Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Loss of $50 million leaves Ballona Wetlands with uncertain future

This part of the Ballona Wetland Ecological Reserve is visible up-close only to guided educational tours and scientists.
This part of the Ballona Wetland Ecological Reserve is visible up-close only to guided educational tours and scientists.
(
Molly Peterson/KPCC
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 0:57
Loss of $50 million leaves Ballona Wetlands with uncertain future

A high-profile charitable foundation has backed out of a project to restore the Ballona Wetlands Ecological Reserve — a departure that could mean a loss of $50 million dollars for the last coastal wetlands in Los Angeles County.

The Ballona Wetlands is a 600-acre patch of land and salt marsh between Marina Del Rey and Playa Del Rey. Much of the property is buried under dredged dirt, concrete and litter.

Efforts to restore the wetlands have been underway for decades, but little headway has been made. Some proposed plans have been strongly opposed by community and environmental groups.

A partnership consisting of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, the California Coastal Commission and the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission has been conducting an environmental impact report of several alternatives for improving the site.

The Annenberg Foundation, which announced this week that it was suspending its participation in the project, would have given $50 million dollars to restoration plans that included a 46,000-square-foot visitors’ center.

The center was a point of contention for many because of plans to house a pet adoption facility there.

Jordan Traverso, a spokeswoman for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, said the environmental impact report would continue but that it was unclear at this point what would be included.

Sponsored message

“There’s so much that’s already gone into this restoration and so many other partners involved that the EIR will move forward, but what that looks like, I don’t know,” Traverso said.

She said that many consider some form of education and interpretive center as important for teaching future visitors about the wetland area.

Of the seven proposed alternatives for the project, four include a visitors’ center onsite. One of the alternatives includes plans for a center off the property. Another alternative envisions no changes to the existing site. 

“I don’t know at this point if we’re going to strip the ones that have the interpretive center in it or just leave them in there in the event there’s still a possibility of an interpretive center sometime in the future,” Traverso said.

The remaining partner organizations released a statement this week saying that the Annenberg Foundation was suspending its participation due to “a comprehensive evaluation of all the community-development projects it is involved in, that resulted in a re-prioritization of resources and focus.”

Some environmental groups welcomed the announcement, saying the proposed project was misdirected.

“This project was never going to work in an ecological reserve,” said Walter Lamb, president of the Ballona Wetlands Land Trust in a released statement. “All the signs of inevitable failure were there from the outset, but the project team unfortunately ignored them and closed themselves off from what would could have been useful public feedback. The result is a regrettable squandering of precious time, money and credibility that represents a significant setback for this remarkable ecosystem.”

Sponsored message

Other groups, however, said they were disappointed by the Annenberg Foundation’s decision.

“It was disappointing news to hear about, and we hope that they’re going to come back into this project down the road,” said Lisa Fimiani, executive director of the nonprofit Friends of Ballona Wetlands. “I think they’ve been a wonderful partner up until now.”

Fimiani said that her organization would continue working towards a viable restoration plan, despite the setback.

“We’re not going to let this stop us. We know what has to be done out there, and I know that we’re going to find a way to push forward,” Fimiani said.

The Annenberg Foundation did not respond to requests for comment. 

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right