With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today .
How Much Federal Funding Will California Get For Public Transit? Right Now It’s $0
Station excavation as part of the L.A. Metro's Purple (D) Line extension project in May 2019.
(
Courtesy L.A. Metro
)
Soon after the news that Congress had passed the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Gov. Gavin Newsom commended President Biden and other federal leaders, saying the bill “stands to accelerate investments in our clean transportation infrastructure, help mitigate some of the worst impacts of climate change and accelerate new projects that will create thousands of jobs.”
Newsom’s office expects California to receive nearly $9.5 billion through the new legislation over the next five years “to improve public transportation options across the state.”
But it turns out the Golden State won't be eligible for any of that green, according to Biden’s own Department of Labor.
The Back Story
Last week, the governor wrote to Secretary of Labor Marty Walsh, urging him to reverse a decision that will “cut off California transit agencies from billions of dollars in federal transit funding.”
Support for LAist comes from
The decision was reached by the Department of Labor’s Office of Labor-Management Standards (OLMS) in late October. At the center of the issue is the state’s Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013, known as PEPRA. That law has faced legal challenges in the past, but was most recently upheld in a 2019 ruling.
Biden’s labor department took a different stance, saying PERPA “substantially diminished the affected unions’ ability to bargain over future pension benefits,” which violates federal labor law, making the state ineligible to receive federal transit funding.
What California Wants
In his letter, Newsom calls the decision “a complete reversal” from that 2019 determination, saying it “has created tremendous confusion and uncertainty for numerous infrastructure projects.”
He goes on:
California objects in the strongest possible terms to the premature and inappropriate effort to unilaterally implement OLMS’s deeply flawed decision pending federal judicial review. I respectfully urge you instead to restore California’s access to federal transit grants pending judicial resolution of these issues. Withholding billions of dollars in crucial funding on the basis of a nine-year-old state law, while California wrestles with the COVID-19 pandemic, does great harm and injustice to the people of California.
A spokesperson for the governor’s office later told us the state "will continue to advocate for the federal transit resources that are critical to our state and workforce."
Support for LAist comes from
What's At Stake
Locally, the labor law dispute leaves billions of dollars in limbo, even as staff from the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority work to determine the impact that money could have on its major transit projects.
“It is of major concern,” said L.A. Metro spokesperson Dave Sotero. “It could affect projects we have under construction and our ability to operate our service at appropriate service levels. We are hopeful that this is resolved soon so we do not see an impact to our operations and construction program.”
Senators Dianne Feinstein and Alex Padilla also sent a letter to Walsh, asking him to “take rapid action to ensure the eligibility of California to receive transit grants.”
Asked about what this means for federal transit funding, Department of Labor spokesman Michael Trupo said the department “has certified all such funding requests, and there are currently no requests before the department.”
“It is inaccurate to describe this as anything but the appropriate application of federal worker protection law,” Trupo told us. “When other states have passed legislation raising [labor standard] compliance problems, those matters have been resolved by the department working cooperatively with the state, or a state agency, to address and resolve the items that would cause non-compliance.”
Basically, it’s in the interest of all parties involved to find a solution, and it appears they are working on that. A U.S. District Court filing from Nov. 12 indicates California officials will file a cross-complaint against the DOL and the Amalgamated Transit Union, or ATU, which represents transit workers across the U.S. and Canada.
Support for LAist comes from
The state also plans to file a “judicial stay of implementation" by Nov. 19 in an attempt to keep the state eligible for federal funds while the issue is litigated in court. The state's goal is for the case to go before the court by mid-December.
A representative from the ATU did not respond to a request for comment before this publication.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The Newport Beach City Council approved a new artificial surf park that will replace part of an aging golf course. -
The utility, whose equipment is believed to have sparked the Eaton Fire, says payouts could come as quickly as four months after people submit a claim. But accepting the money means you'll have to forego any lawsuits. -
The City Council will vote Tuesday on a proposal to study raising the pay for construction workers on apartments with at least 10 units and up to 85 feet high. -
The study found recipients spent nearly all the money on basic needs like food and transportation, not drugs or alcohol. -
Kevin Lee's Tokyo Noir has become one of the top spots for craft-inspired cocktails. -
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight.
Best of LAist