The state of California's water system, what the "strong black woman" represents in America today, ‘Ghost in the Shell’ opens to lukewarm box office sales
Drought to Deluge: Are we saving enough rain water?
California was in the midst of a years-long drought, and then the deluge hit.
That extreme weather shift put stress on the state's water system, raising questions about whether we have been able to capture enough to meet future demands.
Take Two talks with three of the state's top water experts to tell us what we banked, and how to improve the system for when the next storms roll in.
Guests:
- Jeffrey Kightlinger, general manager of the Metropolitan Water District
- Felicia Marcus, chair of the State Water Resources Control Board
- Buzz Thompson, director of the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment
Interview highlights
How did we do in swinging from drought to deluge?
Thompson: We probably did as well as could be imagined.
In this particular year, we did a pretty good job in avoiding the floods.
At the same time, we've taken as much of that water that has been available and have stored it for purposes of this year and future years.
How well was that water managed in Southern California?
Kightlinger: We've done a good job down here. Metropolitan has built up a good resource of storage options where we can put water into groundwater banks and surface water reservoirs.
We are looking at putting more water in storage in 2017 than we have in our entire history.
One of the challenges is that while we've continued building and preparing for droughts here in Southern California, you haven't seen that same emphasis statewide.
What didn't we do right when it came to capturing rainwater?
Marcus: I think we cut some things a little too close on fish and wildlife protection.
We lost a couple years of a three-year salmon run, which is really pretty serious, and the fishing industry is going to feel that for many years to come.
How do you figure out who gets the water between urban and rural areas?
Thompson: Some of the cities in the rural areas are highly dependent upon groundwater.
In the most recent drought, we drew down on that groundwater.
That lowered the groundwater table to a degree that those rural areas could no longer get the groundwater that they needed to supply their domestic populations.
What else do we need to do to make sure there's enough water stored up for the next drought phase?
Marcus: For small communities, there still remains the very large issue of how to help subsidize their operations and maintenance costs.
Some of these small communities simply don't have the wherewithal to pay for modern treatment systems, even if they do have water.
When it comes to storing, I do think that legislation is going to put us on a path to more sustainable groundwater use.
But we also have to think more and more intentionally, as many folks are trying, to find out how we can get that water into the ground faster.
What tools are already in place to help us store this water better?
Thompson: We have a number of reservoirs in California. They're designed both to store water as well as to avoid floods, which means keeping that space in the reservoir open so that when you have a big storm or you have that snowmelt, you're able to capture that and avoid the flood risk downstream.
So one thing we need to do is figure out how to better operate the reservoirs we have already.
That might mean, for example, you might have a reservoir that, if you're forced to release water from that reservoir, you might be able to store that water somewhere else.
The second thing is to create more storage capacity. We have a lot of natural storage capacity in groundwater aquifers throughout the state, so we have to start thinking about those.
That's both a question of making sure our laws are in place to permit that, as well as having the conveyance facilities necessary to move the water where it might be available to where those groundwater aquifers exist.
What are the things we need to do to store this water better?
Kightlinger: Probably the number one challenge in California is our conveyance system. We don't have the ability to move water where we need it to when we need to.
So we're going to need more off-stream reservoirs, and then of course there's the governor's California water fix, his idea of moving water to bypass the delta system through tunnels.
Listen to our full roundtable by clicking the blue audio player above.
Special coverage: 'Drought to deluge'
This story is part of a full day of special coverage examining what the wet winter has meant for our water supply. Check out the full coverage Monday, April 3 on...
Morning Edition: While a healthy snowpack will be good for imported water sources to Southern California, that’s not necessarily the case for local sources of water. Reporter Emily Guerin explains.
Take Two: Host A Martinez talks to state and local water experts about the lessons we’ve learned from the recent cycle of dry to wet and what that means for how we manage water going forward.
AirTalk: Host Larry Mantle takes listener calls on whether the wet winter has caused you to rethink water conservation.
All Things Considered: Host Nick Roman takes a look at how the sudden change from parched to lush backcountry has affected local wildlife and habitat.
On the Lot: 'Ghost in the Shell' fails to resonate, Academy at a crossroads and more
Over the weekend the film "Ghost in the Shell" failed to resonate with a wider audience and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences finds itself at a crossroads.
For more on the business of Hollywood, A Martinez spoke to Take Two's On the Lot guide, Rebecca Keegan. She's Hollywood correspondent for Vanity Fair.
Ghost in the Shell
The part fantasy, part mystery, part thriller starring Scarlett Johansson opened up on Friday to lukewarm box office numbers. This could be in part because of scathing early reviews but it might be in part because of the whitewashing controversy it was never quite able to shake.
However, as Rebecca explains, the studio did try different strategies to distance itself from the debacle:
"One thing I've heard from folks at Paramount is that they had done focus groups on this issue to see at what extent do audiences care about it. One thing that they found is that while it is a very talked about issue among folks like me, people who cover film, film critics, it's not as big of an issue for audiences.
So, I think they thought maybe audiences wouldn't care that much... and interestingly even less of an issue for audiences in Asian countries. Seems worth noting that this movie opened at number one in Hong Kong and Taiwan. It'll open on Friday in Japan and China, presumably do fairly well there..."
Academy changes
It's been a little over a month since the biggest gaffe in Oscar history and while the Academy heals, it also enters a period of change. It's been one of the most revolutionary eras in its history, and a change of leadership is on the horizon.
"The Academy is kind of at crossroads and I wrote about this for Vanity Fair last week. The president of the Academy Cheryl Boone Isaacs who has run the organization for the last four years is terming out, so she will not be able to lead starting at the end of the summer.
And the CEO Dawn Hudson has her contract up for renewal this month. These are two people who have really spearheaded the biggest changes at the Academy including diversity initiatives and the Academy museum, so it should be interesting to see what happens next."
Joss takes on Batgirl?
Joss Whedon is rumored to be poised to take on a Batgirl movie. He's got some cred when it comes to strong female leads and the comic book universe. This could be big for DC.
"I know Joss Whedon is the creator of the 'Buffy the Vampire Slayer' TV show, much beloved, strong female lead. And as you say, he's got an Avengers background, so this is him jumping teams from Marvel to DC. Big deal in the comic book world."
To listen to the full segment, click the blue play button above.
Your guide for Dodgers' Opening Day
Dodgers' Opening Day is here, and fans around Los Angeles are plotting their first visit of the season to the home of the Boys in Blue, Dodger Stadium.
To help make the most of your day at the ball game, A Martinez is joined by Jenna Chandler.
She is the editor of Curbed LA and she compiled the recent article "Dodger Stadium: The ultimate guide to L.A.'s ballpark."
America's complicated relationship with outspoken black women
California Congresswoman Maxine Waters found herself at the center of a unique controversy last week — not necessarily because of something she said, but because of a disparaging remark made about her.
It all started Tuesday. Fox News commentator Bill O'Reilly — himself no stranger to controversy — earned the internet's ire when he likened Waters' hair to a James Brown wig.
O'Reilly later apologized for the criticism.
Rep. Waters responded swiftly on Twitter and in an interview on MSNBC, in which she proclaimed:
"I'm a strong black woman, and I cannot be intimidated. I cannot be undermined. I cannot be thought to be afraid of Bill O'Reilly or anybody."
While there are many who might disagree with Waters' political stances, few would deny that when she does take a stand, she does so loudly and publicly.
Brenda Stevenson, a professor of history and African American studies at UCLA, says personal attacks like those leveled by Fox host O'Reilly are hardly new. She says that when black women speak out, they're often criticized, portrayed as masculine, and written off as "angry."
Stevenson spoke with Take Two's Austin Cross.
What makes a strong black woman?
I think that the notion of the strong black woman comes out of slavery. Black women were workers along with men and did the same kind of work that men did. And so, African American women have been thought of as being physically strong, but also emotionally strong because they've had to endure certain kinds of oppressions that perhaps all other women in the United States have not had to.
Sometimes it's a matter of perspective, though, right? A strong black woman to one person just might get stereotyped as an angry black woman.
That's certainly true. African American women in the public imagination often do come off as being angry or aggressive and that is the other side of the "strength" image.
If you are not a submissive person as women are — or used to be at any rate — then you are considered to be angry. Being in command of yourself, being in control of your job, being in command of your home if you are the breadwinner in the family or if you are the only adult within the household — that is something that people have often thought of as being angry.
And that really brings us to Bill O'Reilly's remarks about Maxine Waters last week. It got a lot of attention. You argue that you've seen this kind of thing before. It's shown up in history a lot. How so?
Often, when people deal with women who are in possession of themselves, who speak out for themselves, the thing to do is undercut the woman by making some remark about the way that they look. The way that they speak. The kind of hair that they have. It's a very typical sexist remark that undercuts the power of that particular woman at that moment.
Press the blue play button above to hear Brenda Stevenson's reflections on last week's exchange between White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer and veteran reporter April Ryan.
(Answers have been edited for clarity and brevity.)