Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
NPR News

Glassdoor's new privacy policy stirs fear that anonymous posts may not stay anonymous

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 3:55
Listen to the Story

AILSA CHANG, HOST:

So talking openly about your pay inside the workplace can often be really awkward. But for years, the website Glassdoor has billed itself as a safe space for people to post candidly about things like salary, health benefits, toxic managers, all with the promise of remaining anonymous. But then a recent policy shift on the site now requires users to verify their identities, shaking the confidence some users had had in the promise of anonymity. Amanda Hoover is a staff writer at Wired, and she wrote about this in a recent piece called "Glassdoor Wants To Know Your Real Name." Welcome.

AMANDA HOOVER: Thanks so much for having me.

CHANG: So for people who aren't familiar yet, can you just describe what kind of platform Glassdoor is? Like, how does it work?

HOOVER: Yeah. Glassdoor does a few things now, but historically it was really known as a place where people could review their employers anonymously or maybe with a job title. And they could share their salaries, health benefits information and their experience there. What it is now is a much more robust place, where it has a social component, people can look for jobs and look at job listings on the site. So it does a few things at this point.

CHANG: But the fact that you could be anonymous was a huge draw formerly - right? - like, the idea that you could post with abandon without anyone knowing who you really are.

HOOVER: Yeah, I think that really encouraged a lot of candid conversations and made it a very different place from, you know, LinkedIn, which, you know, on LinkedIn, everyone in theory is who they say they are, working where they say they are and really presenting themselves with their face and their name and their title.

Sponsored message

CHANG: Yeah.

HOOVER: Versus on Glassdoor, where these were anonymized reviews.

CHANG: And then, as we mentioned, Glassdoor put in place some new privacy policies which really concerned some users, right? What has changed, exactly?

HOOVER: Right. It used to just be that you could use the platform with an email address. But now to access all of the features, they're being asked to input their name and their employer and their job title. And they're saying all these things are required. And when some returning users who have older accounts are logging in, they're seeing messages about needing to add this information as well. It doesn't mean that reviews will be - have names attached to them. You know, all reviews are still anonymous, and people can still post in social channels pseudo-anonymously as well. But these requirements for information are to be linked to people's profiles, you know, at least on the back end, with their name.

CHANG: Right, and you found that some users are alleging their names and information appeared in their profiles, like, in their accounts, without them having entered that specific information themselves. Like, how did that happen?

HOOVER: Yeah, there are a few people, you know, that have said on social media or in blog posts that they've logged in recently and found their name there instead of, maybe, initials that they had put. It's not, like, fully clear how that may have happened. There's a lot in Glassdoor's policies that talk about, you know, using tools to try to verify people and their employment. But it has raised concerns for these users who are alleging that this happened to them. And some of them have said that they're trying to delete their accounts, as that might be the only way to remove this information from their profiles.

CHANG: Gee. So what was the thinking on Glassdoor's part? Like, what are they saying about why they changed the privacy policies that used to be so central to why people join this platform?

Sponsored message

HOOVER: They didn't really tell me, you know, what goes into the thinking. Reading some help pages on their site, they talk about how, you know, being a verified network is important for these social interactions. You know, you don't want just trolls in these forums.

CHANG: Right.

HOOVER: They want this to be a place for useful information, and trying to verify profiles is definitely a way to sort of ensure that this information might be useful. But it does also come at a cost of how people's profiles are stored and the way that their contributions, you know, even if it's on the back end, link to their names.

CHANG: Amanda Hoover is a staff writer at Wired. Thank you so much.

HOOVER: Thank you.

(SOUNDBITE OF ANDERSON .PAAK SONG, "COME DOWN") Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today