With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
Metro board may vote to take controversial 710 tunnel proposal off the table
FILE: Early morning traffic jams the entrance to the 710 Freeway Wednesday April 21, 2010 in Alhambra, California.
(
Nick Ut/AP
)
The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority board this week is scheduled to take up the project that has inspired considerable debate over half a century: the 710 tunnel proposal.
The tunnel would extend the 710 freeway between Alhambra and Pasadena. While communities like Alhambra and Rosemead have pushed for a tunnel, saying it would ease cut-through traffic on their streets, cities like Pasadena and South Pasadena have fiercely opposed it, arguing it would only create more traffic and destroy their neighborhoods.
The proposal is one of five options considered by Caltrans and Metro to build a north-south connection between the busy 10 and 210 freeways through the heart of the San Gabriel Valley. It’s been estimated to cost between $3 billion and $5 billion.
Metro currently has a fraction of that sum allocated to the project, through revenues from Measure R, a voter-approved sales tax that passed in 2008. John Fasana, Metro board chair and Duarte councilman, isn’t sure the agency can make up the difference.
Sponsored message
"To me, it seems that the path has run out to obtain the funding and the resources needed to get this thing done," Fasana said at a meeting of Metro's Ad Hoc Congestion, Highways and Roads Committee last week.
Fasana introduced a motion proposing Metro scrap the tunnel idea. He cited legal concerns that risk tying up any efforts to fund the project through a private partnership, which had been the hope of many tunnel backers.
He suggested Metro instead use the project's existing funds on smaller fixes to reduce traffic in the area, such as synchronizing lights. The rest of the money, he said, could be used to improve mobility in the San Gabriel Valley, such as with transit or bike infrastructure projects.
The full Metro board will take up Fasana's motion at its meeting on Thursday.
The board will also hear a presentation by Metro staff that recommends the tunnel as the best of the five alternatives; the analysis indicated it would reduce congestion on surface streets the most.
Fasana's proposal follows an effort by state Assemblyman Chris Holden (D-Pasadena) to push a bill that would also rule out a tunnel option. So far, the measure has failed to pass out of committee in the Assembly, although it may be reconsidered in the future.
Metro and Caltrans are expected to make their final recommendations on the project by early next year.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
