With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
MRI Proves a Better Test for Some Breast Cancers
About one American woman in every seven will get a breast cancer diagnosis during her lifetime. But for five to 10 percent of the women who have genetic risk factors, breast cancer is almost inevitable. Mammograms miss most cancers in these high-risk women, but a study in the New England Journal of Medicine says a newer test is providing better results. NPR's Richard Knox reports.
Several studies have already suggested that women with a family history of breast cancer should be screened with a test that uses magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Now, the largest study to date, conducted in the Netherlands, says the MRI test finds twice as many breast cancers as a mammogram, and earlier.
There is a downside. MRI scans can lead to more false alarms and biopsies that turn out benign.
Specialists say that high-risk women should continue to have both tests; mammograms remain better at picking up certain types of cancer. Women with a normal risk are not advised to have the scan because of its rate of false alarms.
Current Recommendations
The National Institute of Cancer currently advises the following for women with breast cancer genes or high family rates of the disease:
-- Screening mammograms once or twice a year, beginning at age 25-35 (or at least 5 years before the earliest age at which a breast cancer has been diagnosed in the family).
-- Clinical breast examinations performed by a physician or nurse breast specialist, every 6 - 12 months starting at age 18.
-- Monthly breast self-examination beginning at age 18.
Copyright 2022 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
-
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight.
-
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious.
-
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress.
-
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.
-
Kevin Lacy has an obsession with documenting California’s forgotten and decaying places.
-
Restaurants share resources in the food hall in West Adams as Los Angeles reckons with increasing restaurant closures.