Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Here are the 10 California props we'll be voting on in November

This is an excerpt from Make It Make Sense, our pop-up newsletter that helps Angelenos make sense of the 2024 election. If you want monthly updates on what’s in store for the general election, sign up here.
We now know how many propositions we’ll be voting on in the fall: 10. Wednesday was the final deadline to qualify for the November ballot, which makes it official.
We also set a state record: eight measures qualified but were then taken off the ballot — the largest number in a single election year.
Here's a breakdown of what made it to your ballot and why so many ballot measures were withdrawn in the last few weeks. (Keep in mind that this is just state measures. We won’t know the status of local ballot measures for a couple more weeks.)
The 5 measures proposed by citizens
California allows any voter to put an initiative on the ballot if they can gather enough signatures to qualify. This year’s threshold was 546,641 signatures. Initiative supporters spent the last few months talking to potential voters at grocery stores, shopping centers and community events in hopes of collecting their signatures.
Raising the minimum wage
This would make California raise the minimum wage by $1 an hour each year until it reaches $18. The current minimum wage is $16 an hour. Many local governments have minimum wages above the state’s, including the city of L.A., where it's $16.78 an hour and will go up to $17.28 an hour on July 1.
Rent control
This would repeal a law, known as Costa Hawkins, that limits the type of housing subject to rent control. Right now, cities can’t impose rent control laws on any housing built after 1995, any single-family homes, or condos. This measure would allow cities to enact rent control laws on any of these types of housing. (This isn’t the first time a proposition has tried to repeal Costa Hawkins — a similar measure in 2018 failed by nearly 20 percentage points.)
Health care provider spending
This would require health care providers who are part of a federal discount prescription drug program to spend 98% of revenues from that program on direct patient care. There are no such spending regulations right now, and proponents of this measure say these rules need to be imposed to prevent misuse of taxpayer funds.
Reversing some criminal justice reforms
This measure would roll back key portions of Proposition 47, which voters passed in 2014 in an effort to pull back over-incarceration and reform the state’s criminal justice system. Prop 47 reduced penalties for certain crimes, including drug possession and theft worth less than $950, so that they would be misdemeanors instead of felonies. This new measure would allow those crimes to be charged as felonies once more. It would also increase sentences for fentanyl dealers and people who have been repeatedly convicted of retail theft.
(You might have heard that Gov. Gavin Newsom and Democratic lawmakers were working on a competing anti-crime measure, but it was scrapped at the last minute.)
Health insurance tax
The state currently imposes a tax on managed health care plans, which funds health care services for low-income patients who are covered by Medi-Cal. This tax is set to expire in 2026. This proposition would make the tax permanent.
The 3 measures put forward by the California Legislature
These measures require voter approval because they alter the state constitution or the way we vote.
New affordable housing construction
Right now, if cities want to issue general obligation bonds (which are mainly paid back in taxes) to pay for the construction of affordable housing or public infrastructure, they generally need a two-thirds vote to approve the bond. This proposition would lower that threshold to 55% of the vote.
Marriage as a fundamental right
This proposition would repeal a law in the state constitution (added after the passage of Proposition 8 in 2008) that defines marriage as being between a man and a woman, replacing it with language stating that marriage is a fundamental right in California. The existing law has been inactive since 2015, when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of protecting same-sex marriage. This 2024 measure would be the final step in getting Prop 8 off the books.
Prohibit forced labor
This measure would amend the state constitution to prohibit any form of forced labor or servitude, which is currently allowed as punishment for a crime. If the measure passes, it would mainly affect incarcerated people — they would still be able to take on work assignments in prison, but couldn't be disciplined for not accepting one.
Bond measures
General obligation bonds allow the state to borrow large sums of money, but they must be approved by voters. These bonds are paid back by our state taxes.
- Climate bond. This $10 billion bond would pay for several climate programs whose funding was cut in recent years due to the state’s budget deficit. The financing would go toward upgrading drinking water infrastructure, forest and wildfire prevention programs, combating sea level rise, and clean energy projects, among other programs.
- School facilities bond. This is another $10 billion bond that would help repair and upgrade school facilities across California. About $8.5 billion would go to K-12 schools and $1.5 billion would go to community colleges.
These are the measures that went away
People following the propositions closely probably noticed that a bunch of measures that qualified for the ballot are no longer on our list. That’s because eight measures were pulled off the ballot for a few reasons:
Reason #1: The measure’s backers changed their mind. It costs a lot of money to campaign for a proposition, so people who put forward ballot measures sometimes opt for a different route. This happened with one measure that would have repealed a part of the California constitution that requires cities to vote to approve affordable housing projects that use 51% or more of government funding. Its author, state Sen. Ben Allen, said there were too many other propositions on the ballot and that the Legislature was addressing the issue in other ways.
Reason #2: The measure’s backers worked out a deal with lawmakers. In the weeks leading up to the qualification and withdrawal deadline, state lawmakers and ballot measure proponents often negotiate compromises, where lawmakers agree to amend existing laws or support similar bills if the measure gets withdrawn. They made deals over six propositions (you can read about some of those compromises in more detail here):
- A measure to repeal a 2003 law that made it easier for people to sue their employers for violations of state labor law.
- A measure to expand a state program that provides health services and financial support for children with certain illnesses, including cerebral palsy, sickle cell disease and cystic fibrosis.
- A measure that could impose a 0.75% tax on personal incomes over $5 million over the next 10 years to fund pandemic detection and prevention efforts.
- A measure that would require public high schools to add a one-semester course on personal finance to their graduation requirements.
- A measure that would have repealed a state law and prohibit new oil and gas wells within 3,200 feet of hospitals, nursing homes and schools.
- A measure to repeal a state law that would have created a council to set working standards for fast food workers. Both the state law and ballot measure were withdrawn.
Reason #3: The California Supreme Court struck it down. One proposition would have dramatically changed how new taxes get approved by requiring a statewide majority vote to approve any new taxes passed by the Legislature. The court ruled that the proposal would “substantially alter our basic plan of government” and couldn’t be passed via ballot initiative.
Another measure that would have changed the percentage of voters needed to pass legislation was delayed to November 2026.
It may seem a little wild that so many propositions qualified for the ballot only to be taken off at the last minute. And, well, it is. Usually, only a small handful of measures get withdrawn after they qualify — the previous record was three, set in 2018.
Our partners at CalMatters sum up the backstory:
This is a relatively new phenomenon in California politics. Before a decade ago, citizen-initiated measures could not be removed once they qualified for the ballot.
But in 2014, the Legislature created a process where proposed initiatives and constitutional amendments could be withdrawn up to 131 days before an election. It was expanded last year to referendums. That opened up a whole new system of policymaking in Sacramento, with lawmakers offering to pass compromise legislation to avert expensive or politically perilous campaign fights.
What happens next?
The real campaigning starts now. That means your mailbox, your inbox, and probably your phone are about to blow up with unsolicited mailers, ads, and texts. Who’s paying for all that? Our election newsletter, Make It Make Sense, will have advice on how to follow the money this election. You can sign up using the box on this page or via our newsletters page.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline.
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.