Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

LA Sheriff's Antelope Valley settlement agreement in AG's crosshairs

Shortly after his swearing in, new L.A. Sheriff Jim McDonnell said he's happy to hear about the White House's plan to use federal funding to supply body cameras to officers.
L.A. County Sheriff Jim McDonnell. The federal consent decree grew out of the Justice Department's conclusion that his deputies engaged in ongoing unconstitutional conduct in the Antelope Valley.
(
Erika Aguilar/ KPCC
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 0:51
LA Sheriff's Antelope Valley settlement agreement in AG's crosshairs

The review of federal agreements with law enforcement ordered by Attorney General Jeff Sessions appears to include the agreement designed to end alleged misconduct by Los Angeles County Sheriff's Deputies in the Antelope Valley.

That has raised concerns among some Antelope Valley law enforcement watchdogs, who say the agreement has done some good. 

Four years ago, the Justice Department found Sheriff’s deputies in the Antelope Valley were engaged in "widespread" harassment of the mostly minority residents of low-income housing. Justice concluded that deputies "engaged in a pattern or practice of misconduct" that included "the use of unreasonable force" and unconstitutional pedestrian and vehicles stops, some of which "appeared motivated by racial bias."

In 2015, the sheriff agreed to sweeping reforms, including better training, a new policy on use of force and measures to prevent "biased or discriminatory conduct."

"Things have gotten a lot better," said Reverend V. Jesse Smith, who lobbied for federal intervention.

But deputies still sometimes harass minorities or treat them rudely, he said. "That still happens."

That's why the settlement agreement should stay in place, said Smith.

Sponsored message

The Sheriff’s Department declined to comment.

The settlement agreement differs from a consent decree mainly in that a federal judge issues a consent decree and is the final arbiter regarding compliance.

It was a federal consent decree in the wake of the Rampart scandal that played a key role in transforming the LAPD, said attorney Gerald Chaleff, who oversaw implementation of the decree. 

"It required the LAPD to do things it otherwise would not have done," said Chaleff, who now consults with other police departments operating under federal consent decrees.

Under its consent decree, the LAPD tightened its use of force policy, created strict protocols for use of force investigations and dramatically improved training. It also created a sophisticated computer program to provide an early warning about officers who may have problems with use of force.

Consent decrees provide "an outside view of what’s going on in a department," said Chaleff. They also force cities and counties to spend money on reforms to avoid being in contempt of court.

Sessions has suggested the current decrees around the country amount to unnecessary  federal meddling in local police departments. He’s argued the bad behavior of a few cops should not force dramatic changes at otherwise solid agencies.

Sponsored message

This story has been updated. An earlier version incorrectly characterized the Antelope Valley settlement agreement as a consent decree.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right