Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
KPCC Archive

Police Commission: LAPD Cops should be able to review body cam video before reports

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.

Listen 0:47
Police Commission: LAPD Cops should be able to review body cam video before reports
Officers will be allowed to review video before providing an account of why they used force against someone. The video won't be public, according to Beck.

After a testy debate about how best to monitor officer behavior, the Los Angeles Police Commission Tuesday voted 3-1 to approve Chief Charlie Beck's policy requiring officers to turn on body cameras during all stops - but also allows cops to view the video before writing their reports.

He said the policy will help him get buy-in from the force.

“You want officers to have faith in the system," he said. "You want officers to believe the system is fair to them."

Beck said the body camera video will not be made available to the public.

Sponsored message

The policy passed despite arguments by Commissioner Robert Saltzman, who wanted officers to describe why they shot or struck someone before seeing video, to ease the public's distrust of police. The Oakland Police Department requires officers to provide statements before looking at video.

“The perception - which I think is inaccurate but is widespread - is that officers are not always honest,” Saltzman said. “Given that perception, it would make more sense to bend over backwards to reassure a skeptical public by having the officer give a preliminary statement prior to viewing the video.”

The American Civil Liberties Union has argued forcing officers to provide an account before looking at video will prevent them from lying and changing their story based on what was or wasn't captured on tape.

Beck dismissed those arguments during Tuesday's meeting.

“The officers cannot alter the video,” he told the commission. “If they commit misconduct, if they have an out of policy use of force, the video will show that.”

He also said LAPD investigators will have the option to deny cops from watching the video when they believe an officer may have committed a crime.

Saltzman had another argument for waiting: he said LAPD investigators looking into the officer's actions would be more likely to find out what danger he or she perceived by obtaining a statement before they look at the video.

Sponsored message

“I find it quite frustrating that the policy does not speak to these issues,” he said.

Police Commission President Steve Soboroff pushed back: “I think you are articulately stating one extreme side of this argument.”

Soboroff agreed with Beck's argument that watching the video would help officers provide an accurate account of what happened.

The new LAPD police requires officers to turn on their cameras under a broad array of circumstances, including all pedestrian stops, traffic stops, foot pursuits, witness and victim interviews, crowd management and calls for service.

LAPD Inspector General Alex Bustamante praised the policy.

“I want them on and I want them on at the earlier possible point,” he said.

The policy allows for officers to keep cameras off during sensitive situations, including "because of the victim or witness's physical condition, emotional state, age or other sensitive circumstances (e.g., a victim of rape, incest, or other form of sexual assault.)"

Sponsored message

Beck said the video is considered digital evidence and will generally not be available to the public unless presented in court.

“As a general rule we have not released this type of information,” said Beck, noting he’s never released video from cameras mounted inside patrol cars.

The proposed policy was only Friday, which Saltzman said didn't give the public and commissioners enough time to review it.

“My frustration is that we should have had at least one hearing on the draft,” he said. Saltzman was the lone ‘no’ vote.

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Chip in now to fund your local journalism

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right