Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
NPR News

Cheney's New Chief of Staff Is Much Like His Boss

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 0:00
Listen

There's been a personnel shuffle at the top of the vice president's office. After Cheney's chief of staff, Lewis Libby, was indicted and resigned, the Vice President tapped David Addington to fill the role.

If Vice President Cheney is an aggressive, loyal defender of President Bush, then Addington is an aggressive loyal defender of Cheney.

"He's very much a reflection of his boss," says Bradford Berenson, who worked with Addington in the White House Counsel's office. "The same kinds of adjectives that you would think of in conjunction with the vice president -- smart, loyal, discreet, tough – are precisely the adjectives that anyone would apply to David Addington."

There have also been less positive adjectives used to describe Addington. One former colleague who would not speak on tape dubbed him, "Keyser Soze," after the shadowy, ruthless villain in the movie The Usual Suspects. (Addington is notoriously reluctant to be interviewed, and the vice president's office declined an interview request for this story.)

Those who have worked with him say he's not just devoted to Cheney, but to the primacy of presidential authority. Bruce Fein, a D.C. attorney who worked with Addington on the Iran-Contra Committee, notes that they both entered the profession "at a time when presidential powers were at their ebb, in the aftermath of Nixon's disgraceful resignation."

"So this mindset set in, 'We need to rebolster the president's authority,'" Fein says. "And I think that David has continued to retain these ideas, which I view as being more museum pieces now than reality."

After the Sept. 11 attacks, when Addington was counsel to the vice president, he had a chance to implement some of his views on executive power. People involved in White House policy discussions are not allowed to talk publicly about decision making. But they say Addington had a hand in nearly every controversial executive legal declaration related to the war on terror. Addington helped draft the policy that said terror suspects would be tried before military commissions. And he worked on a now-repudiated Justice Department memo that offered a narrow definition of torture.

Sponsored message

That makes this an interesting time for Vice President Cheney to promote Addington to chief of staff. "It suggests that (Cheney) is not in the mood to compromise," says Yale Law School professor Jack Balkin. "And he is not willing to back down."

The White House is now clashing with the Senate over detainee treatment. Twice, the Senate has voted in favor of an amendment that would prohibit "cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment of persons under custody or control of the United States government." The president has promised a veto.

Balkin sees Addington's appointment as a signal that the White House is responding to increasing criticism by circling the wagons. "You have a president in his second term in office. You have senators of his own party who feel less obligated to him," says Balkin. "They want to make a name for themselves. You're four years after 9/11, and generally speaking, the longer things go on, the more people are likely to take a second look at what's happening."

Balkin says that means Addington and Cheney will have a much harder fight on their hands now than Cheney and his first chief of staff, Lewis Libby, did four years ago. And those who know Addington say he's the type who will always choose a fight over a compromise.

Copyright 2022 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today