Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Refrigerators and stoves must be provided in 2026
    A person views a refrigerator in a Home Depot store on Sept. 13, 2022, in Huntington Park, California.
    AB 628 will require landlords to provide tenants with a fridge and stove. Previously, many rental homes in Southern California would not include these appliances.

    Topline:

    On Jan. 1, California will begin requiring landlords to provide their tenants with a fridge and stove — and repair or replace them if they stop working.

    About the new law: All new leases signed on or after Jan. 1 will need to include a working fridge and stove. When an existing lease is renewed or extended at any moment starting on Jan. 1, those homes will also need to have these appliances. While this new law may surprise some tenants who have always lived in apartments that already came with these appliances, it’s more common in Southern California cities for landlords to rent out homes with no stove or refrigerator, placing this responsibility on the tenant.

    What kinds of fridges and stoves are required?: The actual text of the law is pretty broad and only specifies that these appliances need to be in “good working order.” A stove must be “capable of safely generating heat for cooking purposes,” while a refrigerator should be “capable of safely storing food.”

    Read on . . . for contact information for local code enforcement departments.

    Renting in California is not cheap. The average rent for a one-bedroom in the Golden State — $2,100 — is 40% higher than the national average. But renters will soon be getting a little more for their money: a working refrigerator and stove.

    On Jan. 1, California will begin requiring landlords to provide their tenants with a fridge and stove — and repair or replace them if they stop working.

    While this new law may surprise some tenants who have always lived in apartments that already came with these appliances, it’s more common in Southern California cities for landlords to rent out homes with no stove or refrigerator, placing this responsibility on the tenant.

    AB 628 — authored by state Assemblymember Tina McKinnor, D-Inglewood — adds these appliances to the state’s definition of a livable home, helping secure access to these appliances for the state’s millions of tenants.

    “Having a working, safe fridge and stove will be a minimum requirement for keeping the unit in a habitable state,” said Ethan Silverstein, staff attorney for the housing rights nonprofit, The California Center for Movement Legal Services.

    Whether you are a renter or landlord, keep reading to learn how AB 628 applies in different situations and what legal experts recommend to make sure your home is up-to-date with the state’s habitability standards.

    What does the law actually say?

    All new leases signed on or after Jan. 1 will need to include a working fridge and stove.

    When an existing lease is renewed or extended at any moment starting on Jan. 1, those homes will also need to have these appliances.

    “The way this law is written, it will eventually apply to all new and current renters in California,” Silverstein said.

    This law also applies to homes where tenants are renting without a formal written agreement (e.g., renting “informally” with a month-to-month lease).

    What tenants should know

    If you’re thinking about moving and hoping to land a new spot sometime in 2026, any potential landlord must be ready to provide a stove and refrigerator, along with any maintenance these devices need in the future — at no cost to you. And if you plan to stay in your current rental home, this law will impact you, depending on who provided the appliances.

    If you bought your own refrigerator when you moved in, you can talk with your landlord before it’s time to renew your lease and decide together if it makes more sense to keep it or replace it with one provided by your landlord.

    “The parties can agree for the tenant to bring their own refrigerator,” said Whitney Prout, executive vice president of legal affairs for the California Apartment Association, which advises landlords and developers. “But you can’t require the tenant to bring their own refrigerator. … It has to be the tenant’s voluntary choice and the landlord has to agree.”

    If both you and your landlord decide to keep the fridge you provided, the law requires that the lease acknowledge this arrangement by adding the following disclosure:

    “Under state law, the landlord is required to provide a refrigerator in good working order in your unit. By checking this box, you acknowledge that you have asked to bring your own refrigerator and that you are responsible for keeping that refrigerator in working order.”

    But under no circumstances can the landlord ask a tenant to buy their home’s stove. “The landlord needs to provide the stove,” Prout said. “You can’t have an agreement for the tenant to provide their own stove.”

    What landlords need to know

    Landlords should start preparing now to comply with AB 628, Prout said. “Look at when your lease renewals are coming up, because that does give you some flexibility in terms of phasing in compliance with this law — especially if you have a lot of appliances you need to acquire,” she said.

    What kind of stove or fridge are landlords required to provide? The actual text of the law is pretty broad and only specifies that these appliances need to be in “good working order.” A stove must be “capable of safely generating heat for cooking purposes,” while a refrigerator should be “capable of safely storing food.” According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, a refrigerator that can keep temperatures at 40°F or below can protect most food products.

    On Jan. 1, California will begin requiring landlords to provide their tenants with a fridge and stove — and repair or replace them if they stop working. (Alicia Windzio/Picture Alliance via Getty Images)As for what appliance brand or model, that’s the landlord’s decision. But Prout added that it could be a good idea to share with tenants some information on the appliances you’ll provide them with, especially if you’re planning to replace what’s in their home.

    “The tenant may have feelings about aesthetics,” she said. “They may have invested in a stainless steel refrigerator that they’re really happy with, that has certain functionalities.”

    And if you will replace existing appliances, make a plan to safely remove them. “Communicate with residents what the appropriate processes are for removal and disposal of tenant-provided appliances,” Prout said, adding that “Illegal dumping is a huge problem around rental property.”

    What if these appliances break down?

    If the tenant provided the fridge— and both the tenant and landlord agreed to this arrangement — then it’s actually the tenant’s responsibility to make repairs.

    But if the landlord provided both the refrigerator and stove, then it’s up to the landlord to make sure they keep functioning. “You provide the appliances; if they break down, you fix them or replace them — as long as you’re doing that, you’re in compliance with the law,” Prout said.

    The law explicitly states that property owners have 30 days to either replace or repair these appliances if there is a recall from the manufacturer.

    Landlords: Keep in mind that while it’s legal to provide your tenants with second-hand appliances, it may be more difficult to keep up with recall announcements, as the manufacturer may not have a record that you bought their product.

    But if these devices simply break down with time or use, “It’s like any other repair issue where the landlord needs to act in a reasonable amount of time to get it replaced,” Silverstein said.

    Silverstein recommends that tenants notify their landlords about any repair needs through written communication, like a text message or email.

    “The worst thing you can do is make the request verbally through the phone,” he said, adding that keeping this “paper” trail could be helpful if your landlord fails to make necessary repairs. You can also ask your landlord for a clear date for when repairs will be made and what you can do in the interim to safely store or cook your food.

    If a landlord is not complying with AB 628, tenants can contact their city’s rent board or building code enforcement agency. After a tenant files a complaint, code enforcement staff will contact the landlord to enforce the state’s habitability standards.

    Below is the contact information for the code enforcement departments of several California cities. You can also quickly look up the contact information for your city’s agency with an online search.

  • Judge wants to find new funding administrator soon
    guy on a matress
    An L.A. Metro bus drives past a man sleeping on the sidewalk on North Spring Street in downtown Los Angeles.
    Topline:
    The embattled lead homeless services agency for the Los Angeles region will stay in place for now. A federal judge said Wednesday that it’s still unknown who will take over management of L.A.'s roughly $240 million per year in federal homelessness funds, and how soon.
    How we got here: In June, the Trump administration suspended the L.A. Homeless Services Authority from applying for federal funding, alleging financial mismanagement. LAHSA sued. U.S. District Judge David O. Carter paused the suspension in August, allowing the agency time to submit a $239 million grant application before an upcoming deadline.

    A time of transition: Earlier this month, LAHSA's governing commission voted to give up its federal roles next year. Regional officials are now taking applications for LAHSA’s replacement. The county's new Department of Homeless Services and Housing is among the applicants. A decision on LAHSA’s successors is expected by Oct. 19.

    What's next: At Wednesday's hearing, Carter signaled that he wants to see federal funding transferred to the county by January if it is chosen as LAHSA’s successor. Carter has scheduled an Oct. 27 hearing he described as "our decision-making day on so many matters."

    Read more… to learn why federal officials are uneasy about continuing to fund LAHSA in the months to come.

    The Los Angeles region’s troubled homeless services agency announced this month that it will no longer manage the region’s federal homelessness dollars, amid scrutiny from the Trump administration.

    Now, a federal court must help determine who will manage roughly $240 million in annual federal funding after the L.A. Homeless Services Authority gives up that long-held job in the coming months.

    At a hearing Wednesday, U.S. District Judge David O. Carter said most of his attention is on who will administer the round of federal money that will be awarded in December and distributed next year.

    The only potential near-term successor discussed in court was L.A. County, which created a new homelessness department and applied for the role. County officials have promised much stronger accountability and transparency.

    But the city of L.A., where most of the region’s unhoused people live, is also interested in taking over some of LAHSA’s duties. The city could eventually try to break off and form its own regional body to receive federal funds, Carter said.

    “But that’s for the future,” Carter said. “For now, we have to focus on providing for people experiencing homelessness — and also fraud and corruption.”

    ‘The watchdog wasn’t watching’

    LAHSA has been used as a punching bag, Carter said, but he blamed recent cases of alleged theft of taxpayer funds on a broader “failure of government” by both HUD and LAHSA.

    “The watchdog wasn’t watching, and the money got distributed without accountability,” Carter said.

    In the meantime, Carter said, LAHSA isn’t going anywhere. He said any transition must unfold gradually to avoid displacing people from housing and services.

    “We’re going to have to live with LAHSA for at least some period of time,” Carter said. “The question might be how much?”

    How soon could the county take over? 

    Carter said he agreed with LAHSA’s decision to entrust another administrator to manage the money.

    Attorneys for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) told Carter the next round of annual funding would be distributed over 2027.

    Carter acknowledged HUD may be uneasy sending that money to LAHSA, the very agency it is investigating for fraud. Carter said he was struggling with the issue himself.

    Carter signaled that he wants to see federal funding transferred to the county by January if it is chosen as LAHSA’s successor.

    ‘The devil is in the details’

    At the hearing, federal prosecutor Bill Essayli said the Trump administration would rather reach an agreement than litigate. He said “the devil is in the details” when it comes to any transition away from LAHSA.

    “We want assurances of anti-fraud measures,” Essayli said. “That way the money is never stolen again.”

    Carter said he hoped a transition plan would keep the parties from spending millions of dollars on attorneys’ fees that could otherwise go toward housing and services.

    How we got here

    In June, the Trump administration suspended LAHSA from applying for federal funding, alleging years of financial mismanagement. LAHSA then sued, and Carter blocked the suspension in August. Carter’s decision has so far held up on appeal.

    LAHSA’s governing commission voted this month to give up its federal roles next year, including managing federal homelessness dollars and conducting the region’s annual homeless count. Local officials have been taking applications from organizations that want to take over those duties in 2027.

    Meanwhile, investigations into fraud have been widening. Prosecutors have so far charged six people connected to L.A. homeless service providers. LAHSA has said none of its staff are implicated.

    When asked if LAHSA’s current or past leadership has been culpable, Essayli recently said, "It is not against federal law to be incompetent, unfortunately.”

    Major shifts happening

    For decades, county, city and federal dollars have been managed mainly by LAHSA. But those funding streams are now being redirected in the wake of repeated findings of mismanagement.

    L.A. County pulled roughly $300 million of its annual homelessness funding in July and gave it to its new in-house Department of Homeless Services and Housing.

    That leaves the city as LAHSA’s last major funder. The City Council has explored leaving, but hasn't reached a decision yet. City staff has estimated that building a city homeless services department would take up to two years.

    On the campaign trail, Councilmember Nithya Raman has pledged to exit LAHSA within her first year if elected mayor, while incumbent Mayor Karen Bass has said it would take "a couple of years."

    What’s next

    Carter did not rule Wednesday on federal funding. He scheduled a hearing for Oct. 27 and described it as “our decision-making day on so many matters.”

    Before then, local officials are expected to select a replacement to take over LAHSA’s federal administrative roles.

  • Sponsored message
  • City leaders say details are being wrongly hidden
    A large flame blazes at the top of a tower, with blue sky behind it. Below the flame, there's a white flag that reads "LA28 Olympic Games."
    Olympics organizers have agreed to report information on contracts worth more than $1 million to the city.

    Topline:

    Los Angeles city officials are asking LA28 to hand over a list of its contracts, saying the Olympics organizing committee could be in violation of its agreement with the city.

    The details: LA28’s annual financial report released last week included a broad review of the organization’s deals with contractors hired to help put on the event, but no names or detailed breakdowns of spending. The Games Agreement between the city and LA28 requires the committee to submit the name, type, amount, term and purpose of each contract it has entered into worth more than $1 million.

    What the city's asking for: Chief Legislative Analyst Sharon Tso said Wednesday that she has requested a full list from LA28 and is waiting to hear back.

    The response: Jacie Prieto Lopez, a spokesperson for LA28, said in an emailed statement to LAist that LA28 had received the request. “We are working through those requests now and remain committed to meeting our obligations," she said.

    Read on… to learn what city councilmembers had to say about the situation.

    Los Angeles city officials are asking LA28 to hand over a list of its contracts, saying the Olympics organizing committee could be in violation of its agreement with the city.

    LA28’s annual financial report released last week included a broad review of the organization’s deals with contractors hired to help put on the event, but no names or detailed breakdowns of spending.

    The Games Agreement between the city and LA28 requires the committee to submit the name, type, amount, term and purpose of each contract it has entered into worth more than $1 million.

    No such list was provided in LA28’s report.

    “It's inadequate, what we've been provided, and that's not acceptable,” City Councilmember Katy Yaroslavsky said at a committee meeting on the 2028 Olympics Wednesday afternoon.

    Chief Legislative Analyst Sharon Tso said she has requested a full list from LA28 and is waiting to hear back.

    Jacie Prieto Lopez, a spokesperson for LA28, said in an emailed statement to LAist that LA28 had received the request.

    “We are working through those requests now and remain committed to meeting our obligations," she said.

    Tso told the council committee she had seen a more detailed list of LA28’s contracts, but only when it was “flashed on the screen very quickly” at a meeting with her, Olympics organizers, the city administrative officer and the mayor’s office.

    “So we don't have a list,” Tso said. “We don't have the names of the folks. We don't have the dollar amounts.”

    Tso told the council that Olympics organizers were wary about making contracts public, due to concerns that public disclosure could harm negotiations over competitive event sponsor deals.

    City Councilmember Hugo Soto-Martinez said that did not satisfy LA28’s obligations to the city.

    “They can just be like, ‘Flash it, we're done, and we did our requirement,’” Soto-Martinez said.

  • State scholarship program largely untapped
    A young student in a royal blue shirt sits in front of a computer in a classroom with holding a thumbs up. The computer screen shows the CalKids website.
    Eligible public-schools students can claim up to $1500 in an investment account to use for college.

    Topline:

    In L.A. County, about 1.1 million public school students are eligible for the accounts, but less than 20% of kids have claimed them, said Cassandra DiBenedetto, executive director of the California’s ScholarShare Investment Board. The claim rate is even less for babies.

    The backstory: In 2022, the state launched the California Kids Investment and Development Savings Program, also known as CalKids, and began creating investment accounts for more than 6 million kids in the state to use for higher education.

    Why it matters: DiBenedetto says kids are more likely to see themselves as college-bound if they know they have money saved and will be able to watch the account grow over time.

    What's next: The state is working with the Los Angeles Unified School District and other school districts to work on getting students signed up.

    The federal financial aid process opened this past week for students applying to college for next year. But for many California students, a source of state financial help remains untapped.

    In 2022, the state launched the California Kids Investment and Development Savings Program, also known as CalKIDS, and began creating investment accounts for more than 6 million children in the state to use for higher education.

    Babies born on or after July 1, 2022, can get up to $175 in their accounts, while low-income public school students can claim up to $1500.

    In Los Angeles County, about 1.1 million public school students are eligible for the accounts, but fewer than 20% of kids have claimed them, said Cassandra DiBenedetto, executive director of California’s ScholarShare Investment Board. The claim rate is even less for babies — about 11%.

    “The money itself, it has a long trajectory. So you have these newborns, and there's not a sense of urgency among some parents; they know the account's there, it’s been created. Parents are busy,” DiBenedetto said.

    There is no deadline to claim the money, which is already growing in the investment accounts. (You do have to use the money by age 26). But DiBenedetto says kids are more likely to see themselves as college-bound if they have it — and will be able to watch the account grow over time.

    “ You talk to second-and third graders who are like, ‘I'm gonna go to UC Santa Barbara,’ ‘I'm gonna go to Cal Berkeley,’” she said.

    The state is working with the Los Angeles Unified School District and other school districts to get students signed up.

    How to sign up

    You can go to CalKIDS.org to see if you or your child are eligible.

    • For babies born or on after July 1, 2022, you’ll put the Local Registration Number (LRN) found on their birth certificate. 
    • For public school students, they’ll need their Statewide Student Identifier (SSID), which can be found on transcripts and report cards. You can also call the school to find out what that number is. 

    Read more here: https://laist.com/news/education/money-college-trade-school-scholarship-calkids-financial-aid

  • City budget adviser says LAPD has enough cars
    lapd_car.jpg
    LAPD has asked the city to finance 300 new police vehicles for 2028.

    Topline:

    The city’s top financial adviser is recommending that the Los Angeles City Council deny a police department request to procure 300 additional vehicles for the 2028 Olympics and Paralympics.

    The breakdown: The report, submitted to the council on Monday by City Administrative Officer Matt Szabo, found that the L.A. Police Department would have enough vehicles to temporarily expand its fleet during the Games without the additional cars. The report found that more than 1,100 police vehicles not yet in use by the department were funded in the past three budget cycles. Szabo said those should be sufficient for the Olympics.

    The reaction: An LAPD spokesperson declined to comment on the city administrative officer’s report. Previously, the department has emphasized that its request seeks only to temporarily expand its fleet, with plans to retire old vehicles after the Games. LAPD has offered different estimates of the number of additional vehicles it will need to patrol the Olympics, from 300 up to 576, according to separate LAPD reports issued in recent months.

    Read on… to learn how much the LAPD request would cost, according to the city administrative officer.

    The city’s top financial adviser is recommending that the Los Angeles City Council deny a police department request to procure 300 additional vehicles for the 2028 Olympics and Paralympics.

    The report, submitted to the council Monday by City Administrative Officer Matt Szabo, found that the L.A. Police Department would have enough vehicles to temporarily expand its fleet during the Games without the additional cars.

    LAPD officials had previously requested around $31 million, arguing the additional officers deployed for the Games will need additional vehicles for their police work.

    But Szabo disagreed in his report, finding instead that the department would soon have a large enough fleet.

    “Given the current available vehicles and new vehicle procurements which have already been funded, it is not recommended to authorize the procurement of any additional police vehicles for the 2028 Games deployment,” Szabo wrote.

    An LAPD spokesperson declined to comment on the city administrative officer’s report. Previously, the department has emphasized that its request seeks only to temporarily expand its fleet, with plans to retire old vehicles after the Games.

    The police department has offered different estimates of how many additional vehicles it will need to patrol the Olympics. Two months after the LAPD asked for an additional 300 vehicles, the department released another report estimating an even higher need: 576 police vehicles.

    Either way, Szabo’s report found that more than 1,100 police vehicles not yet in use by the department were funded in the past three budget cycles. He said those should be sufficient for the Olympics.