Sponsor
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
AirTalk

Covered CA to hike premiums by 8.7 percent. What does that mean for your county?

Doctors and hospitals are increasingly asking patients to pay up front for deductibles, which can cost thousands.
Listen 1:36:43
For LA County, the expected increase in premiums is predicted to fall between 8.6 and 10 percent. We discuss the implications with health insurance experts. We also debate the Trump administration's new logging goals; review the latest film releases on FilmWeek; and more.
For LA County, the expected increase in premiums is predicted to fall between 8.6 and 10 percent. We discuss the implications with health insurance experts. We also debate the Trump administration's new logging goals; review the latest film releases on FilmWeek; and more.

It was announced yesterday that Covered California expected a significant hike in premiums by 2019, and for LA County, that means between 8.6 and 10 percent. We get the details and answer your questions. We also debate the Trump administration's desire to set knew logging goals; review the latest film releases on FilmWeek; and more.

Covered CA to hike premiums by 8.7 percent. What does that mean for your county?

Listen 21:06
Covered CA to hike premiums by 8.7 percent. What does that mean for your county?

On Thursday, Covered California announced an expected average increase of 8.7 percent in its health insurance premiums by 2019.

It's the same in Ventura County. In L.A. County that average is between 8.6 and 10 percent. It's 9 percent in Riverside, San Bernardino, and Orange Counties. State officials and advocates say some consumers will save money if they shop around for a cheaper plan.

Listen to the full story here.

With guest host Libby Denkmann.

Guests:

Peter Lee, executive director of Covered California

Chad Terhune, senior correspondent for Kaiser Health News and its affiliated news site, California Healthline; he tweets

As Trump demands more logging, we debate the effect on reforestation near Yosemite

Listen 18:04
As Trump demands more logging, we debate the effect on reforestation near Yosemite

In 2013, the Rim fire scorched more than 250,000 acres in and around the Sierra Nevada forests. Now, five years later, growing tensions center on the role of logging and reforestation activities in and around the fire’s footprint.

The tension comes at a time where timber production in California is seeing a steady decline. Meanwhile, the Trump administration is trying to change that by setting new logging goals. The California Forest Service is supporting such goals arguing that timber harvesting and salvage logging are cost-effective strategies that would reduce risks of future fires.

But not everyone agrees.

Activists opposed to timber interests are skeptical of the reforestation activities. On Tuesday, environmental organizations requested the Sierra Nevada Conservancy to halt logging and reforestation activities in the area until they get a clear scientific analysis of the effects these activities have on the ecosystem. They argue that reforestation is being used as a political tool to facilitate more logging. Environmental activists believe that the forest should be allowed to regenerate naturally.  

With guest host Libby Denkmann.

Guests:

Chad Hanson, ecologist and executive director of the John Muir Project, a nonprofit forest research and conservation organization based in Big Bear City, California; co-author of the book, “The Ecological Importance of Mixed-Severity Fires: Nature’s Phoenix” (Elsevier, 2015)

John Buckley, executive director of the Central Sierra Environmental Resource Center, a nonprofit environmental organization that works to protect water, wildlife, and wild areas within the Northern Yosemite region of the Central Sierra Nevada; former wildland firefighter for the U.S. Forest Service

The good news? Air travel is booming. The bad news? There aren’t enough pilots to handle it

Listen 8:33
The good news? Air travel is booming. The bad news? There aren’t enough pilots to handle it

With air travel expected to double over the next 20 years, there’s no doubt that the demand for commercial airline pilots will be strong. There’s just one problem: there aren’t enough qualified pilots out there to meet the need.

The demand is bad enough that Delta says it’s offering all its employees the chance to take an unpaid leave to go to flight school in exchange for a job as a pilot with the airline once they finish as part of a larger program to incentivize more people to come fly for them. Regional airlines are feeling the worst of the shortage, with carriers seeing their schedules trimmed and some, like Republic, even going bankrupt due to staffing issues. Many new pilots start their commercial careers with a regional airline before moving to one of the larger carriers like Delta or American.

What’s driving this shortage? For starters, the deregulation of the airline industry in the late 1970s which led to the birth of low-cost carriers. 9/11 also played a big role, causing many of the legacy airlines in the U.S. to go bankrupt and forcing many pilots out of their jobs, leaving them with a choice of either taking a lower-paying job with another airline or finding another career altogether. Many commercial airline pilots get their training as pilots in the military, but that need has decreased thanks to the rise in use of drones and other unmanned aerial vehicles. Federal law requires commercial pilots to retire at age 65, and the current shortage means more people are exiting the profession than are entering.

How are airlines coping with the pilot shortage and what are they doing to incentivize new pilots to join their ranks? What are people who might have looked at being a pilot in the past, like ex-military, doing instead? How much of an undertaking would it be for airlines to recruit and train their own pilots? Call 866.893.5722.

With guest host Libby Denkmann.

Guest:

Capt. Lee Collins, president of the Coalition of Airline Pilots Associations (CAPA), a Washington D.C.-based airline pilot trade association working to enhance airline safety and the pilot profession

FilmWeek: ‘Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again,’ ‘The Equalizer 2,’ ‘Blindspotting’ and more

Listen 34:24
FilmWeek: ‘Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again,’ ‘The Equalizer 2,’ ‘Blindspotting’ and more

Guest host Libby Denkmann and KPCC film critics Tim Cogshell, Peter Rainer, and Charles Solomon review this weekend’s new movie releases.

With guest host Libby Denkmann.

Critics' Hits

Charles: "McQueen" & "Maquia"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OjX3ZbsfbU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEWvRqZQ0RU

Tim: "Blindspotting" & "King Cohen: The Wild World of Filmmaker Larry Cohen" 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9-HBqVbtTo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPblr7nKaYw

Peter: "The Equalizer 2"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiaVnU18pcs

Mixed Feelings    

Charles:  "Love, Cecil"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xznzK0EOwfs

Tim: "Path of Blood" 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgPZjXs6058

Peter: "Unfriended: Dark Web" 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DJAWGXkvq8

Misses 

Tim: "Generation Wealth" 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyfC1AVhfb8

Peter: "Mama Mia! Here We Go Again" 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcSMdhfKga4

Guests:

Tim Cogshell, film critic for KPCC, Alt-Film Guide and CineGods.com; he tweets

Peter Rainer, film critic for KPCC and the Christian Science Monitor

Charles Solomon, film critic for KPCC, Animation Scoop and Animation Magazine

A look at film ratings of teen content after ‘Eighth Grade’ sparks controversy with R-rating

Listen 13:15
A look at film ratings of teen content after ‘Eighth Grade’ sparks controversy with R-rating

What does it take for a movie to get an R rating? Sprinkle in some F-bombs and you’re in for a winner.

The Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) classifies a movie with one of the harsher sexually-derived words in a PG-13 release, but a second places it in the R rating category. However, the Rating Board may rate a movie PG-13 by a two-thirds majority special vote.

This summer, MPAA slapped an R rating on the teen flick, “Eighth Grade” directed by Bo Burnham. The coming-of-age movie stars a 13-year-old socially awkward eighth grader who experiments subjects like hook-up culture and sharing nude photos. According to a study from the Journal of Adolescent Research, in a sample of seventh, ninth, and 11th graders, 32% of participants had experienced sexual intercourse and 61% of sexually experienced teenagers reported a sexual encounter not in a dating relationship. Perhaps teens can in fact handle the nature of certain films that illustrate reality for them, especially those with a 13-year-old protagonist.

Although “Eighth Grade” may contain profanity and sexual experimentation that can be inappropriate for young teenagers, is it time for a change in the ratings system? Teens under 17 must be accompanied by a parent or guardian. Do you think teenagers nowadays should be allowed to see movies with racy content by themselves? Call 866.893.5722.

With guest host Libby Denkmann.

Guests:

Joan Graves, the Senior Vice President and Chairman of The Classification and Rating Administration (CARA) for the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA)

Tim Cogshell, film critic for KPCC, Alt-Film Guide and CineGods.com; he tweets

Peter Rainer, film critic for KPCC and the Christian Science Monitor

Charles Solomon, film critic for KPCC, Animation Scoop and Animation Magazine