Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Metro board votes to deep-six 710 tunnel option

Improving public transportation, surface streets and increasing bicycle lanes were proposed by opponents of the 710 freeway extension this week.
FILE: The 710 freeway tunnel proposal has been the source of decades-long debate. Today, the Metro board voted to kill it as an option for making improvements in the area.
(
Ken Lund/Flickr
)

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

Listen 1:01
Metro board votes to deep-six 710 tunnel option

The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority board today unanimously voted to kill the 710 freeway tunnel option that has been a controversial project pitting communities against communities for decades.

Instead, the board decided to redirect funding for the project to other transportation needs, including street improvements in communities like San Gabriel Valley, East L.A., and Northeast L.A.

"I've come to conclusion it's not fundable," John Fasana, Metro board chair and Duarte councilman, said of the proposed tunnel during a packed meeting that drew hundreds of project opponents and supporters. 

The tunnel was one of five options considered by Caltrans and Metro to build a north-south connection between the busy 10 and 210 freeways through the heart of the San Gabriel Valley, extending the 710 freeway between Alhambra and Pasadena. It had been estimated to cost between $3 billion and $5 billion.

While communities like Alhambra and Rosemead have pushed for a tunnel, saying it would ease cut-through traffic on their streets, cities like Pasadena and South Pasadena fiercely opposed it, arguing it would only create more traffic and destroy their neighborhoods.

L.A. Mayor Eric Garcetti echoed many tunnel critics in saying building freeways is not a 21st century solution to traffic issues. He said officials have had to make tough choices between building freeway connections and destroying communities, and there has been a long history of that in urban areas.

Hilda Solis, Metro board member and L.A. County supervisor, said taking the tunnel option off the table will bring environmental justice to long neglected areas in the San Gabriel Valley and East LA.

Sponsored message

"This day will be remembered by many," she said.

This story will be updated.

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today