With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
Little Has Changed When It Comes To Who Is Making -- And Starring -- In Hollywood Films

Our news is free on LAist. To make sure you get our coverage: Sign up for our daily newsletters. To support our non-profit public service journalism: Donate Now.
Earlier this week, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences resolved to overhaul its best picture Oscar eligibility standards because Hollywood has failed to become more inclusive.
A new report released Thursday dramatizes the problem that prompted the Academy's radical rules change.
For years, USC's Annenberg Inclusion Initiative has examined who gets to make movies -- and who doesn't. Lead researcher Stacy Smith says in the latest report that Hollywood has made only "paltry progress" in overall diversity and done even worse in other areas.

THE NUMBERS DON'T LIE
Smith's team analyzed the Top 100 films at last year's box office, as they've been doing since 2007. The findings? The studios have made "little to no progress" in those 13 years for female characters and for performers from some underrepresented groups.
The divide between men and women remains steep. Just one-third of all speaking characters were played by women in 2019's most popular films. Only three of last year's top films had a leading or co-leading role played by a woman age 45 or older, and just one of these roles went to a woman of color.
The numbers were just as fractional for characters from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups. The gap is particularly wide for Latinos who make up about 18.5% of U.S. residents, according to census figures, but just 4.9% of speaking characters on screen in top films.
LGBTQ+ characters and people with disabilities were nearly invisible in last year's most popular releases.
"The erasure of girls and women from underrepresented racial/ethnic groups, the LGBTQ community, and those with disabilities remains a hallmark of top-performing Hollywood films," Smith said in a statement.
"After 13 years, it is not clear what might convince entertainment companies to change. Despite public statements, the data reveal that there is still apathy and ambivalence to increasing representation of speaking characters overall in popular films."

SHAKING UP THE POWERBROKERS
The academy is trying to shake movie producers out of that diversity apathy, essentially telling them, If you don't clean up your house, you don't get to play in ours.
Under new Oscar rules, starting in 2024 a movie must pass at least two of four diversity and inclusion tests to qualify for the best picture statuette.
The new best picture eligibility standards call for at least one lead or supporting actor from an underrepresented racial or ethnic group or an ensemble that's at least 30% diverse. Another test is that a movie must have multiple department heads who are not white men.
The Academy will reward productions that have internships or training, marketing and audience engagement initiatives aimed at women and people of color.

IT'S NOT MUCH BETTER BEHIND THE LENS
The USC report also looked at who works behind the camera, and the data was equally bleak. One standout was Netflix, where female filmmakers are directing more than a fifth of its movies.
But among legacy studios, women directed fewer than 11% of the top films and they wrote the music for only 5% of those releases.
Interestingly, one area where women are overrepresented plays a major role in who gets hired: casting directors. The study found that 71% of the 1,300 films studied were cast by white women.
Warner Bros was at the bottom of many key measurements when it came to representation of women. The studio, most recently known for Christopher Nolan's Tenet, hired zero women to direct the films studied and featured female leads or co-leads in less than a quarter of its movies.
WE LOVE TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
The Palisades Fire erupted on Jan. 7 and went on to kill 12 people and destroy more than 6,800 homes and buildings.
-
People moving to Los Angeles are regularly baffled by the region’s refrigerator-less apartments. They’ll soon be a thing of the past.
-
Experts say students shouldn't readily forgo federal aid. But a California-only program may be a good alternative in some cases.
-
Distrito Catorce’s Guillermo Piñon says the team no longer reflects his community. A new mural will honor local leaders instead.
-
The program is for customers in communities that may not be able to afford turf removal or water-saving upgrades.
-
More than half of sales through September have been to corporate developers. Grassroots community efforts continue to work to combat the trend.