With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
Judge throws out Temecula's lawsuit against Pechanga Indian tribe
Temecula's Pechanga Resort & Casino at night
(
Chris "LA Wad"/Flickr (Creative Commons-licensed)
)
Listen
0:57
Judge throws out Temecula's lawsuit against Pechanga Indian tribe
Judge throws out Temecula's lawsuit against Pechanga Indian tribe
A federal judge has thrown out Temecula’s lawsuit against the Pechanga Indian tribe. Temecula had sued the tribe over fees for services it provided to the casino and hotel complex.
The city had claimed tribal leaders reneged on a $2 million annual payment for police and other services at the Pechanga Resort and Casino. That agreement came after California voters approved measures three years ago that allowed tribes to expand gaming operations.
The measures ensured that tribes would pay bigger fees to cover the impacts of casino expansion. Pechanga agreed to the annual payouts, and to contribute $10 million to a freeway project, but only after it had significantly grown its gaming operation.
That hasn’t happened. The tribe also says it can’t cement any agreement with Temecula without Riverside County’s approval.
Sponsored message
Last month, California pulled out of the lawsuit against Pechanga, saying compacts with gaming tribes require the state to resolve disputes before going to court. The federal judge who dismissed the lawsuit says the state’s compact had to authorize such lawsuits and call for an environmental impact study.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
