Sponsored message
Karen Bass vs. Nithya Raman: Follow live results in LA's mayoral election
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Orange County supes vote to adopt Laura's Law

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

Listen 2:22
Orange County supes vote to adopt Laura's Law

The Orange County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously Tuesday to adopt Laura's Law, which gives the county the power to force certain people with severe mental illness to receive treatment. Nevada County in northern California is the only other county that has implemented the law.

As members of the public applauded loudly, the supervisors voted unanimously to adopt the law. The program is expected to cost between $5.7 million and $6.1 million annually for about 120 patients, said Mary Hale, deputy director of behavioral health services at the Orange County Health Care Agency.

Laura’s Law is intended for a narrow segment of the population: mentally ill people who have landed in jail or hospitals because of their condition. It only applies to those who might be a danger to themselves or others, because they don’t recognize they need treatment.

Many in the audience wore "Thank You for Laura's Law" stickers. 

RELATED: Nevada County's experience with Laura's Law

About 16 people addressed the board before it voted. Most supported adopting the law. 

Steve Pittman, president of the board of the National Alliance on Mental Illness Orange County, talked of his brother John, who has schizoaffective disorder, which is characterized by paranoia, delusions and radical mood swings. 

Sponsored message

Pittman wondered if his brother's life would have been better if he had been forced to undergo treatment, even when he didn't want it.

A few in the audience opposed Laura's Law, mainly expressing concern that forced treatment would be a limitation of the freedoms of the mentally ill.

The type of treatment foreseen by the law is "unproven...costly...unjust, and...unnecessary," said Ann Menasche, an attorney with Disability Rights California. 

In response to the opponents, Supervisor Todd Spitzer said, "I draw the line with those who testify about liberty.You don’t have liberty when you can’t control your own destiny."

Hale noted that while Laura's Law would permit involuntary treatment, it does not permit involuntary medication.

Spitzer said that, since Orange County is just the second California county to adopt the law, it has a responsibility to other jurisdictions to measure its effectiveness.

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today