Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Carson seeks $8M upgrade for huge visitor demand
    A man with medium skin tone and short hair wearing a gray suit stands in front of a white building with gold text that reads "Carson City Hall."
    Gary Carter, director of IT and Security outside Carson City Hall.

    Topline:

    The city of Carson wants to expand internet access as it prepares to welcome massive crowds for the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Officials have requested $8 million from a state grant fund that’s meant to help municipalities, nonprofits and others enter the broadband market.

    Why it matters: Having hundreds of thousands of visitors searching for a signal at the same time isn’t anyone’s idea of fun, and it could become a public safety issue. And it’s also an issue for residents — an estimated 1,000 Carson households don’t have broadband at all. The grant money would help the city launch a pilot city-run broadband project in unserved areas. Eligible residents could pay $40 a month.

    “It also signals to the existing providers that the city of Carson is willing to do what it takes to provide gigabit broadband for all of its residents,” said IT and Security Director Gary Carter.

    Why now: The California Public Utilities Commission is reviewing 14 grant proposals in Los Angeles County, including Carson, under the state’s Broadband For All program, with $105 million available for the area. Winners could be announced as early as June.

    The backstory: LAist recently found that telecom giants AT&T and Spectrum are seeking large cuts of available grant money to serve wealthy neighborhoods. Read more here.

    The city of Carson in the South Bay will be taking its place on the world stage in 2026 as one of the practice session sites for the FIFA World Cup.

    Top teams from across the globe will be training at Dignity Health Sports Park, the home of the L.A. Galaxy soccer team, which is expected to draw huge crowds.

    But there’s one thing the city is lacking — reliable broadband.

    Listen 3:46
    LISTEN: Carson Wants $8 Million To Improve Spotty Internet Before 2026 World Cup

    While there are some areas with good coverage, other areas are spotty. At just 19 square miles, one might assume that 100% coverage shouldn’t be a problem. But Gary Carter, the city’s director of IT and security, says the community has “historically been redlined as far as broadband goes.”

    “There's just a few pockets of the city where our current duopoly providers [like AT&T and Spectrum] have provided service that would be standard in other areas of L.A. County,” Carter said. “But a large swath of the city is either unserved or underserved.”

    He says existing providers are “not really targeting cities like Carson” for service the way they do wealthier areas because it’s not considered as profitable. The median household income for the area is $65,000. But he says residents are “hardworking folks" from "extremely diverse, low and middle-income neighborhoods” that deserve an opportunity to get connected.

    To correct this, Carter is helping the city apply for $8 million in grant money, part of California’s Broadband for All project, to create its own new broadband fiber optic network. The pilot project would serve about 1,000 unserved households and 372 businesses, with City Hall, the Civic Center and Cal State Dominguez Hills serving as anchor institutions. Winners could be announced as early as June.

    The city plans to complete its pilot project in about 18 months. Carter says the money would help ensure public safety during large-scale events, as well as offer an opportunity to have “something to provide to our residents who will weather hundreds of thousands of tourists coming through,” he said. “I think it’s only fair.”

    A soccer field, with small clusters of players on it and a small blue tent.
    A soccer game takes place at the Dignity Health Sports Park in Carson.
    (
    Zaydee Sanchez
    /
    LAist
    )

    Carter previously helped the city of Santa Monica launch a publicly owned and operated fiber network. The success of the project “serves as a model” for how U.S. cities can help foster competitive broadband speeds and rates.

    Affordable broadband

    Carson City Manager David C. Roberts Jr. said internet access became a priority for the city during the pandemic. He said it all began when Jawane Hilton, a then-City Council member who is now mayor pro-tem, saw a young girl studying in a fast-food parking lot.

    “[She was] utilizing her computer trying to connect to the Wi-Fi so she could get her schoolwork done,” he said. “And so that became a clarion for our city.”

    The new pilot program hopes to offer Carson residents reliable, affordable broadband, perhaps as low as $40 per month.

    For Misael Contreras, that would be a huge benefit, because she’s bracing for her internet bill to double in May.

    She currently pays $40 a month thanks to a federal discount program. But that’s about to shut down, increasing her bill to nearly $80. That would be a stretch for Contreras, who lives with her family in a mobile home park near City Hall. But she says her grandson needs Wi-Fi for schoolwork and to stream entertainment. They may soon need to explore new service options.

    “What I pay now seems very fair to me,” she said.

    A mobile home park from across the street.
    Bel-Air mobile park in Carson.
    (
    Zaydee Sanchez
    /
    LAist
    )

    Last-mile

    The grant fund is part of California’s Broadband for All plan, a multi-billion dollar state and federal investment to expand internet access in communities with little to no access.

    In a stroke of luck, the city of Carson landed right on the path of what's known as the "middle mile" — 10,000 miles of high-capacity fiber lines currently being built across the state.

    The "last-mile," as it’s known, is what will connect that infrastructure to homes and businesses, and it’s money for that that Carson is applying for.

    WHAT IS THE MIDDLE-MILE NETWORK?

    The state is building a new open-access broadband network called the “middle-mile,” which refers to the physical infrastructure that’s needed to connect people to the internet.

    Larger companies like AT&T and Spectrum operate their own private middle-mile networks and charge whatever rates they want. But with the state’s help, cities like Carson and other community-based providers could save on construction costs and gain internet access at wholesale prices.

    But advocates say that ultimately depends on who wins the grant money, which is up to the California Public Utilities Commission to decide.

    $105 million has been set aside for projects in Los Angeles County. Telecom giant AT&T applied for $35 million in taxpayer dollars — and LAist recently found it plans to use part of that money to serve wealthy areas like Bel Air and the Pacific Palisades. Spectrum applied for $2.5 million to serve people in the Antelope valley.

    But Carter is staying optimistic. “I believe we'll have a shot,” he said, adding that he hopes the majority of funds would be directed at projects that approach the issue in “novel ways.”

    A man with medium skin tone wearing a gray blazer with black pants and shirt talks on the phone holding a coffee in the other hand while walking in the hallways of a building with white walls.
    Gary Carter, Carson's director of IT and security, tries to take a call inside Carson City Hall.
    (
    Zaydee Sanchez
    /
    LAist
    )

    The CPUC is expected to announce the first of “one or more” additional funding rounds this summer, but the process could take years. The agency says it will award additional points to projects that commit to using the state’s new middle-mile network, as well as applicants that offer low-cost plans and other criteria.

    LAist will spotlight additional project applications, including an effort to connect more residents in the rural areas of Catalina Island, in the coming weeks.

  • EPA begins Superfund project in South Gate
    People in high-visibility safety vests stand near a graffiti-covered concrete wall outdoors.
    The EPA says cleanup at this South Gate lot could take a few months for the soil and a year or longer for the groundwater.

    Topline:

    Cleanup is just beginning for a contaminated industrial site in South Gate, according to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency officials who are leading the effort.

    Why it matters: The small, southeast L.A. city has three Superfund sites, areas designated by the federal government as highly contaminated with hazardous waste.

    The backstory: The site, known as the Southern Avenue Industrial Area, housed a screw manufacturing business for 30 years, then a carpet adhesive plant. Both businesses are now defunct and the site was designated by the federal government as a Superfund site in 2012.

    What's next: EPA officials estimate soil cleanup will take about two months. Groundwater cleanup planning will start in 2027 and could take a year or more.

    Read on ... to learn about the other contaminated sites in South Gate.

    Cleanup is just beginning for a contaminated industrial site in South Gate, according to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency officials who are leading the effort.

    The small southeast L.A. city was built on industry — in the early 20th century it boomed with auto, chemical and other manufacturers.

    That legacy also left it with three Superfund sites, areas designated by the federal government as highly contaminated with hazardous waste.

    The three sites are all clustered on a large lot framed by Southern and Rayo avenues. A residential neighborhood is nearby.

    “This site is less than 50 yards away from a home, so we want to make sure that we clean it to a point where we can feel confident,” said South Gate Mayor Joshua Barron.

    South Gate is home to about 90,000 people, the majority of whom are Latino. The median household income is about $74,500 and the state has identified the city and surrounding communities to be disproportionately burdened by pollution and its health effects.

    This site, dubbed the Southern Avenue Industrial Area, housed a screw manufacturing business for 30 years, then a carpet adhesive plant. Both businesses are now defunct and the site was designated by the federal government as a Superfund site in 2012.

    The pollution at this property was compounded by pollution from companies next door.

    One of the two adjacent Superfund sites was used by Cooper Drum Co., a steel drum recycling plant. A group of Cooper Drum’s former customers, including chemical manufacturers and oil companies, are paying for part of that cleanup. The other site, previously operated by an aircraft rivet and conveyor belt manufacturer, is still in the analysis and planning stages.

    Why does it take so long to clean up a Superfund site? 

    First, a site has to get officially listed. Then the EPA has to analyze the property to understand exactly what and where contamination occurred. Identifying who is responsible for pollution can take time, result in lawsuits, or not be resolved at all. If the responsible party is defunct or can’t pay for the cleanup, then taxpayers have to foot the bill. 

    EPA experts need to then analyze the site and develop a cleanup plan, and funding needs to be secured. The cleanup can take years, even decades. The federal government has been slowly working through a backlog of sites, identifying those of highest importance through the National Priorities List, of which there are 97 in California. Learn more about the Superfund process here.

    At the Southern Avenue site where the EPA broke ground Tuesday, analyses commissioned by the agency found widespread lead and other toxic contamination in the soil, as well as a plume of trichloroethylene, a carcinogen, in the groundwater.

    Officials say the plume has not affected the deeper aquifer South Gate and other southeast L.A. cities rely on for drinking water.

    In 1986, the city closed water wells contaminated by the neighboring Cooper Drum site.

    A person in a yellow safety vest points to charts displayed under a tent. Others nearby wear similar vests.
    EPA project manager Kelia Liang explains the cleanup effort in South Gate on Tuesday.
    (
    Erin Stone
    /
    LAist
    )

    “ The water is safe to drink,” said Mike Montgomery, superfund director for the EPA. “What we're trying to do is prevent it from becoming impacted.”

    EPA officials estimate soil cleanup will take about two months. Groundwater cleanup planning will start in 2027 and could take a year or more. The whole effort is estimated to cost between $45 million and $60 million, primarily through federal dollars.

  • Sponsored message
  • Tell us, and we’ll try to get answers
    Yellow caution tape hangs above beachfront homes flooded with standing water reflecting the houses; two people wade near a doorway.
    Flooding was an issue in Seal Beach in September 1997, a year when Southern California experienced one of its most damaging El Niño events.

    Topline:

    Forecasters predict that this year’s El Niño could be the strongest on record. LAist wants to help answer your questions about it.

    The background: Scientists say an El Niño climate pattern has already formed in the tropical Pacific Ocean. Warming ocean temperatures are on track to exceed even the historic El Niño of 1997.

    Why it matters: In Southern California, El Niño is expected to come with a lot of rain and high sea levels, as well as the resulting flooding, mudslides and coastal erosion.

    Read on … to find the form where you can submit your questions about El Niño.

    The summer heat may be sweltering at the moment in Southern California, but predictions about this winter’s El Niño show it could be the strongest on record.

    So the LAist newsroom wants to know: What questions do you have? (You can submit below.)

    We can tell you now that El Niño is a climate pattern that happens roughly every two to seven years, and is one of the most powerful drivers of the Earth’s weather.

    During an El Niño event, the central and eastern tropical Pacific Ocean off the coast of South America warms to above normal temperatures. The warm ocean adds moisture and heat to the atmosphere, influencing atmospheric circulation, temperatures and precipitation on a massive scale.

    El Niño typically results in mild weather in the northern United States and wetter conditions in the southern part of the country.

    In Southern California, we could start to see the effects of El Niño in the late fall or early winter. Generally, those effects include significant rain and high sea levels and the consequences that come with them, such as flooding, mudslides and coastal erosion.

    Forecasters say there is a more than 90% chance of a powerful El Niño event this year, and a 70% chance that it’s record-setting.

    That said, uncertainty remains around how exactly this winter’s El Niño will play out here.

    So as you gear up for an El Niño winter, ask us your questions and we’ll do our best to get answers in the months ahead.

  • Safety plan in the works so business can reopen
    A GKN Aerospace Garden Grove building sits behind a chain-link fence, with a person standing near a parked car in the lot.
    The GKN Aerospace facility in Garden Grove.

    Topline:

    The company behind the Garden Grove hazardous waste scare earlier this year is planning to resume full operations in late September, subject to an independently monitored, court-approved safety plan. The company employs 500 people at its Garden Grove facility.

    The details: GKN Aerospace said in a news release that it had permanently decommissioned the tank that set off the hazmat scare in May and forced some 50,000 nearby residents to evacuate. Removal of the tank is pending review and approval from state regulatory agencies, according to an emailed response from Salma Elshakre, a spokesperson for the Orange County Health Care Agency, which is overseeing the cleanup.

    Read more ... for more information on the controversy.

    The company behind the Garden Grove hazardous waste scare earlier this year is planning to resume full operations in late September, subject to an independently monitored, court-approved safety plan.

    GKN Aerospace employs 500 people at its Garden Grove facility.

    What happened?

    GKN Aerospace said in a news release that it had permanently decommissioned the tank that set off the hazmat scare in May and forced some 50,000 nearby residents to evacuate.

    Removal of the tank is pending review and approval from state regulatory agencies, according to an emailed response from Salma Elshakre, a spokesperson for the Orange County Health Care Agency, which is overseeing the cleanup.

    All of the toxic chemical, methyl methacrylate (also known as MMA), has been removed from nearby tanks as well, Elshakre said.

    What about the compensation fund?

    This week, the company also announced a forthcoming $100 million compensation fund for affected residents and businesses. GKN expects to release details on how to apply in the coming months.

    What's next?

    At least 39 lawsuits have been filed against the company in conjunction with the hazmat incident, according to a GKN webpage set up to track the fallout. The company pledged to explain the legal effect of participating in the compensation fund before it is launched.

    What's the community reaction?

    Garden Grove Mayor Stephanie Klopfenstein said in a statement that the city “welcome[s] this progress and will continue to expect GKN to address the broader effects on our community.”

    A coalition of community groups called GKN Out of Garden Grove Coalition wants the city to shut down the GKN plant completely. The coalition plans to release a report documenting the company’s alleged history of hazardous waste failures at a news conference Tuesday at 5:30 p.m. at 11300 Stanford Ave. in Garden Grove.

  • Trump admin prepares to revoke up to 200K visas
    Two men are standing in front of a white wall and an American flag. One of the men with white hair, stands behind the other man, touching his arm with his right hand. The man in the foreground is clapping.
    President Trump walks past Secretary of State Marco Rubio as he arrives for a roundtable on the American mining industry on Aug. 7 at the State Department in Washington.

    Topline:

    The Trump administration is preparing to revoke the business and tourism visas of up to 200,000 foreigners who have applied for or are currently seeking asylum status in the United States. If it happens, the move would be the largest single mass revocation of visas in U.S. history and would likely face legal challenges.

    What visas could be revoked: Unless challenged or revised, the State Department is expected to announce in the coming weeks the revocation of so-called B1 and B2 visas issued between 2016 and 2026 whose holders have sought asylum or are now seeking asylum, according to State Department documents. B1 visas are generally issued for business trips and B2 visas are generally issued for tourism, family visits or medical care. Most of those with asylum cases currently pending would be recategorized but would lose their status as business or tourism travelers, according to the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the revocations are not final yet.

    Why now: Since President Donald Trump took office for his second term last year, his administration has steadily ramped up restrictions on visa applicants — demanding more information about their social media histories, requiring the posting of expensive bonds for the processing of visas, and outright banning the issuance of visas to citizens of certain countries.

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration is preparing to revoke the business and tourism visas of up to 200,000 foreigners who have applied for or are currently seeking asylum status in the United States. If it happens, the move would be the largest single mass revocation of visas in U.S. history and would likely face legal challenges.

    Unless challenged or revised, the State Department is expected to announce in the coming weeks the revocation of so-called B1 and B2 visas issued between 2016 and 2026 whose holders have sought asylum or are now seeking asylum, according to State Department documents obtained by The Associated Press and two U.S. officials. The action will be taken in coordination with the Department of Homeland Security.

    “We are coordinating with DHS to identify and revoke the nonimmigrant visas of foreigners who have come to the United States claiming to be short-term visitors, but then file for asylum to stay here permanently,” said State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott.

    He declined to comment on the number of visas that might be revoked, saying “as the process will be ongoing, the number of revocations remains dynamic and will be done on a rolling basis.”

    The revocations would not necessarily result in their immediate deportation, the officials said. Most of those with asylum cases currently pending would be recategorized but would lose their status as business or tourism travelers, according to the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the revocations are not final yet.

    Since President Donald Trump took office for his second term last year, his administration has steadily ramped up restrictions on visa applicants — demanding more information about their social media histories, requiring the posting of expensive bonds for the processing of visas, and outright banning the issuance of visas to citizens of certain countries.

    In a social media post on Monday, Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau called out people who he said try to use tourist and business visas to get into the United States and then apply for asylum.

    “People in the US and all over the world are fed up with bogus asylum claims,” Landau wrote on X. “Asylum isn’t supposed to be a loophole to circumvent immigration law.” Landau cited the case of a Colombian citizen who came to the U.S. in 2015 on a tourist visa and then applied for asylum.

    B1 visas are generally issued for business trips and B2 visas are generally issued for tourism, family visits or medical care. It was not immediately clear from the documents or the officials how many of these visa holders are seeking or have sought asylum in the United States and would be affected by the revocations.

    Current applicants for B1 and B2 visas are asked to affirm that they will not apply for asylum in the United States and prove that they intend to return to their home countries.

    In the past 18 months, the State Department has revoked about 175,000 visas for people who have been convicted or accused of crimes ranging from drunken driving to rape and robbery, as well as for people who have spoken out publicly against U.S. policies, particularly in the Middle East.

    The administration has also moved to crack down on so-called birth tourism, a practice the administration claims is used by foreign pregnant women to come to the United States to give birth so that their child will benefit from birthright citizenship. Trump has tried several times to end birthright citizenship, but those challenges have been rejected by courts, including the Supreme Court.

    The State Department documents obtained by the AP suggest screening of current B1 and B2 visa holders began after the State Department received information about asylum requests from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.