Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
LAPD Seized 1,000 Guns From A Home In Holmby Hills. So What Happens To Those Guns?

Over 1,000 guns were seized on Wednesday from a home in the affluent Holmby Hills neighborhood of Los Angeles.
Police arrested gun owner Girard Saenz on suspicion of violating California's gun law on the sale and transportation of assault weapons and .50-caliber Browning machine guns.
Saenz's home was raided after LAPD and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives received a tip about illegal firearms sales.
Saenz was released Thursday morning after posting $50,000 bail.
Over 1,000 firearms & one person arrested for 30600(a) PC, in one of the largest recoveries in LAPD history. How did this happen?
— LAPD HQ (@LAPDHQ) May 9, 2019
The LAPD & ATF received info that a person was selling & manufacturing illegal firearms, which led to a search warrant in a Holmby Hills residence. pic.twitter.com/9kWq4vuFnb
SO WHAT HAPPENS NOW TO THE GUNS?
Retired LAPD detective Timothy T. Williams Jr. said the size of the seizure -- and the fact that many of the guns were collector's items -- makes this a unique case. Deciding the fate of the guns will take time, especially since each gun will need to be individually analyzed.
"Each gun stands on its own," Williams said. "There's a lot of things that come into play. You have 1,000 guns, how much ammunition was there? You got to look at the totality of everything."
Williams said during investigations the confiscated guns remain as evidence.
And since guns are bought and sold frequently, confiscated guns sometimes have links to other crimes -- making them key to investigations.
Williams said, for example, if crimes committed decades earlier went through the appeal process, "then you still have the weapons and the evidence there."
If officials determine no criminal activity occurred, California law allows gun owners to petition to reclaim them. An owner must apply to the California Department of Justice for a written determination that they are eligible to own a firearm. As part of that, gun owners have to submit a Law Enforcement Gun Release Application (LEGR).
If a seized firearm that's allowed to be returned is not picked up within 180 days, then law enforcement can destroy it.
Despite the large size of the gun cache in Holmby Hills, experts said that alone doesn't make it illegal.
"There's no law in the state of California that says gun owners can only own five weapons, or ten weapons. Nor is there any such federal law," said Adam Winkler, a UCLA constitutional law professor who specializes in gun policy.
Winkler said there's been a rise in the past 10 years of so-called super owners -- "people who have dozens, even hundreds of firearms in some cases," Winkler said.
When laws are violated, weapons used to commit crimes are not returned, Williams said.
In those cases, a few things can happen:
If a gun owner unlawfully possessed the guns, or the guns were involved in a crime such as an illegal gun market, Williams said law enforcement can destroy them or sell them.
Guns can be sold to police officers through licensed dealerships that might have a facility on law enforcement property. The LAPD Academy has a facility where guns obtained in crimes are sold.
There's debate across the country about the ethics of selling seized weapons. Some critics argue putting guns back into circulation can lead to more violence.
In 2014, a gun owner in Washington State killed himself with a Smith & Wesson 9mm that local police said had been seized years before and sold back to the public.
Williams supports bans on selling guns involved in crimes.
"Guns take lives," Williams said. "We should be taking guns out of the system -- not adding them back in."
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.