Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

USC's Coliseum lease terms approved by Calif. Science Center board

File: The Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum
The Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum
(
Andres Aguila/KPCC
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 1:23
USC's Coliseum lease terms approved by Calif. Science Center board

The California Science Center board of directors voted unanimously on Tuesday to approve a new lease agreement with USC allowing them to oversee the L.A. Memorial Coliseum.

This decision comes after the vote was delayed earlier this month. Board members decided they needed more time to review and revise the lease.

One of the biggest points of contention was the allotment of parking spaces to USC for home football games and other special events. Critics of the terms said that by giving hundreds of parking spaces to the private school, the non-profit museum would lose money on its own parking revenue, as well as making it difficult for Angelenos to visit the museum.

At Tuesday's meeting, the science center conference room was overflowing with stakeholders, concerned community members and affiliates of USC and the Expo Park museums. For nearly three hours, people spoke passionately about the lease agreement, many in support of giving USC more control of the Coliseum and its surrounding area.

Many speakers talked about the Coliseum’s heyday, and said they were confident that USC would be able to restore the grounds to pristine conditions. USC students and alumni made reference to the stadium's deteriorating steps and facade, saying that the commission who previously oversaw the grounds dropped the ball on maintenance and improvements.

Jim Baiseri came to the meeting to encourage the science center board to approve the new lease with USC. He said the university is not a "new kid on the block" and has proven multiple times to be a good partner with the city.

“USC has the capacity to identify and assess and be able to maximize and get efficiency out of the dollars that they are planning to spend," said Baiseri. "And it’ll be a more comfortable venue for the people attending and a safer and more comfortable venue in the long run.”

Sponsored message

Per USC's agreement with the Coliseum Commission, the school has has agreed to pay at least $70 million in Coliseum improvements, in addition to their yearly rent of $1 million. But some residents are skeptical about how this will impact them, and others believe the lease will only benefit one party: USC.

Community activist Kevin Brown came to the meeting to oppose the plan. A native Angeleno, he first came to Exposition Park when he was 4 years old, and remembers going to football games at the Coliseum when the Rams used to play there.

Brown said he's concerned about the impact on the surrounding neighborhood.
 
“If we live in a democratic society, why not put it to a vote among the people who live in the area," said Brown. "Put it as a bond measure. Let the people decide, it should not be railroaded through.”

The current lease agreement states that no more than 25 major events – meaning events with an expected attendance of 25,000 people or more – can be held at the Coliseum each year. This includes USC home football games.

When football games are held at the stadium, USC is allowed to use all the parking spaces in Exposition Park, minus 975 spaces that will be reserved for museum visitors. These same rules apply for up to three additional USC special events, other than football games.

Since the new terms were approved by the California Science Center Board of Directors, they will now be incorporated into the lease contract and a final approval vote will be needed.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today