With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
LA Police Commission recommendations emphasize avoiding the use of deadly force

In a move that's already provoking contention among police experts, two Los Angeles police commissioners Friday called for changes to policies on when LAPD officers should use deadly force.
Their recommendations, which call for police to shoot to kill only "when reasonable alternatives have been exhausted or appear impracticable," go before the full Police Commission on Tuesday.
If passed, the recommendations by Commission President Matt Johnson and Commissioner Robert Saltzman would change how police are trained to use deadly force in Los Angeles, as well as the way incidents like officer-involved shootings are investigated and evaluated.
When determining whether an officer-involved shooting is in policy, commissioners operating under the proposed policy changes would look at whether officers tried other means to diffuse the situation.
“Currently, there is no specific evaluation of whether deescalation was feasible and whether the officer’s actions in fact tried to deescalate the situation," Johnson told KPCC Friday. "These recommendations are really to embed the importance of deescalation throughout all facets of the organization."
LAPD Chief Charlie Beck, in a statement, said he and the department "look forward to further incorporating these preservation of life principles in our constantly evolving training standards and policies." The chief also noted the department has been teaching deescalation to its officers for years.
LAPD, one of the largest police forces in the country, has the potential to set the tone for what constitutes acceptable force by police departments nationwide, Johnson said.
But some see the proposal as impractical.
"These recommendations give me great pause," said David Klinger, professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of Missouri-Saint Louis. "I'm concerned about the immediate effect on public safety in Los Angeles."
Klinger, a former LAPD officer, said officers would be less willing to take risks to protect the public, like getting into foot pursuits, for fear of getting into a shooting and having their every action judged in hindsight by a panel.
"The commission doesn't understand human nature," Klinger said.
But Johnson said something needs to change.
"The use of deadly force should always be a last resort," he said. "We're not asking (officers) to endanger their lives, but if these strategies are implemented correctly, it should keep both our officers and the community safer."
The proposal comes on the heels of a KPCC investigation into officer-involved shootings in Los Angeles County over a five-year period. KPCC found that one in four people shot by police between 2010-2014 were unarmed.
An LAPD report released last week showed a dramatic increase in the number of people shot by LAPD officers who showed sings of mental illness in 2015.
Johnson said many of those shot were homeless.
One of the aims of his and Saltzman's proposal is to ensure that officers working with the homeless have proper tools for dealing with that population.
"Specifically officers that work in Skid Row, that they have specialized training for dealing with those communities before engaging in any enforcement action," Johnson said.
The proposal, if adopted, would also require LAPD to notify commissioners of any changes to training of officers regarding mental health, use of force, and de-escalation.
This story has been updated.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
What do stairs have to do with California’s housing crisis? More than you might think, says this Culver City councilmember.
-
Yes, it's controversial, but let me explain.
-
Doctors say administrator directives allow immigration agents to interfere in medical decisions and compromise medical care.
-
The Palisades Fire erupted on Jan. 7 and went on to kill 12 people and destroy more than 6,800 homes and buildings.
-
People moving to Los Angeles are regularly baffled by the region’s refrigerator-less apartments. They’ll soon be a thing of the past.
-
Experts say students shouldn't readily forgo federal aid. But a California-only program may be a good alternative in some cases.