Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Prisoner's wife talks about her husband's prison cancer treatment

Larry and Teri Vanderberg
Larry and Teri Vanderberg
(
Courtesy Teri Vanderberg
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 14:55
Prisoner's wife talks about her husband's prison cancer treatment
Teri Venderberg’s husband is a prison inmate whose cancer was left undiagnosed for months until it turned into a stage 4 lymphoma. She describes a family’s agony at being out of touch and uninformed while her husband was undergoing treatment.

Update, March 8, 2013, 11:19 a.m.: Larry Vanderberg died in prison in February 2012.

Teri Vanderberg of Santa Ana said a year passed between her husband Larry’s first complaint of a swelling in his ear and throat and its diagnosis as lymph node cancer that was spreading through his body. His initial requests for an exam were ignored for four months, according to her and to a summary of his care that Larry Vanderberg wrote.

When he finally began treatment for the cancer, his family had difficulty getting real-time information about his care.

“My husband was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer in 2008," says Teri Vanderberg. "They don't tell the families where or when or where they will be transferred to a hospital for chemo – radiation, etc."

For security of inmates and others, prison authorities do not disclose where inmates are taken for medical treatment outside prison, said Terry Thornton, spokeswoman for the state Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

"Prison transport is generally confidential," she says.

Inmates may give permission for the prison to give information about their medical condition to specific people named in a release form, but some inmates fail to complete the forms, or the forms expire, or the people named in them move away, says Joyce Hayhoe, spokeswoman for California Prison Health Care Services, the federally-appointed receiver that oversees inmate medical care.

Sponsored message

As a result, some families may not get current information, but instead rely on other inmates to relay news of their loved ones.

Larry Vanderberg's release expired in March 2007, so when his wife and daughter were trying to get official information about him in September 2008, they were denied.

"[In 2008] three inmates called me on a Sunday to tell me my husband had been brought back to his cell very late on a Friday night from three straight days of chemo," Vanderberg said. "He was too weak to leave his cell for meals or fluids. He was delirious, and didn't respond when his cellies (inmates in neighboring cells) called out to him, to see how he was.

“They called me to tell me to report his condition to the warden Monday morning," says Vanderberg. "Monday morning my husband was carried by another inmate down the staircase into a wheelchair where he was taken by ambulance to a nearby hospital for pneumonia and dehydration from three days without fluids."

Families may call the receiver's inmate health care inquiry hotline to get medical information about an inmate. The Controlled Correspondence and Litigation Support Unit that handles the calls promises to acknowledge contacts within one day, and to provide a response within five business days, Hayhoe says.

The prison system has plans to computerize medical records but for now they are not yet kept in electronic form, so the unit's nine workers must get information sent to them on paper, via fax, or by scanning them into an e-mail, she says.

Vanderberg says: “His care from that point on was much better than what prisoners receive, only due to the fact that I was on top of it and was not afraid to contact Sacramento when I had complaints, which were many. My husband was diagnosed cancer-free 2009 – however, he said without my vigilant watch over what they do, he would never have received the care he did.”

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today