Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
NPR News

Why The Graphing Calculator Hasn't Changed Much Since 1994

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

Listen 3:36
Listen to the Story

RACHEL MARTIN, HOST:

Many tech companies keep customers buying by constantly updating their products with new features. Here's a story of a piece of technology that has not evolved with the times and has been reaping the benefits. Stacey Vanek Smith of NPR's daily business podcast The Indicator from Planet Money has more.

STACEY VANEK SMITH, BYLINE: The movie reel becomes the videocassette becomes the DVD becomes online streaming. There is a name for this - creative destruction. It's the idea that the economy is always evolving, that there are new products that are constantly being invented that make old products obsolete. Mark Perry is an economist at the American Enterprise Institute.

MARK PERRY: Creative destruction is this continual and powerful and very positive force in a market economy that just reflects the dynamism and changes in technology and all different types of fields.

VANEK SMITH: But there are little pockets of the economy where creative destruction doesn't reach, places where being old and outdated is a competitive advantage. Consider the graphing calculator. They were first allowed on standardized tests in 1994 and soon became must-have accessories for calculus and physics students across the land. They were about the size of a Hershey bar, about four Hershey bars thick. They had a big screen where you could graph out equations on an X-and-Y axis. And they were cutting edge. More than 20 years later, smartphones and laptops have left the humble graphing calculator in the dust. But the dust has turned out to be an economic sweet spot. Peter Balyta is the president of education technology at Texas Instruments.

PETER BALYTA: We could easily add features to our calculators like a touchscreen, Wi-Fi or a camera, but we don't.

VANEK SMITH: The fact that the graphing calculator hasn't changed much since 1994 is exactly what makes it so valuable. If it were updated, there would be no real reason for it to exist.

Sponsored message

BALYTA: Because it can compromise the test security and really detract from what the calculators are designed to do.

VANEK SMITH: It took standardized tests years to allow graphing calculators. People worried the new technology would give students an unfair advantage. Today, graphing calculators are pretty much the only devices standardized tests allow because their technology has not evolved. They don't connect to the Internet. They can't communicate with other devices. And companies like Texas Instruments and Casio can charge a premium for this. Back in 1994, a graphing calculator cost about $100. Today, a graphing calculator costs about $100, which is expensive considering that now you can buy devices that will do far more for far less money. It also means many students can't afford them. And I asked Peter Balyta from TI about this.

It does seem like the price hasn't gone down that much and, you know, considering the technology involved, maybe should have gone down more.

BALYTA: You know, I will say that when someone's buying a graphing calculator, they're not just buying a graphing calculator. They're buying really a solution for a classroom.

VANEK SMITH: Graphing calculators can command a high price because they own a corner of the market - the standardized test takers corner. TI sells about 6 million calculators a year. And the graphing calculator gets a lot of love. Peter Balyta says students send him photos of their calculators all the time or wearing graphing calculator Halloween costumes. Apparently, they are very big in promposals (ph). And he has a theory about why.

BALYTA: I think it's a tool that they have had with them by their side when studying, you know, what are not always the easiest classes, you know, math, science, calculus. Those are long nights, and they require a lot of hard work.

VANEK SMITH: Or maybe they are just excited about something that managed to escape the forces of creative destruction. Stacey Vanek Smith, NPR News.

Sponsored message

(SOUNDBITE OF KETTEL'S "CRIBBAGE") Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today