Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • A house that generates more energy than it uses
    A three-story house surrounded by lush greenery with a bright blue sky above it
    The Fortunato's Green Idea House in Hermosa Beach has a flat roof with a five foot overhang that shields the sun and cools the home.
    Topline:
    Robert Fortunato's "Green Idea House" has been doing that for over a decade. He remodeled his family's 1959 house into a 2150 square foot environmentally friendly home, and he says he did it for less than the cost of a traditional remodel.

    "It's one of the first net-zero energy, zero carbon case study houses that was built for less cost than standard construction," he says, and the remodel involved "standard construction materials and off-the-shelf technologies that anyone can use."
    What lessons can we learn?

    1. You'll need to get into the power business.

    2. There's lots of research and planning.

    3. You have to ruthlessly stick to your plan.

    4. You might have to update your plan.

    5. Don't expect everyone to follow your lead.

    Read on ... for more on how important these lessons are to making a green house.

    With utility bills rising faster than inflation, a house that produces more energy than it consumes might sound appealing.

    Robert Fortunato's "Green Idea House" has been doing that for over a decade. He remodeled his family's 1959 house into a 2,150-square-foot environmentally friendly home, and he says he did it for less than the cost of a traditional remodel.

    "It's one of the first net-zero energy, zero-carbon case study houses that was built for less cost than standard construction," he says, and the remodel involved "standard construction materials and off-the-shelf technologies that anyone can use."

    Shepherding such a project requires a lot of time and energy from the homeowner. There's research and planning, some stubbornness when it comes to working with contractors and suppliers and now some updates for a climate that's warming faster than expected.

    Still, Fortunato's family ended up with a stylish, contemporary, four-bedroom, two-bath home. While a project like this is not for everyone, Fortunato hopes others will learn from his family's experience and take on similar projects. In that spirit, here are five lessons from the Green Idea House.

    You'll need to get into the power business

    In planning for the remodel, Fortunato wanted to stop using climate-warming fossil fuels as much as possible.

    "We had just seen so many instances where the oil companies were not being responsible for the environment," he says.

    But reducing fossil fuel use was a challenge.

    "We had a gas hot water heater. We had a gas furnace. We had all gas appliances," he says.

    Disconnecting from the local gas company saved some money during the remodel because he didn't have to reinstall gas pipes throughout the house. And in replacing appliances, they chose electric ones, including an induction stove.

    To replace gas and to supply electricity in his home, Fortunato got into the power generation business. He installed 26 solar panels on the roof that generate all the electricity the house uses, plus enough for two electric cars.

    "We really haven't had an electric bill or a gas bill in the last 13 years," Fortunato says. He did have to pay $18,000 upfront to install the panels. He estimates his family saves about $4,800 a year in utility bills, so it took four years to recover that initial expense before the electricity became almost free (there are still utility connection charges, since he remains connected to the grid).

    Spending money on rooftop solar is not affordable for everyone, and the industry has gained a reputation for high-pressure sales tactics. NPR has reported on ways to protect yourself.

    There's lots of research and planning

    From the street, Fortunato's three-story, modern house fits in with the neighborhood of expensive modern and Mission-style homes.

    One of the features is the flat roof, which extends five feet over the front of the house. It hides the solar panels, which some consider ugly, so they can't be seen from the street. The extended roof has another purpose that saves energy.

    "Sixty percent of the energy that is saved, in terms of heating and cooling, is through that overhang alone," Fortunato says. In the summer, it shades the southwest-facing house when the sun is higher in the sky. "And then in the wintertime, the sun rises low in the sky across the horizon. And the sun goes into the windows and actually heats up the house for free."

    Taking advantage of a home's location and then planning construction in this way takes research and planning. Fortunato says the concept he employed is an ancient one, adopted from Indigenous cliff dwellings in what is now Mesa Verde National Park in Colorado.

    On the other side of the country, the Harvard Center for Green Buildings and Cities (CGBC) employs the concept for its HouseZero office in Cambridge, Mass. They are adapted for that location with fins that shade the windows.

    "Rather than horizontal overhangs, those are vertical ones to allow the control of the sun on the east and west, where the sun is lower in the sky," says Ali Malkawi, professor of architectural technology and director of the CGBC.

    The HouseZero functions as both a laboratory and the CGBC headquarters. The building "contains several miles of wire and hundreds of sensors," but he says this high-tech part has to be paired with good design.

    "You cannot apply a technology in a building that is not designed well, that's taking into consideration all these simple principles that we knew for hundreds and hundreds of years," Malkawi says.

    In the Green Idea House, one example of this is an open stairway that doubles as a "thermal chimney." It keeps the house cool without air conditioning and saves more energy.

    "We kick open the two vented windows at the top of the chimney, and the hot air just naturally evacuates," Fortunato says.

    Hermosa Beach's celebrated mild climate contributes to the success of technologies like this. Fortunato says a house in a place with more extreme weather likely would have to deploy other measures to keep it comfortable.

    In planning this remodel, Fortunato also tried to avoid the need for electric lighting during the day.

    "If the sun is out, we actually don't need to turn on any of the lights in the house, in any of the rooms," he says. Several skylights bring light inside, and in the evening, efficient LED lighting helps reduce electricity consumption.

    You have to ruthlessly stick to your plan

    Using LED light bulbs is a relatively easy solution that most Americans have adopted, as the lighting industry also switched to the energy-sipping technology. But other features of the Green Idea House do not have consumer momentum and industries working in their favor. Pursuing them required Fortunato to remind contractors and suppliers of his goals to make sure they're achieved.

    For example, the brown metal siding on the house was selected because it was made in a nearby factory in Fontana. Fortunato wanted to avoid burning fossil fuels to have it delivered across the country.

    At the end of the ordering process, he confirmed with the supplier that the siding would come from the local factory.

    "And then he said, 'Well, no, you ordered a color brown that only Texas makes,'" Fortunato told NPR, with some exasperation. He asked what colors come from Fontana. "And it was very similar. And we said, 'Let's go with that.'"

    Fortunato also "replaced an old garage door opener that used 15 watts just sitting there continuously." The new one uses about 80% less electricity, waiting to sense when someone pushes the button. It's a small savings but important to Fortunato.

    It's important to figure out your goals and question motivations to make sure the goals are actually accomplished, says Chris Magwood with the clean energy nonprofit group Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI).

    "Having me as a consultant is like having that annoying 2-year-old in your house because I just go, why? Like, why a solar house?" says Magwood, who wrote a book about designing more efficient houses.

    He says if choosing solar is about the environment, rooftop solar panels make more sense for homeowners in states that burn a lot of coal for electricity, such as West Virginia. But they may not make as much sense in a state that gets most of its power from cleaner sources, such as California.

    Magwood says constructing an efficient home takes a lot of time and dedication, though he says it's getting easier with certification programs like Energy Star and LEED. They ensure contractors and manufacturers meet efficiency standards.

    You might have to update your plan

    When Fortunato began remodeling his house 15 years ago, some of the technology that's common now was just starting to be sold. That includes heat pump water heaters, which save energy by moving heat from one place to another instead creating heat with an element or flame.

    Fortunato installed two of these efficient water heaters — one for hot water and another to supply radiators that heat the home — in his garage, which gets plenty of heat from the sun. But he says contractors treated the concept like "science fiction."

    "They gave me quotes for five or six times what it should cost to actually install the thing. They were estimating their learning curve, and they wanted to charge me for it," he says. So, he had to explain how the water heaters worked.

    Fortunato designed the house without air conditioning to save energy. He assumed the climate would warm about four degrees Fahrenheit over the life of the house.

    "I think we've already broken that threshold," he says. Scientists do say temperatures have been rising faster than projected. So, he installed shades on the skylights to reduce the temperature in the house. "And we might go to a very small air conditioning unit if, in fact, we need it."

    Fortunato is learning that as humans continue burning the fossil fuels that heat the climate, he has to make other adjustments, like regularly washing off his solar panels.

    "We live on a busy street, and all of the carbon-burning cars deposit this layer of black soot that needs to be cleaned off the solar panels," Fortunato says. "It's so ironic, right? The thing we're trying to fight actually is depositing this thing that reduces the production of the solar panels."

    Don't expect everyone to follow your lead

    Fortunato and his family hoped their experience would encourage others to build their own Green Idea House.

    "We wanted to make the house something that anyone would want to live in," he says, so they tried to strike a balance between affordable and attractive. That was after seeing some efficient homes that he says looked like "spaceships" and "mud huts."

    The family has offered to share what they learned, led many tours through the home and even hosted a reality show to spread the word.

    But houses like this that produce more energy than they use still are just a fraction of a percent of the 140 million housing units in the country. Fortunato says that's "very disappointing." Ultimately he hopes the money his family saves will help convince others to build homes like his.

    "Just rough math, about $200 a month for the house and about $100 each for the cars," Fortunato says. That's $400 a month in utility and gasoline savings that could keep adding up, 15 years after the Green Idea House was finished.

  • District must now provide 'high dosage' tutoring
    A classroom at Carson Street Elementary. There are 15 visible third grade students sitting at desks. The walls are a cream color. There is a corkboard with letters that spell out "Mindset Matters" and depictions of cursive letters lining the wall.
    A classroom at Carson Street Elementary.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles Unified School District is officially on the hook for providing high-dosage tutoring to students after a judge approved a settlement reached last fall.

    About the settlement: After being accused of denying students their right to equitable education during pandemic shutdowns, the district must now provide 100,000 students — more than a quarter of the district’s TK-12 students — with three years of high-dosage tutoring under a court-approved settlement, amounting to more than 10 million hours. The tutoring mandate stems from a lawsuit filed during the Covid-19 pandemic that alleged that only 60% of the district’s students participated in virtual instruction during the spring 2020 semester, denying them “basic educational equality guaranteed to them by the California Constitution.”

    What's next: More than a quarter of the district’s TK-12 students will receive a mix of virtual and in-person sessions. District staff and outside vendors will provide students with the tutoring sessions. LAUSD would continue to use its already existing high-dose tutoring eligibility criteria to determine which students receive the support. The district did not specify how it would measure the program’s success.

    The Los Angeles Unified School District is officially on the hook for providing high-dosage tutoring to students after a judge approved a settlement reached last fall.

    After being accused of denying students their right to equitable education during pandemic shutdowns, the district must now provide 100,000 students — more than a quarter of the district’s TK-12 students — with three years of high-dosage tutoring under a court-approved settlement, amounting to more than 10 million hours. District staff and outside vendors will provide students with a mix of virtual and in-person sessions.

    “The District is conducting a program evaluation of the tutoring program, which will explore variation in the implementation, take-up, and impact on student outcomes across a range of tutoring models and vendors,” LAUSD said in a statement to EdSource.

    The tutoring mandate stems from a court-approved settlement reached in October and finalized last month in Shaw et al. v. LAUSD et al., a lawsuit filed during the Covid-19 pandemic that alleged that only 60% of the district’s students participated in virtual instruction during the spring 2020 semester, denying them “basic educational equality guaranteed to them by the California Constitution.”

    LAUSD would continue to use its already existing high-dose tutoring eligibility criteria to determine which students receive the support. The district did not specify how it would measure the program’s success.

    The settlement 

    The high-dosage tutoring that Los Angeles Unified maintains it has been providing relies on money from the Expanded Learning Opportunities Program (ELOP). The lawsuit, which includes other supports outlined in the settlement, gained final approval on Feb. 18 and is intended to help close learning gaps and improve academic performance.

    The method specifically caters to students’ individual needs and provides either small group or one-on-one support that complements what they learn in the classroom, according to the National Student Support Accelerator at Stanford University.

    “Evidence does suggest that that kind of effort would boost student outcomes,” said Morgan Polikoff, a USC professor of education.

    “But I think it’s not likely to fully solve the problem, both because it’s missing a portion of the student population — a pretty sizable one — and also because I don’t know if that’s enough hours to solve the problem,” he said, referring to the fact that only a quarter of the student population will receive these services.

    Ned Hillenbrand, a partner with Kirkland & Ellis LLP and one of the lawyers representing the plaintiffs, emphasized the importance of accountability moving forward.

    “Our families understood that these issues affected students across the district. They admirably pursued remedial programs for those students as well as their own children,” Hillenbrand said in the statement.

    “Now that the court has approved the settlement, our goal is to hold LAUSD accountable and to maximize the benefits students receive during the three-year enforcement period.”

    Challenges with access  

    After the pandemic hit, Judith Larson, a plaintiff in the case, said she waited six months for a school computer to arrive, navigated connectivity challenges and even paid out of pocket for tutoring for her daughter. And one of the mentors struggled to help because she learned math in an entirely different way.

    Aida Vega found it difficult to access LAUSD’s tutoring services for her daughter, who struggled academically during the pandemic but eventually graduated. But Vega had to take on an extra job to pay for the support.

    “I did have the opportunity as a mom to be able to help my student that year because it was just her at that moment. I paid for her,” she said in Spanish. “But other parents had three, four children in schools and didn’t have that opportunity to pay. And now those students aren’t studying.”

    LAUSD’s tutoring webpage says schools will contact families whose students qualify, and that parents can contact their local school sites for more information.

    But Walt Gersón Rodríguez, the vice president of Innovate Public Schools, which supported parents in the suit, emphasized the importance of improving access, so parents and students don’t have to embark on a “scavenger hunt” to find them.

    “My concern would be that this information doesn’t reach the parents; their children don’t get the service and support,” Rodríguez said. “And then, we have another generation of students that either graduate or don’t graduate and don’t go on to college and get a job or career in a competitive economy that we have today.”

    Despite LAUSD’s gains in standardized test scores, which showed students are performing better than they did prepandemic, Polikoff noted that students are still “behind where they would have been had Covid not happened.”

    Rodríguez added that some graduates have struggled to meet A-G requirements, courses necessary for students to be eligible to attend University of California or California State University campuses, and are having a hard time getting into college or entering the workforce.

    If it weren’t for the setbacks, Larson said her daughter would have loved to attend UCLA. But she still considers herself one of the fortunate ones.

    “Many moms and dads that I know, that one [dream] we share is we need to do better and change for our children,” Larson said. “But here we are taking steps, one at a time.”

  • Sponsored message
  • What questions do you have for them?
    An official mail-in ballot drop box is posted outside of an L.A. subway station.

    Topline:

    LAist and The LA Local are preparing to ask the candidates questions that will shape our Voter Game Plan guides closer to the election. We want to hear from you: What are the issues and questions you want the mayoral candidates to address?

    Who's running? Mayor Karen Bass is running for reelection, but there's a long list of others preparing to compete against her. Among them: City Councilmember Nithya Raman, former reality star Spencer Pratt, community organizer Rae Huang and tech entrepreneur Adam Miller.

    When's the election? June 2. If any one candidate for mayor gets more than 50% of the vote, they'll win the election outright. If nobody meets that threshold, the top two vote-getters will compete in a runoff Nov. 3.

    Read on … for how to share your questions with LAist.

    L.A., you have a big choice to make this year. Mayor Karen Bass is running for a second term in office, and there's a long list of others — including City Councilmember Nithya Raman, former reality star Spencer Pratt, community organizer Rae Huang and tech entrepreneur Adam Miller — lined up to run against her.

    The election is June 2. If any one candidate for mayor gets more than 50% of the vote, they'll win the election outright. If nobody meets that threshold, the top two vote-getters will compete in a runoff Nov. 3.

    LAist and The LA Local are preparing to ask the candidates questions that will shape our voter guides closer to the June election. We want to make sure we're asking the right ones.

    So tell us: What are the issues and questions you want the mayoral candidates to address?

    Share your thoughts in the survey below.

  • LAUSD is on the hook for high-dosage tutoring
    A child speaks with a teacher at a table filled with large pads of paper in a classroom with tables just like it.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles Unified School District is officially on the hook for providing high-dosage tutoring to students after a judge approved a settlement reached last fall.

    Why now: After being accused of denying students their right to equitable education during pandemic shutdowns, the district must now provide 100,000 students — more than a quarter of the district’s TK-12 students — with three years of high-dosage tutoring under a court-approved settlement, amounting to more than 10 million hours.

    The backstory: The tutoring mandate stems from a court-approved settlement reached in October and finalized last month in Shaw et al. v. LAUSD et al., a lawsuit filed during the Covid-19 pandemic that alleged that only 60% of the district’s students participated in virtual instruction during the spring 2020 semester, denying them “basic educational equality guaranteed to them by the California Constitution.”

    Read on... for more about the tutoring mandate.

    The Los Angeles Unified School District is officially on the hook for providing high-dosage tutoring to students after a judge approved a settlement reached last fall.

    After being accused of denying students their right to equitable education during pandemic shutdowns, the district must now provide 100,000 students — more than a quarter of the district’s TK-12 students — with three years of high-dosage tutoring under a court-approved settlement, amounting to more than 10 million hours. District staff and outside vendors will provide students with a mix of virtual and in-person sessions.

    “The District is conducting a program evaluation of the tutoring program, which will explore variation in the implementation, take-up, and impact on student outcomes across a range of tutoring models and vendors,” LAUSD said in a statement to EdSource.

    The tutoring mandate stems from a court-approved settlement reached in October and finalized last month in Shaw et al. v. LAUSD et al., a lawsuit filed during the Covid-19 pandemic that alleged that only 60% of the district’s students participated in virtual instruction during the spring 2020 semester, denying them “basic educational equality guaranteed to them by the California Constitution.”

    LAUSD would continue to use its already existing high-dose tutoring eligibility criteria to determine which students receive the support. The district did not specify how it would measure the program’s success.

    The settlement

    The high-dosage tutoring that Los Angeles Unified maintains it has been providing relies on money from the Expanded Learning Opportunities Program (ELOP). The lawsuit, which includes other supports outlined in the settlement, gained final approval on Feb. 18 and is intended to help close learning gaps and improve academic performance.

    The method specifically caters to students’ individual needs and provides either small group or one-on-one support that complements what they learn in the classroom, according to the National Student Support Accelerator at Stanford University.

    “Evidence does suggest that that kind of effort would boost student outcomes,” said Morgan Polikoff, a USC professor of education.

    “But I think it’s not likely to fully solve the problem, both because it’s missing a portion of the student population — a pretty sizable one — and also because I don’t know if that’s enough hours to solve the problem,” he said, referring to the fact that only a quarter of the student population will receive these services.

    Ned Hillenbrand, a partner with Kirkland & Ellis LLP and one of the lawyers representing the plaintiffs, emphasized the importance of accountability moving forward.

    “Our families understood that these issues affected students across the district. They admirably pursued remedial programs for those students as well as their own children,” Hillenbrand said in the statement.

    “Now that the court has approved the settlement, our goal is to hold LAUSD accountable and to maximize the benefits students receive during the three-year enforcement period.”

    Challenges with access

    After the pandemic hit, Judith Larson, a plaintiff in the case, said she waited six months for a school computer to arrive, navigated connectivity challenges and even paid out of pocket for tutoring for her daughter. And one of the mentors struggled to help because she learned math in an entirely different way.

    Aida Vega found it difficult to access LAUSD’s tutoring services for her daughter, who struggled academically during the pandemic but eventually graduated. But Vega had to take on an extra job to pay for the support.

    “I did have the opportunity as a mom to be able to help my student that year because it was just her at that moment. I paid for her,” she said in Spanish. “But other parents had three, four children in schools and didn’t have that opportunity to pay. And now those students aren’t studying.”

    LAUSD’s tutoring webpage says schools will contact families whose students qualify, and that parents can contact their local school sites for more information.

    But Walt Gersón Rodríguez, the vice president of Innovate Public Schools, which supported parents in the suit, emphasized the importance of improving access, so parents and students don’t have to embark on a “scavenger hunt” to find them.

    “My concern would be that this information doesn’t reach the parents; their children don’t get the service and support,” Rodríguez said. “And then, we have another generation of students that either graduate or don’t graduate and don’t go on to college and get a job or career in a competitive economy that we have today.”

    Despite LAUSD’s gains in standardized test scores, which showed students are performing better than they did prepandemic, Polikoff noted that students are still “behind where they would have been had Covid not happened.”

    Rodríguez added that some graduates have struggled to meet A-G requirements, courses necessary for students to be eligible to attend University of California or California State University campuses, and are having a hard time getting into college or entering the workforce.

    If it weren’t for the setbacks, Larson said her daughter would have loved to attend UCLA. But she still considers herself one of the fortunate ones.

    “Many moms and dads that I know, that one [dream] we share is we need to do better and change for our children,” Larson said. “But here we are taking steps, one at a time.”

    EdSource is an independent nonprofit organization that provides analysis on key education issues facing California and the nation. LAist republishes articles from EdSource with permission.

  • Crashes cost the county nearly $5 million
    Black and white patrol car is seen against a blurred background.
    Crashes involving L.A. County sheriff's deputies cost the county nearly $5 million in settlements Tuesday.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors today agreed to pay $4.9 million to settle four lawsuits by people who were injured in collisions with Sheriff’s Department patrol vehicles between 2018 and 2020.

    The backstory: The payouts come amid increased scrutiny of crashes by law enforcement officers. It has emerged as a major national issue, with cities across the country paying out hundreds of millions of dollars in settlements and verdicts because of vehicle collisions involving officers, deputies or agents.

    Negligent: The plaintiffs in each of the sheriff’s cases said deputies were negligent when they crashed into their cars. In settling the lawsuits during an open-session vote Tuesday, the county admitted no wrongdoing.

    Read on ... for more information about the lawsuits.

    The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday agreed to pay $4.9 million to settle four lawsuits by people who were injured in collisions with Sheriff’s Department patrol cars.

    The payouts come amid increased scrutiny of crashes by law enforcement officers. It has emerged as a major national issue, with cities across the country paying out hundreds of millions of dollars in settlements and verdicts because of vehicle collisions involving officers, deputies or agents.

    In the latest L.A. County payouts, tied to collisions that happened between 2018 and 2020, all plaintiffs said deputies were negligent when they crashed into their cars.

    County supervisors settled the lawsuits during an open-session vote Tuesday. The county admitted no wrongdoing.

    A collision in Paramount

    Freddy Ontiveros and Antonio De La Cruz Zamora were hit from behind in 2018 in the city of Paramount, according to their lawsuit filed in Superior Court. They alleged in the suit that a sheriff’s deputy “rear ended the vehicle which was stopped behind plaintiff's vehicle, pushing the vehicle into plaintiff's vehicle causing plaintiff personal injuries and property damage.”

    The deputy was responding to a call of a robbery in progress and had activated the lights and sirens on the vehicle.

    A review of the Crash Data Retrieval system found the deputy was traveling south on Paramount Boulevard at 75 mph and slowed to 35 mph at the time of the collision, according to a corrective action plan presented to the board Tuesday.

    “The collision investigation concluded that the deputy sheriff caused the collision as he was driving at an unsafe speed for traffic conditions,” the plan stated.

    The case settled for $1.75 million.

    Later, the Lakewood Sheriff’s Station — which covers Paramount — conducted a review of all traffic collisions for the calendar year 2020 through the end of 2024. The audit revealed there were 196 total collisions for this five-year period, 129 of which were classified as preventable and 67 classified as non-preventable.

    “To improve employee safety and reduce the Department's liability and exposure, Lakewood supervisors continue to conduct bi-weekly briefings which focus on the importance of safe driving as well as abiding by all the rules of the road when operating county vehicles,” the plan stated.

    Other collisions

    In a separate incident, Shannon Story had a green light at Palmdale intersection on Oct. 27, 2019. According to her complaint, a deputy ran a red light and crashed into Story’s vehicle as she entered the intersection. The impact of the collision caused Story’s vehicle to crash into the corner wall of a 7-Eleven convenience store.

    “Plaintiff sustained significant injuries as a result of the collision,” her complaint read. She settled the case for $1.2 million.

    In another case filed by Jose Gaitan, he says a sheriff’s deputy in a department vehicle rear-ended his car. LAist was not immediately able to get further details on the crash. He settled for $450,000.

    The summary corrective action plan for a fourth collision describes how a deputy was backing up to make contact with a suspect when he ran into a car driven by Alejandra Gonzalez. The deputy “reversed approximately two to three feet and collided into the Plaintiff’s vehicle at approximately 5-10 mph.”

    Gonzalez settled for $1.5 million.