Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Los Angeles approves $30 million settlement in gang injunction case

File: Los Angeles City Attorney Carmen Trutanich (L) surrounded by Skid Row activists as he tries to announce a new civil injunction against several dozen individuals, including gang members, in an attempt to stem drug activity in the Skid Row area of Los Angeles on April 7, 2010.
File: Los Angeles City Attorney Carmen Trutanich (L) surrounded by Skid Row activists as he tries to announce a new civil injunction against several dozen individuals, including gang members, in an attempt to stem drug activity in the Skid Row area of Los Angeles on April 7, 2010.
(
Mark Ralston/AFP/Getty Images
)

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

The Los Angeles City Council approved a $30 million settlement involving gang injunctions that affects nearly 6,000 Angelenos, according to a press release.

The federal class action case started as a lawsuit by Christian Rodriguez and Alberto Cazare, two L.A. men arrested for curfew violations in Mar Vista in 2009, the press release said. The area had a gang injunction in place, but the two men were allegedly not in a gang — an issue attorney Anne Richardson said is common with injunctions. 

“A lot of people get sucked in gang injunctions just because of where they live, and they happen to know somebody,” Richardson told KPCC. 

In 2015 a judge ruled the city had acted unconstitutionally by arresting Rodriguez and Cazare and approved the class action lawsuit that was settled Monday, the press release states. The 6,000 people whose rights were found to be violated are compiled from 26 different gang injunctions 

Richardson, co-lead attorney in the case, said that injunctions that placed a curfew on the gang members it listed were unconstitutional. 

The settlement will create a mechanism for people listed on injunctions to get their names taken off. Richardson said some people in the case have had their name on an injunction since as early as 2000. The $30 million will go toward providing job training and apprenticeships to the 6,000 affected. They also have the option to pass along the training to a family member.

"The hope is that this settlement will really show one way for cities to provide a process for people to get off the gang injunction. Whether they ever should've been in the injunction or not, they deserve the opportunity to show that they no longer should be on the injunction," Richardson said.

The court needs to approve the settlement before it becomes official. Richardson said that the case will likely be resolved by the summer. 

Sponsored message
One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today