Protect local news!

Be one of 5,000 supporters to make a monthly gift during our fall member drive and help strengthen our nonprofit newsroom.
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Public comment window for Farmers Field environmental impact sliding closed

In this rendering released by AEG, the proposed football stadium to house a NFL team in Los Angeles is seen.
In this rendering released by AEG, the proposed football stadium to house a NFL team in Los Angeles, California is seen. It was announced February 1, 2011 that AEG has sold the naming rights for the proposed stadium to Farmers Insurance Group for $650,000, calling the stadium "Farmers Field."
(
AEG
)

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

The window’s closing for Angelenos to share their views about the environmental impact of the stadium project proposed for downtown L.A. A final public meeting takes place at the convention center Wednesday afternoon.

When the environmental impact report for Farmers Field landed at the beginning of April, it did so with a thud. It’s 10,000 pages long, with more than a quarter of it devoted to transportation impacts alone.

Stadium backer AEG estimates that 72,000 people will swarm the downtown area on game days. The company expects 15 percent of those fans to take mass transit, and another 3 percent to come via bicycle.

AEG has promised to attract fewer cars to Farmers Field than any other stadium in the NFL, though some environmental groups worry about how exactly the company plans to do that.

Traffic’s not the only issue. Lighting, noise and the carbon footprint are laid out in the report.

The meeting at the Convention Center will attract community, health and environmental groups, many of whom say they’re working down to the wire to complete comment letters full of compliments, criticisms and suggestions for how the project should be built. A few groups have asked for more time, but so far the city says Monday’s the deadline for public input.

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today