Sponsor
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
The Frame

Filmmaker John Carney loves '80s rock; theater activist Larissa FastHorse

Still from the film "Sing Street."
Still from the film "Sing Street."
Listen 23:51
John Carney ("Once") makes a love letter to '80s rock with his new movie, "Sing Street"; playwright, choreographer and theatrical activist Larissa FastHorse chronicles what it means to be a Native American in Los Angeles through her play, "Urban Rez."
John Carney ("Once") makes a love letter to '80s rock with his new movie, "Sing Street"; playwright, choreographer and theatrical activist Larissa FastHorse chronicles what it means to be a Native American in Los Angeles through her play, "Urban Rez."

Filmmaker John Carney ("Once") makes makes a love letter to '80s rock with his new movie "Sing Street." Playwright, choreographer and theatrical activist Larissa FastHorse chronicles what it means to be a Native American in Los Angeles through her play "Urban Rez."

'Urban Rez' shines light on LA's indigenous people 'declared extinct' by government

Listen 10:42
'Urban Rez' shines light on LA's indigenous people 'declared extinct' by government

Larissa FastHorse began her artistic career in ballet. Now, she's a choreographer and playwright, but the job title that probably best describes her is “theatrical activist.”

FastHorse is Native American — specifically, a member of the Lakota Rosebud Sioux — and the issues she cares most about are prominent in her new play, “Urban Rez,” where "Rez" is short for reservation.

The story is told largely with non-professional actors in outdoor spaces, through the collective known as Cornerstone Theater Company. Cornerstone has launched a six-year enterprise called The Hunger Cycle, in which they premiere nine plays examining the issue of hunger — whether for food, a sense of belonging, or — as in FastHorse's work — for culture.

As FastHorse told The Frame: "The native people of this area are suffering from . . . hunger for their own culture because they're not recognized." In fact, many of the indigenous peoples now living in Los Angeles are officially declared extinct by the U.S. government. 

In "Urban Rez," a band of storytellers mingles with the audience, relating their experiences as Native Americans living in Southern California as they grapple with the possibility of federal recognition, at last. When The Frame's John Horn met with FastHorse, he began by asking her about the current makeup of indigenous people in Los Angeles.

INTERVIEW HIGHLIGHTS



L.A. County has the second densest native population in the country. The first densest would be the Navajo Reservation. There are still some 560-some recognized tribes in this country, and I would say there are probably several hundred of them in L.A.

How many of those tribes are native to Los Angeles and how many were forcibly relocated to Southern California?



Well there are no federally recognized tribes in all of Los Angeles and Orange County. According to the government, there are no indigenous Indians at all in Los Angeles. Of course, there are thousands of them here from many different tribes.

One of the things that the show tries to dramatize is the way in which Native Americans are depicted in popular culture. How important is it that, when people go to this show, they reevaluate the way in which pop culture has treated Native Americans just in the last couple of decades?



It's hugely important. Because the second most defining and damaging influence of this country, after the United States government, is popular culture. And the way that they have depicted Native people, the way they have written us in and out of the narrative of the U.S. culture selectively turns into history and truth, which is insane, but that's what happens with our culture.

There are important things that a lot of people, like myself, would not understand. Like tribal headdress. It's incredibly important and sacred, and yet the way it's used in movies or television shows is incredibly offensive to people who care about that.



Yes. I'm Lakota, and my people are one of the tribes that are often depicted in pop culture and history. We are a people that do use these headdresses. Every single feather that is on that headdress has to be earned with a proper ceremony and through extremely difficult life situations, either rescuing or fighting or doing outstanding service to the community. And to just throw something on your head to represent that is really hurtful. 

Can you talk more about your own tribal background, where you grew up and how you became a playwright?



Yeah, I'm enrolled in the Rosebud Sioux Tribe in South Dakota, which is the Sicangu Nation. I grew up primarily off my reservation in South Dakota. My dad worked for the state, so we were moved 100 miles away to Pierre, South Dakota. [That] was really fortunate because that's where I got my education in the arts, which I wouldn't have gotten if I had stayed on the reservation. I started my career as a classical ballet dancer, which was a long, rare, strange journey. I did that for 10 years professionally, and then I landed here in Los Angeles, where my husband's from, and I found writing through acting. I tried acting — it wasn't my gig. So I originally started in film and television writing. I had sold a couple TV shows. Again, it just didn't feel like my world.



And then Peter Brosius' Children's Theater Company of Minneapolis commissioned me — he found me through the Sundance program and commissioned me to write my first play. And I realized I was home. [Theater] was dancers with furniture. I recognized these people and I knew how they worked and I understand how stage works. So from then I studied on my own and I became a playwright.

How important was it in your earliest work that you address the things that are personally important to you, like tribal recognition?



Identity politics has become incredibly important in my plays. I think that's a result of living in Los Angeles for so long, and getting to understand the incredibly damaging and difficult position the federal government has put the people of this area in, in their quest for recognition. Most of the people here were declared extinct pretty recently, like in the '50s and such. So it's really a very new, painful, raw wound for them to try to be recognized again. That's something that's become important to me also with the rise of DNA testing, and being able to trace our ancestry. That has actually opened more problems for tribal nations because many of us did not traditionally define membership as something biological. For instance, my tribe membership was ceremonial. These are opening up all these crazy questions that we've been forced into by the federal government and the way they recognize us. 

As the play dramatizes, there are some incredibly arcane and punitive rules that the U.S. Government, and especially the Bureau of Indian Affairs, seems to have. There's one I was surprised by: that if a group applies for tribal recognition and they are denied, that's it, right? There's no appeal. 



Yes. That is currently the process we live under. Traditionally it takes 20 to 30 years to get tribal recognition. And in that time your application is returned again and again for edits. But once it's denied, you may never apply again.

Can you talk about how "Urban Rez" came to be and how it fits into Cornerstone's "Hunger Cycle" series of plays? 



Originally, Cornerstone had asked me to write a completely different play about community gardens. But along the way, Sigrid Gilmer's play ["Seed"] ended up covering that territory, so they asked me to come up with something else. I always credit my husband — he came up with the idea of hunger for culture. [It] made sense to me as far as the political issues that the native people of this area are suffering from; it causes them to have this hunger for their own culture because they're not recognized. They have no land, they're actually declared extinct. So they have a very distinctive hunger that is hard for many of us to understand.

And the way in which the play is presented is a critical aspect of its performance. [In downtown L.A.], the audience kind of wandered about in this space near the L.A. River and the Metro Gold Line. There are conversations that are happening that audiences can listen to or ignore. How important was the staging to the story you were trying to tell?



It was essential to me. As an indigenous artist, I've been wanting to do something in this format for a very long time. When I talk to theater people I generally talk about immersive theater, and these things that come from a Western tradition. But actually I was taking all these different indigenous theatrical forms and putting them together into one piece. Our pieces are traditionally performed face-to-face, on a human level and human scale. [It's] so that we have to see each other, and we have to relate to each other directly. That's how we pass on our stories, and I want our audiences to have that experience. 

It's easy for me to identify the ways in which my mind was changed, the ways my eyes and ears were opened. If you are somebody in the company, or somebody spectating who is an indigenous person, what are they getting that somebody who's not indigenous isn't?



Indigenous people who've been coming to the play have reacted incredibly positively to it. Lots of people said, It's just like going to powwow, only you get to eavesdrop on everybody openly. You don't have to pretend! But it's also been very moving. I've had several people, artists, give me gifts afterwards because they said they can't talk about it yet.

It's too raw.



Yeah. All native people are invisible in this country, have been written out of the narrative, or written out of history. When you're that invisible, to see yourself is an incredibly moving experience. It's been pretty deep. A lot of tears. More tears on this show than I've seen on any other show I've done.

Cornerstone Theater Company stages "Urban Rez" outdoors at Kuruvungna Springs at University High School in West L.A. through May 1.

John Carney's films are like albums, and 'Sing Street' is his most personal

Listen 19:27
John Carney's films are like albums, and 'Sing Street' is his most personal

"Sing Street" is a love letter to the music of the 1980s.  The movie — set in that decade in Ireland — is about a young teenager named Cosmo who starts a band to win over a girl.

The Riddle of the Model

The film was written and directed by John Carney, who wrote most of the original music in the film. He previously lulled audiences into a non-traditional love story with the 2007 film, “Once,” and he’s also a musician himself. Carney played in the indie-folk band The Frames with Glen Hansard -- who starred in “Once.”

The Frame's John Horn spoke with Carney about why he's so connected to '80s music, how his siblings encouraged him to be an artist, and how Carney views his films more like albums. 

INTERVIEW HIGHLIGHTS 

In "Sing Street," you really focus on what it takes to write a song — from going over chord progressions, to lyrics, to the structure of a song. How much of your experience in playing in bands did you put into these scenes and how important was it to get it right?



Actually, myself and Adam Levine, who sings the final song in the film and who co-wrote the lyrics to it, just met up last night and we were talking about that very idea. I sent Adam a rough cut of the movie because I wanted to make sure that things were working and that it was a realistic account of a musician's journey. 



I got positive feedback from Adam, who rang me up afterwards and said, "It feels like that was my band." You can't get better validation than someone like Adam who has been in a number of bands, including Maroon 5. He obviously knows what he's talking about and he felt that the film did a convincing job at what you're talking about — the chord progression, how you build the song, how you go from a naive post-school band or college band and how that works. 

Sing Street

I have a guilty love affair with bands like Tears For Fears and a-ha, and those are bands that are referenced in your movie. There are a lot of films out there that view the ‘80s in an ironic way or poke a lot of fun at it. But your film treats this decade and the music from this decade with a lot of love and respect. Is that something that was important to represent and reflect, in the way you heard music back then? 



 It does, and by the two first names that you mentioned there, I see nothing guilty about either of those bands. 

a-ha though... 



Actually, a-ha, they had a couple of hits, but their really big hit was "Take On Me." It's pop-opera. It's as good as any opera song. The vocal line — I dare anybody in this studio to sing to try and attempt the range of notes that the vocal top-line is going through at the chorus. But just to finish the point, a lot of the '80s is awful hair, awful fashion, and we were running — our generation —  in horror from that decade for so long. 



Now I'm 44, now it's okay. It's the same with our parents when they started to look back on the '40s and '50s and [say], Hang on a second, actually. It wasn't all bad. In fact, there's a sort of interesting moment in the timeline when a decade goes from horror — and looking over your shoulder as you run — to that moment when you realize this is my youth that we're talking about. 

Take On Me

There are a couple of adult characters who are incredibly supportive of their children making music. Was there somebody like that in your life — a teacher or parent — who celebrated the fact that you wanted to become a musician? 



Yeah, my siblings were the people in my life who from when I was four-years-old — doing handstands or drawing pictures of Christmas trees or banging on the drums — I was the youngest kid and I could do no wrong. So that is an incredible force of good in the world, to be indulged in everything, not being told no by people. Particularly, that was my siblings for me because your parents have to tell you no occasionally. 



Firstly, they can't afford everything you want, but secondly, they have to make sure that you don't fall off a cliff on your bicycling, or that you drop out of school because they buy you a guitar. Whereas your siblings, they have no preconceptions of who you could be. Your parents want you to be the president or doctor or lawyer, whereas the brother or sister doesn't give a hook as long as you're happy. That's what I felt from my brothers and sisters was that they were giving me permission to experiment who I was and to change my mind about things, which I think is very important to be given as a kid. 

The last three films you’ve made could almost be viewed as albums. “Once” is like a debut album — very personal and made with a lot of heart. “Begin Again” is the follow-up album after being signed to a major record label — it’s big and more ambitious. And then “Sing Street” is the album that returns a band to its roots — back to the “sound” of the first album, with more reflection and experience. Have you ever thought about your films in that kind of way?



In fact, that's exactly the term that we used to help not only sell "Once," but figure out "Once" in our heads, which was that it was a visual album. The music came first and the visuals came second. So I think it's an interesting way to look at it, and I think it's true that "Begin Again" was the difficult second album for me. 



It was the one in which the fans that we had built up on "Once" had their instruments out and were sharpening them and were ready to go at it. And they did and that's fine. I think you're right. I think "Sing Street," whether consciously or unconsciously, was an opportunity to come back home and go to the set an hour later because I didn't have to drive halfway across the New York traffic, and I could sort of be a little bit more of myself with it. 

“Sing Street” is in theaters now.