Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

San Onofre cost for Edison: $317 million and counting; ratepayers could be stuck with the bill

A Southern California Edison sign outside the San Onofre Nuclear Plant.
Edison International, the parent company of Southern California Edison, reported over $300 million in expenses related to San Onofre's shutdown.
(
Grant Slater/KPCC
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 1:30
San Onofre cost for Edison: $317 million and counting; ratepayers could be stuck with the bill

The operator of the San Onofre nuclear plant says the plant’s shutdown has cost more than $300 million dollars and counting. 

Edison International, the parent company of Southern California Edison, says it’s racked up $96 million dollars on inspection and repair costs.
 
The much bigger expense has been the $221 million Edison has spent buying replacement power.
 
The disclosures came in Edison’s quarterly report to investors, which noted that it’s possible that the Unit 2 reactor - or the more heavily damaged Unit 3 - may never operate again.
 
The company also mentioned the possibility its San Onofre license may have to be amended.
 
Wall Street didn’t seem didn’t seem overly concerned by the disclosures, with Edison stock closing Friday down only 2 cents at $46.69.

An unanticipated cost of a couple hundred million dollars is a relative drop in the bucket for a company the size of Edison, according to Travis Miller, Director of Utilities Research at Morningstar.
 
“$300 million dollars on a stock with a $15 billion market cap is frankly, immaterial," said Miller.
 
Miller also notes that California is known as a very favorable state for utilities to operate. That’s bad news for ratepayers, whom he expects to be on the hook for fixing San Onofre. 
 
“Ultimately the customers will bear the brunt of that cost and investors will be protected from most of it," said Miller.
 
The California Public Utilities Commission is investigating who should pay for San Onofre-related costs.
 
As Edison waits for the findings, it’s submitted a $45 million invoice to Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, which built the steam tube generators. Mitsubishi warranted them for 20 years; they lasted less than two. 

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today