Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Controversial climate rule about to go into effect
    A gas price pylon sign categorizes prices by payment method (cash, credit/debit) and type of fuel (regular, plus, premium). The also includes the brand of the gas station, 76, within an orange circle.
    Gas prices at a station in Victorville on May 19, 2025.

    Topline:

    No immediate hike in California gas prices will occur but Democrats and Republicans in the Legislature fear the effects of the clean-fuel program.

    Why now: California’s revamped Low Carbon Fuel Standard takes effect on Tuesday, despite fierce Republican criticism and increasing Democratic trepidation over its potential to raise gas prices.

    The backstory: Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office issued a fact-check memo defending the rule and saying the impacts are exaggerated, while Republicans in the Legislature and Congress say it would damage the economy because Californians already pay the most in the nation for gasoline.

    Read on... for more details about the rule.

    California’s revamped Low Carbon Fuel Standard takes effect on Tuesday, despite fierce Republican criticism and increasing Democratic trepidation over its potential to raise gas prices.

    The new rules — which expand a program to reduce climate-warming gases and clean the air — ratchet up requirements for cleaner fuels and broaden a $2 billion credit market aimed at cutting emissions from cars, trucks and freight.

    No immediate hike in gas prices will occur. Experts say the future impact is uncertain because it depends on how much the oil industry spends on buying credits and then passes it onto consumers.

    The previous fuel standard, which was set in 2011, added 9 cents to the cost of a gallon; a UC Davis researcher estimates that the new one could add 5 to 8 cents per gallon.

    The Newsom administration is bracing for more political attacks as Republican legislators have seized on the issue. Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office issued a fact-check memo defending the rule and saying the impacts are exaggerated, while Republicans in the Legislature and Congress say it would damage the economy because Californians already pay the most in the nation for gasoline. State Sen. Brian Jones requested an audit of the rule, calling it “nothing short of price gouging by Newsom, hitting Californians where it hurts the most.”

    Democratic lawmakers last week introduced legislation that would cap the price of the standard’s fuel credits in an effort to rein in price spikes at the pump. The measure is supported by one of the state’s most powerful Democrats, Senate President Pro Tempore Mike McGuire, who said it “will reduce costs for drivers across the Golden State while continuing to move our climate and energy goals full steam ahead.”

    The new fuel standard is projected to reduce carbon dioxide-equivalent gases by 558 million metric tons through 2046, according to the air board's economic assessment. Those reductions are equal to the emissions of more than 120 million cars on average in a year. Some critics say that is an overestimate, because soybean fuels may not be as clean as reported.

    Cleaner, low-carbon fuels include biofuels made from soybeans or cow manure. The program has been particularly successful in reducing the diesel fuels used by medium and heavy-duty trucks. Over the 13 years, it has displaced 25 billion gallons of petroleum fuels, according to the air board.

    The new fuel standard was temporarily delayed earlier this year when the state’s administrative law office rejected it and sent it back to the air board to add more clarity to the rule.

    Assemblymember Jasmeet Bains, a Bakersfield Democrat, last month called for the resignation of California Air Resources Board Chair Liane Randolph over concerns that the agency did not study the economic impacts of its new standard.

    Randolph said in a statement that gas prices are “over a dollar per gallon cheaper than just a few years ago. Our efforts to deploy more zero-emission vehicles and reduce fossil fuel use is working to cut demand and create more competition in the fuels market, and the (fuel standard) is a big part of that effort.”

    In an unrelated action, California’s gasoline excise tax, which is adjusted annually, will increase by 1.6 cents per gallon on Tuesday. The tax is primarily used to pay for roads and highways.

  • Former LAFD fire chief sues over her removal
    A white woman in a dark uniform stands next to a Black woman in glasses who's wearing a red and white stripped shirt under a dark blue jacket as they address reporters.
    Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, right, and then-Fire Chief Kristin Crowley, left, address the media on Jan. 11, 2025.

    Topline:

    Former L.A. Fire Department Chief Kristin Crowley is suing the city of L.A., alleging that her removal after the Palisades Fire was retaliatory.

    The background: L.A. Mayor Karen Bass removed Crowley from her role as chief in February 2025, saying that Crowley had failed to deploy enough firefighters before the Palisades Fire started. Last summer, Crowley filed a claim against the city of L.A. and Bass in which she alleged defamation and that the mayor had thrown her under the bus after the fires.

    What the lawsuit says: The lawsuit, filed Friday, accuses Bass of “orchestrating a campaign of retaliation to conceal the extent to which Bass undermined public safety and transparency.”

    Crowley also criticized the mayor’s handling of last year’s fire, saying the mayor ignored repeated warnings about the risks posed by LAFD’s “worsening resource and staffing crisis” and instead further cut the department’s budget. She claims that Bass retaliated against her by removing her as fire chief and relegating her to a lower position in the department following comments Crowley made publicly about the LAFD being underfunded.

    The lawsuit seeks unspecified monetary damages and “accountability for Bass’ calculated efforts to punish a dedicated LAFD civil servant for exposing the truth, and for choosing the safety of the city and its firefighters over the interests of Bass and her cover-up.”.

    The mayor’s response: “There is nothing new here,” said Yusef Robb, senior advisor to Bass, in a statement. “Ms. Crowley was removed from her post for her failure to predeploy and her decision to send 1,000 firefighters home instead of keeping them on duty on the morning the fires broke out. This lawsuit has no merit.”

    Go deeper: For more on the fallout between Mayor Bass and Kristen Crowley over the city's response to the Palisades Fire, listen to this episode of LAist's podcast "Imperfect Paradise."

  • Sponsored message
  • How a Long Beach resident’s $2k debt got paid off
    Patients rest in a hallway in the emergency room area at Providence St. Mary Medical Center on Jan. 27, 2021 in Apple Valley.
    In L.A. County, one emergency room visit a year can increase your risk for medical debt.

    Topline:

    One in nine Angelenos experience medical debt in L.A. County, almost a million people. For the past two years, L.A. County has been working with a nonprofit, Undue Medical Debt, to help struggling residents by abolishing unpaid medical bills. We look at one person’s struggle with medical debt at a young age, and how she learned her bill got erased.

    How did this start? Long Beach resident Alexy Cordova got into a car crash when she was just 16 years old. She needed multiple surgeries, and over the years her emergency visits continued because of constant pain. The visits created a mountain of medical bills that went into collections.

    Erasing the debt: One of her bills — a charge for $2,200 dollars — has been erased. That happened through a county pilot program with the nonprofit Undue Medical Debt, which buys the debt for pennies on the dollar.

    What she’s learned: She says knowing that the bill is gone has been a big relief. She encourages others to do what she does now: get an itemized list and negotiate your bill.

    Read on…. to learn more about her journey.

    Medical debt affects 1 in 9 Los Angeles County residents — almost a million people — according to the county health department. It’s a financial burden Long Beach resident Alexy Cordova learned about at a young age.

    When she was 16 years old, Cordova was in a car crash that resulted in multiple surgeries on her spine and intestines. But over the years, her pain kept coming back to the point where she was constantly in the emergency room.

    Despite having health insurance, those visits led to medical bills which piled up, including one for $2,200 in 2020.

    Getting the relief

    For Cordova, who’s now 25, living with that debt was a heavy burden. She wanted to pay it off, but she was young, and with a minimum wage job, it was hard to save and focus on her education at the same time.

    “You want to pay this, but you have all these other bills,” Cordova said. “What comes first? Obviously not medical debt. I mean, not to me. I’m going to be honest.”

    Many of the bills went into collections. Recently, she paid a repair service to help take care of them — but then she received a letter in the mail. She almost assumed it was another bill, but when she opened it, she realized it was something else entirely.

    It was a notice telling her that $2,200 of her debt was being paid off by an L.A. County pilot program, which uses the nonprofit Undue Medical Debt to buy medical debt for pennies on the dollar. Cordova was happy to see it.

    A portrait of a woman with a medium light skin tone wearing a black shoulderless top. Her black hair is long and she's smiling at the camera. The background is blurry, but it's a colorful area.
    Alexy Cordova works as a legal assistant while she pursues a degree in criminal Justice.
    (
    Courtesy Alexy Cordova
    )

    “ I definitely felt relieved,” she said. “Knowing that I have a bill really does stress me out, and it adds to everything that I have going on.”

    So far, L.A. County’s pilot program has abolished more than $363 million in unpaid medical bills, for 170,000 residents.

    You can’t apply for the relief; instead the program works with certain hospitals and healthcare providers to identify debts eligible for the program.

    The debt problem

    Unpaid medical bills are very common and often out of people’s control.

    Certain factors can increase your risk. County public health data shows that visiting an emergency room just once a year makes you twice as likely to face medical debt. It also disproportionally affects lower-income households and Latino and Black patients.

    Cordova says her situation happened because she wasn’t getting the right help at those emergency room visits, and doctors weren’t telling her where to go next. She ended up finding a specialist at the recommendation of her mother, a step that finally reduced her pain.

    Cordova has learned from her debt experience and has some suggestions: Ask for itemized bills any time you get charged for care, so you can see what you’re being asked to pay for, and negotiate your bill.

    “ If you don’t understand a charge, look into it. If you feel like it’s excessive, say something. I didn’t know that when I was younger,” she said.

    More medical debt relief is on the way for L.A. County residents. According to an Undue spokesperson, they have about half of the current contract still to spend for the pilot program.

  • Rapid Rehousing aims to reduce homelessness
    Man with gray beard and tattoos sits reading in courtyard of large concrete library building with numerous windows.
    Oscar Deleon Jr., a student and Rapid Rehousing beneficiary, sits outside the Meriam Library at Chico State.

    Topline:

    Since the program launched in 2020, the College Focused Rapid Rehousing program has helped over 9,000 students facing housing insecurity or homelessness. Through partnering with local community-based organizations, Rapid Rehousing provides students with emergency housing, rental subsidies, case management and advising.

    The context: Rapid Rehousing operates at all 10 University of California campuses, 25 community colleges and 18 California State University campuses. Students in the program reported higher GPAs and improved mental health and nutrition, according to an evaluation of the program in 2025 by the Center for Equitable Higher Education at Cal State Long Beach. As of 2025, California spends $31 million annually on Rapid Rehousing programs in higher education. The governor’s proposed budget for 2026-27, released in January, also includes $31 million.

    The background: Following the 2018 Camp Fire in Northern California, Butte County lost over a third of its housing stock, impacting students at Chico State. But students everywhere were having a hard time finding affordable housing. In 2018, 10.9% of 27,805 students surveyed across the Cal State system reported they had experienced homelessness in a Student Basic Needs survey commissioned by the chancellor’s office. In a separate survey of California community college students, 19% of nearly 40,000 respondents had experienced homelessness between 2016 and 2018.

    Initial aid: In response, the state Legislature included $10 million for a rapid rehousing pilot program in the state Budget Act of 2019, with $3.5 million going to UCs and $6.5 million to Cal States. Universities applied within their systems to receive grants to participate.

    Read on... for more on who the program has helped.

    Nineteen hours after leaving Coachella Valley, Oscar Deleon Jr. stepped off a bus with four bags of clothes, $800, admission to Chico State University, and no idea where he was going to live or work. All he knew was that he was taking his agriculture professor’s advice from College of the Desert and transferring to a university to continue his education.

    He checked into a hotel. Two days later, at orientation, he learned about the Rapid Rehousing program at Chico State. The program’s community partner, True North Housing Alliance, a nonprofit that addresses homelessness in Butte County, paid for Deleon’s hotel bill. The university transferred Deleon to student housing for the school year and helped him secure financial aid to cover most of the cost.

    “When I needed somewhere to go, they were willing to help me out, no questions asked. ‘Let’s get you situated,’ you know? You don’t forget that kind of help,” Deleon said.

    Since the program launched in 2020, the College Focused Rapid Rehousing program has helped over 9,000 students facing housing insecurity or homelessness. Through partnering with local community-based organizations, Rapid Rehousing provides students with emergency housing, rental subsidies, case management and advising.

    Rapid Rehousing operates at all 10 University of California campuses, 25 community colleges and 18 California State University campuses. Students in the program reported higher GPAs and improved mental health and nutrition, according to an evaluation of the program in 2025 by the Center for Equitable Higher Education at Cal State Long Beach. As of 2025, California spends $31 million annually on Rapid Rehousing programs in higher education. The governor’s proposed budget for 2026-27, released in January, also includes $31 million.

    Rapid Rehousing came to the rescue

    Following the 2018 Camp Fire in Northern California, Butte County lost over a third of its housing stock, impacting students at Chico State.

    “A whole town was lost of housing,” said Emma Jewett, the senior basic needs case manager at Chico State. “Our students are often struggling to get housing and find sustainable housing as it is, because they don’t have the qualifying factors, such as making three times the rent.”

    But students everywhere were having a hard time finding affordable housing. In 2018, 10.9% of 27,805 students surveyed across the Cal State system reported they had experienced homelessness in a Student Basic Needs survey commissioned by the chancellor’s office. In a separate survey of California community college students, 19% of nearly 40,000 respondents had experienced homelessness between 2016 and 2018.

    Meanwhile, off-campus housing costs across the state increased by more than 30% between 2018 and 2022, according to California Competes, a research organization focused on higher education and workforce issues.

    In response, the state Legislature included $10 million for a rapid rehousing pilot program in the state Budget Act of 2019, with $3.5 million going to UCs and $6.5 million to Cal States. Universities applied within their systems to receive grants to participate.

    Two women with long blonde hair stand side by side in a kitchen with blue tile countertops and white cabinets, smiling at the camera.
    Left to right, Emma Jewett and Leah Slem, staff leaders of the Basic Needs Center at Chico State, stand inside a Rapid Rehousing home in Chico on Feb. 5, 2026.
    (
    Salvador Ochoa
    /
    CalMatters
    )

    Chico State was one of the Cal State campuses initially awarded funds in 2020, alongside Long Beach, Pomona, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, and San José. The state expanded the program to include Northridge in 2021. All UC campuses participated in the pilot as well.

    Moving from kitchen to garage to student housing

    Rapid Rehousing felt like a “support system,” said Eli Reyneveld, a third-year communications major and soccer player at Sacramento State. He didn’t always want to be a student athlete, but after playing soccer at Modesto Junior College, the opportunity presented itself. “I scored a lot of goals,” he recalled.

    When he received a Division I scholarship offer to cover his tuition at Sacramento State starting in spring 2024, he had just two days to accept. He worried whether he would be able to afford moving from his parents’ house in Modesto.

    “I wasn’t ready to move anywhere, but I had to just take the jump,” Reyneveld said.

    At first, Reyneveld moved into a house with five guys on the soccer team. He slept in the kitchen and paid $550 a month for his share of the rent.

    It felt far from a home. It was hard for Reyneveld to get enough sleep, and there were tensions among his housemates. He moved into a different house shared by more of his teammates, where he slept on a mattress in the garage for $800 a month. A full night of rest was just as hard to get as the sound of cars never stopped.

    Being a student athlete required Reyneveld to juggle school, traveling for games, training and maintaining a healthy diet. But his living conditions made it hard to eat and sleep consistently.

    He avoided telling trainers and staff about his living situation, recalling being “too prideful to tell anybody,” until his athletic performance deteriorated. By September 2024, his trainer pulled him aside at practice and Reyneveld told him everything.

    Man wearing blue cap and dark blue jacket stands confidently with arms crossed in front of soccer goal net.
    Eli Reyneveld, a member of the Sacramento State men’s soccer team, on the university’s soccer field on Jan. 27, 2026.
    (
    Aliza Imran
    /
    CalMatters
    )

    That week, Reyneveld met with Basic Needs Center staff and, that night, he was transferred into a hotel that Rapid Rehousing fully covered. Three days later, he moved into student housing where he would pay just $500 a month for five months, meals included.

    “As soon as I got moved into a room, I think my coach and trainer could tell you, like, my performance is 180. I was a whole new player,” Reyneveld said.

    Reyneveld moved out of student housing in February into his own apartment, where Rapid Rehousing is now paying him $200 a month for five months to help with his rent.

    “I was about to turn down the scholarship to a D1 because I didn’t have the necessary means to move, but I just took a risk and (it) ended up working out because people are helping me,” he said.

    Local organizations help campuses assist students

    All campuses with Rapid Rehousing partner with community organizations that connect students to case managers, housing assistance, and academic and mental health support.

    Long-term case management makes a big difference, according to Jessica Wolin, a public health lecturer at San Francisco State, who led the Cal State Long Beach evaluation of the program.

    “Our evaluation showed the more meaningful outcomes for students who are experiencing homelessness is through this longer term, higher touch, more holistic intervention,” Wolin said. “And those needs are not met with (just) an emergency voucher.”

    At Sacramento State, all students in the Rapid Rehousing program pay $500 per month toward their housing costs until they are ready for the next step. Other campuses, such as Chico State, determine students’ costs based on what they can afford. On-campus teams also work with financial aid offices to incorporate emergency grants into students’ aid packages.

    Rapid Rehousing also teaches students about managing personal finances, understanding lease agreements, handling roommate conflicts, and planning for housing after graduation. Community partners work with students one semester prior to their graduation date to find housing they can afford or find relatives they can live with after graduation.

    “Because these programs are (tied to enrollment), we have to make sure that we structure them so that students have some sense of urgency about the importance of working with us to find their next more permanent and stable housing that will be more long-term,” said Sacramento State Campus Wellness Director Emily Tupper.

    ince 2020, Chico State’s Rapid Rehousing Program has provided over 600 students emergency shelter, transitional housing, or grants.

    “A lot of students were thinking about dropping out of school and, after, they report that Rapid Rehousing has helped them stay in school,” said Chico State Basic Needs Director Leah Slem. “Our program is a lifeline to these students who possibly would have dropped out had they not received this assistance.”

    When R.S., a student at Chico State who requested anonymity due to her international student status, first heard from her parents that they were on the verge of going bankrupt, she immediately went to the university’s International Student and Scholar Services office. In less than a month, she moved out of her off-campus apartment into on-campus student housing, which has been fully covered since November 2024.

    With the help of her case manager, R.S. was referred to work on campus at Chico State’s Hungry Wildcat Food Pantry, which helped pay for her tuition.

    International students often face unique challenges in college, Wolin said. In addition to not being able to access family support nearby, they are also not eligible for benefits like CalFresh.

    “I was kind of going through a lot, but I didn’t really reach out for anything until the water almost got into my nose, and I’m like, ‘Oh no, you know, if I don’t help myself, who can help me?’’’ R.S. recalled. She urges all students to put themselves “out there” and to not be scared to ask for help.

    Even with programs like Rapid Rehousing, housing insecurity still affects students across the state. As of April 2024, 1 in 5 community college students, 1 in 10 Cal State students and 1 in 20 UC students face homelessness, whereas 1 in 12 face homelessness in the general California population, according to California Competes.

    From formerly homeless to doctoral dreams

    The Cal State Long Beach evaluation of the Rapid Rehousing program at eight Cal States and two community colleges revealed how homelessness and housing insecurity disproportionately impacts certain student groups.

    Of Cal State students, 4% identify as Black or African American, compared to 18.5% of Rapid Rehousing students. One-third of Cal State students are transfers, but transfers made up nearly half of Rapid Rehousing participants. Three-quarters of Rapid Rehousing students were first-generation, compared to a quarter systemwide. Foster youth made up 17% of the program, versus less than 1% of all students at Cal State.

    Wolin said the findings reveal that “the program is reaching who they need to reach.”

    As a formerly incarcerated, first-generation and transfer student at Chico State, Deleon recalled how “even having an associate’s (degree) was a big thing” for his family. He enrolled at College of the Desert to earn a 25-unit certificate in agriculture. On his first day, he recalled his professor telling him, “if you’re here for the certificate, you may as well stay for the degree.”

    He completed his associate’s degree in agriculture, delivered his class graduation speech, and got accepted by all five Cal State universities he applied to. But after he left a long-term relationship at the end of that school year, he found himself homeless and couch surfing.

    At Chico State, Rapid Rehousing helped Deleon remain in student housing throughout the 2024-25 school year while he worked on campus at Project Rebound, a program that supports formerly incarcerated students. In June, he moved into a shared off-campus apartment.

    This fall, Deleon will be starting a master’s degree in agriculture at Chico State, and he hopes to later obtain a doctorate. If it weren’t for Rapid Rehousing, he said he doesn’t know if he would have had “the courage to stay in school.”

    Deleon just returned from his first plane ride and research trip in Puerto Rico, where he saw plantain, mango, coffee berry and pineapple farms. Agriculture is what led Deleon back to school, he recalled, but Rapid Rehousing kept him in it.

    “I’m planting those seeds of getting a Ph.D. now,” Deleon said. “(As) someone that’s formerly incarcerated, messed up his life before he got it back together … now that I have a second chance of getting my life right, look what I’ve done with it, with the opportunity I was given.”

    Khadeejah Khan is a contributor with the College Journalism Network, a collaboration between CalMatters and student journalists from across California. CalMatters higher education coverage is supported by a grant from the College Futures Foundation.

  • UCLA accused of facilitating antisemitism
    UCLA-PRO-PALESTINE-ENCAMPENT
    Students and demonstrators have formed a Pro-Palestinian occupation encampment protest on campus at UCLA in front of Royce Hall on April 25, 2024.

    Topline:

    The Trump administration on Tuesday sued the University of California system over allegations that UCLA officials allowed antisemitism to flourish on campus and impede on the civil rights of Jewish and Israeli faculty and students.

    Why it matters: The UCLA campus became a flashpoint in Los Angeles after Hamas militants atttacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, prompting the war in Gaza, which in turn spurred pro-Palestinian activism on campus. A student encampment against the war ended in arrests and violence from counter-protesters on the Westwood campus in 2024.

    Main allegation: The 81-page lawsuit alleges UCLA officials “turned a blind eye to — and at times facilitated — grossly antisemitic acts and systematically ignored cries for help from its own terrified Jewish and Israeli employees.”

    Why now: The lawsuit comes months after the Trump administration unsuccessfully demanded a range of concessions to bring UCLA more in line with its ideology, in addition to more than $1 billion in fines. But a series of court rulings curtailed that effort.

    The Trump administration on Tuesday sued the University of California system over allegations that UCLA officials allowed antisemitism to flourish on campus and impede on the civil rights of Jewish and Israeli faculty and students.

    The UCLA campus became a flashpoint in Los Angeles after Hamas militants attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, prompting the war in Gaza, which in turn spurred pro-Palestinian activism on campus. A student encampment against the war ended in arrests and violence from counter-protesters on the Westwood campus in 2024.

    An independent audit released in November 2024 found that UCLA police and administrators lacked sufficient plans with how to deal with the campus disruptions and were slow to respond and were “more chaotic than they should have been.”

    The 81-page lawsuit alleges UCLA officials “turned a blind eye to — and at times facilitated — grossly antisemitic acts and systematically ignored cries for help from its own terrified Jewish and Israeli employees.”

    “Based on our investigation, UCLA administrators allegedly allowed virulent anti-Semitism to flourish on campus, harming students and staff alike,” Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement.

    Mary Osako, UCLA's Vice Chancellor for Strategic Communications, said in a statement that as Chancellor Julio Frenk has made clear: "Antisemitism is abhorrent and has no place at UCLA or anywhere."

    She pointed to "concrete and significant steps" the university has taken to "strengthen campus safety, enforce policies, and combat antisemitism in a systemic and sustained manner," including reorganizing the Office of Civil Rights and hiring an official to ensure oversight.

    "We stand firmly by the decisive actions we have taken to combat antisemitism in all its forms, and we will vigorously defend our efforts and our unwavering commitment to providing a safe, inclusive environment for all members of our community," Osako added.

    The faculty union did not immediately respond to a request for comment. However, last September, over 200 Jewish faculty members from campuses across the state signed a letter to the UC Board of Regents stating: “Like Jewish people across the country and around the world, we hold various views about Israel and Palestine, U.S. policy in the Middle East and student activism on campus. But we are united in denouncing the federal government’s attempt to hobble the University of California—a bastion of free inquiry, social mobility and essential research—under the cynical and pretextual guise of ‘combating antisemitism.’”

    The lawsuit comes months after the Trump administration unsuccessfully demanded a range of concessions to bring UCLA more in line with its ideology, in addition to more than $1 billion in fines. But a series of court rulings curtailed that effort.

    In December 2025, ProPublica and The Chronicle of Higher Education published a report showing “the extent to which the government violated legal and procedural norms to gin up its case against the school.” The DOJ’s career attorneys eventually recommended a lawsuit against only UCLA.

    Disclosure: Julia Barajas is a part-time graduate student at UCLA Law.