School’s historic Latin Museum, which operated from 1932 to 1997, and is now defunct.

    In a small museum at the LAUSD headquarters on S. Boundary Avenue, there is a display mimicking a late 19th-century classroom.

    In the “classroom” are wooden phonics teaching tools with scrolling letters, antique maps and silver-colored vessels once used during home economics classes.

    The classroom has a list of “Rules for Teachers 1872” that sits on the front desk: bring “a bucket of water and a scuttle of coal for the day’s session,” take “one evening each week for courting purposes, or two evenings a week if they attend church regularly.”

    Preservation at schools 

    But it is among the modern-day classrooms with digital tablets and smart boards where the rest of the treasure lies:

    Typically, in most school districts, items just end up sitting idly by for years, succumbing to what archivists call “benign neglect,” Gunn said.

    “There are all kinds of places that this archival material will end up,” Gunn said. “And staff are like, ‘Oh, I don’t want to throw this away, but it can’t be in my office, so I’m going to store it somewhere,’ and then it stays there until the next person.”

    For Gunn, the hope is that school officials may take the extra step to preserve art, documents and history. Leaving something in a storage closet or in a box and walking away is not enough, she says.

    “You’re not hurting anything. You’re certainly not throwing things away, but you’re not helping this; you’re not improving the situation of the records,” Gunn said. “But, what you hope is that someone down the road will see them, open that door and say, ‘Oh, these are valuable. And, if we can’t keep them here, then maybe there is another archive that will take them.’”

    In the case of the LAUSD archive, there have been several thefts, including a painting at Dorsey High School. Romero said that while there aren’t many details of the painting, the president of the school’s alumni association has since found it, and traded $25,000 worth of posters and plans to leave it to LAUSD.

    Today, the district maintains that school security procedures, including key access, protect the pieces.

    Ensuring public access

    While LAUSD students might enjoy little treasures displayed on their school walls and in hallway display cases, it’s more challenging for members of the public to view items in the collection.

    In the 1980s, a formal inventory of art was curated. And in 2004, the collection was digitized, Romero said.

    So, since 2018, Romero and her small staff — made up of a volunteer and a small cohort of interns from Cal State Northridge and LAUSD’s Downtown Business Magnet school — continued to digitize items and add them to a public database, which can be viewed for free.

    This process of digitizing the archive is largely made possible by donations and grants, though Romero’s position is funded through LAUSD’s general fund, according to the district.

    But curating the collection isn’t just about LAUSD’s or Los Angeles’s past. It’s also about the future.

    Romero and her team also keep tabs on ongoing renovation projects at school sites that could reveal new additions.

    “We have so many schools, and each school has something,” Romero said. “Every school has some kind of history.”

    EdSource is an independent nonprofit organization that provides analysis on key education issues facing California and the nation. LAist republishes articles from EdSource with permission.

  • A nearly 100-year-old collection finds a new home
    Four women smile and stand in front of a bookshelf with books and a large poster on it.
    Miriam Matthews’ family members at the Baldwin Hills Branch Library.

    Topline:

    The Baldwin Hills Branch of Los Angeles Public Library is now home to a nearly 100-year-old Black history collection containing thousands of historical records and items.

    More details: The Dorothy Vena Johnson Black History Collection is named after the poet, educator and co-founder of the League of Allied Arts and contains 2,300 items including newspaper clippings, magazines, photographs, biographies, autobiographies, nonfiction, scholarly texts, multi-volume sets and about 25 rare items found only at the Baldwin Hills Branch, according to Jené D. Brown, the director of the library’s emerging technologies and collections division.

    Why now: The library held a ceremony Saturday where they unveiled the collection, whose origins date back to 1927 when Miriam Matthews, the first Black librarian employed by the LA Public Library, began documenting and archiving California’s Black history to ensure its preservation, according to the library.

    Read on... for more on the 100-year-old collection.

    This story first appeared on The LA Local.

    The Baldwin Hills Branch of Los Angeles Public Library is now home to a nearly 100-year-old Black history collection containing thousands of historical records and items.

     

    The Dorothy Vena Johnson Black History Collection is named after the poet, educator and co-founder of the League of Allied Arts and contains 2,300 items including newspaper clippings, magazines, photographs, biographies, autobiographies, nonfiction, scholarly texts, multi-volume sets and about 25 rare items found only at the Baldwin Hills Branch, according to Jené D. Brown, the director of the library’s emerging technologies and collections division. 

    The library held a ceremony Saturday where they unveiled the collection, whose origins date back to 1927 when Miriam Matthews, the first Black librarian employed by the LA Public Library, began documenting and archiving California’s Black history to ensure its preservation, according to the library. 

    “I’m glad it’s still being recognized and acknowledged,” Danielle Durkee, Matthews’ great niece said after attending the ceremony. “She always bought us books, she always had us involved in everything the library had to offer. So that’s what I was exposed to growing up.” 

    Baldwin Hills is considered a part of LA’s Black cultural hub and the collection will be more visible and accessible at this location, library officials said during the ceremony. But it’s not just about changing locations, it’s about protecting the legacy of Black stories and placing the collection within a community that will honor it the most. 

    “We have insisted that Black history is not a footnote but an essential and enduring part of the American story. This is why this collection matters,” said guest speaker Lura Daniels-Ball, president of the Our Author Study Club of Los Angeles. 

    A poster of a timeline with text that reads "Dorothy Vena Johnson. Black History Collection Timeline." It ranges from 1927 to 2025.
    The Los Angeles Public Library displays a timeline at the Baldwin Hills Branch Library outlining how the Dorothy Vena Johnson Black History Collection began nearly 100 years ago.
    (
    LaMonica Peters
    /
    The LA Local
    )

    The collection moving to Baldwin Hills was also an opportunity for the library system to recognize the people who were determined to preserve LA’s Black history for future generations. 

    “(Matthews) recognized that our shelves did not represent the communities she was serving,” City Librarian John F. Szabo told The LA Local. “She saw it as such an important thing to develop a collection not only of books and ephemera, but of photographs that told not only the history of African Americans in Los Angeles but of Black history from everywhere.” 

    The collection was renamed in 1971 and, until 2025, it was housed at the Vernon Branch Library on Central Avenue where Matthews once worked,  according to Brown, the library’s emerging technologies and collections director.  

    Heather Hutt, LA City Council District 10 councilmember, was also in attendance at Saturday’s ceremony. She told the crowd she used to work in the downtown library and that her family loves books. 

    “If you get a chance to really look at the collection, share that with other folks so they know what’s happening right here at the Baldwin Hills library,” Hutt said.

  • Nearly half a billion dollars unspent in LA
    A homeless encampment along an overpass. Blue tarps cover belongings, boxes and umbrellas are pictured. In the distance are tall skyscrapers and a freeway.
    More than half the money set aside by the city of Los Angeles for programs and services for unhoused people was not spent last fiscal year, according to an analysis by the city controller.

    Topline:

    More than half the money set aside by the city of Los Angeles for programs and services for unhoused people was not spent last fiscal year, according to an analysis by the city controller. In fiscal year 2025, the city left $473 million unspent.

    The analysis: Controller Kenneth Mejia's analysis, released Monday, found that the largest share of unspent money came from a state housing grant. More than $223 million in Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention (HHAP) grants, which are issued by the California’s Department of Housing & Community Development, have yet to be used. The HHAP grants are provided in multi-year rounds providing two-year windows for when they need to be used. That flexibility is part of what accounts for the delayed spending.

    Why it matters: Los Angeles allocates more than $1 billion to agencies and initiatives responsible for helping the city’s unhoused population, which, at about 72,000 people, is among the largest in the nation. These funds are intended to go to a variety of programs like emergency assistance for people facing eviction, substance abuse treatment and housing assistance, including shelter that can accommodate pets.

    What's next: Los Angeles City Controller Kenneth Mejia provided several recommendations on how the city can better account for its homelessness budget, including spending housing grants in the same year they are reported, better communicating timelines to the public for when affordable housing will be available, and to analyze the budgets monthly to identify issues faster. Most of the unspent money comes from special funds that roll over into the next year. But the discrepancy between budgeting in one year and spending another muddies the public’s ability to track how money is being spent on one of the city’s most pressing problems.

    This story first appeared on The LA Local.

    More than half the money set aside by the city of Los Angeles for programs and services for unhoused people was not spent last fiscal year, according to an analysis by the city controller.

    Los Angeles allocates more than $1 billion to agencies and initiatives responsible for helping the city’s unhoused population, which, at about 72,000 people, is among the largest in the nation.

    In fiscal year 2025, the city left $473 million unspent.

    These funds are intended to go to a variety of programs like emergency assistance for people facing eviction, substance abuse treatment and housing assistance, including shelter that can accommodate pets.

    The controller provided several recommendations on how the city can better account for its homelessness budget, including spending housing grants in the same year they are reported, better communicating timelines to the public for when affordable housing will be available, and to analyze the budgets monthly to identify issues faster.

    Most of the unspent money comes from special funds that roll over into the next year. But the discrepancy between budgeting in one year and spending another muddies the public’s ability to track how money is being spent on one of the city’s most pressing problems.

    “The large homelessness budget leads the public to believe that the city is spending much more on homelessness than it actually is, increasing the public’s expectations and causing frustration when results inevitably do not align with the budget,” Controller Kenneth Mejia said in a prepared statement.

    The city’s unhoused population has decreased slightly over the last two years even as it has increased about 18% nationally over that same time period. L.A. Mayor Karen Bass has taken credit for recent drops in the city, one of the primary issues she’s focused on during her tenure.

    Bass released a statement supporting the controller’s recommendations on how to better account for the funds.

    “We are committed to transparency so Angelenos will have a clear picture and understanding of how much is being spent in one year and what funding is supporting programs over multiple years,” Bass said. “It’s important that we strategically spend funding over multiple years to ensure we can sustain progress despite state and federal changes.”

    A spokesperson for her office told The LA Local that Bass has been committed to identifying ways the city can better address homelessness and supported the controller’s recommendations. But stopped short of providing concrete steps for what will be done next.

    “She’s been cutting red tape in City Hall from day one and will back any serious proposal to ensure every dollar the City spends is clear, accountable, and effective,” the mayor’s press office wrote by email.

    The L.A. controller’s analysis, released Monday, found that the largest share of unspent money came from a state housing grant. More than $223 million in Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention (HHAP) grants, which are issued by the California’s Department of Housing & Community Development, have yet to be used. 

    A spokesperson for the state’s housing department told The LA Local that the HHAP grants are provided in multiyear rounds providing two-year windows for when they need to be used. That flexibility is part of what accounts for the delayed spending.

    The second-largest amount was a little more than $99 million of unspent funds from Measure ULA, the city’s so-called “mansion tax” on property sales above $5 million. Those funds can also be retained and spent at a later date.

    2025 was the second year in a row that the controller found a pattern of underspending homelessness funds. About $513 million went unspent in 2024, of the approximately $1.3 billion in funds set aside. This spending is particularly difficult to track because it comes from an array of sources and is distributed across a variety of agencies.

    Mejia explained to The LA Local that tracking this spending was one of his priorities when he took office. His team created accounting codes, which hadn’t been done before, to better account for the money in various departments over several budget cycles.

    “Once we started tracking homelessness spending, we were able to find out that the city wasn’t actually spending anything close to what it was budgeting for homelessness – for two years in a row,” Mejia said.

    Councilmember Nithya Raman, who represents District 4 and is running for mayor, said the budget included money set aside for a homelessness oversight bureau she helped create, but has not yet been staffed.

    “Nearly a year later, not one staff member has been hired,” Raman said in statement attached to Mejia’s report. “Unless we are able to move with greater urgency to provide accountability to the public, Angelenos will lose faith that the city is spending these desperately needed dollars well.”