This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.
This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.
Los Angeles moves to privatize city parking structures
Los Angeles city workers pack City Hall. They asked the City Council to avoid extending unpaid furlough days and layoffs. The city faces a current $62 million shortfall, and a projected $350 million deficit for the fiscal year that starts July 1.
(
Frank Stoltze/KPCC
)
L.A. city firefighters were among those who attended a City Council meeting. L.A. faces a projected $350 million shortfall next year and is considering extending unpaid furlough days and layoffs.
(
Frank Stoltze/KPCC
)
Listen
0:55
Los Angeles moves to privatize city parking structures
Los Angeles moves to privatize city parking structures
The Los Angeles City Council Wednesday voted to move forward with a plan to privatize nine city parking structures. The unanimous vote came despite pleas from some business owners who fear the move will push up parking rates and drive away customers.
The city, facing its worst budget crisis ever, is hoping to haul in $53 million from the parking deal. L.A. faces an immediate $62 million shortfall.
Under the plan, the city would sign a 50-year deal with a private operator who would pay a one-time sum to the city – plus a share of annual revenues.
Wendy Shane, who owns a jewelry store near a city-owned parking structure in Westwood Village, denounced the move. She worried a private operator would raise rates at the facility and drive customers away from an area already hard hit by the recession.
“I can guarantee you there will be more businesses closing,” Shane said.
Councilman Paul Koretz, who represents the area, sounded sympathetic.
“The fact is we are competing with Santa Monica, which is now hugely successful, and Beverly Hills and Culver City.”
Sponsored message
But Koretz said he may go along with a deal if the city found a way to ease the pain for businesses. City administrators warned that placing too many restrictions on a private operator would reduce revenue to the city.
A proposal is expected to go out to bidders later this month. A deal could be signed in March.
The city’s financial outlook is dire. It faces a projected $350 million deficit for the fiscal year that starts July 1.
Bond rating agencies are closely watching how the city proceeds. So are the city's powerful labor unions.
City workers packed City Hall pleading with the Council to avoid extending unpaid furlough days and more layoffs.
Councilman Grieg Smith said the city must protect police and fire services as tax revenues remain flat and health care and pension costs soar.
“We have to lay off people to get there. If you want to protect public services, we have to take the pain.”
Sponsored message
Councilman Koretz, a staunch ally of the city’s labor unions, conceded that the council needs to take drastic action in next year’s budget.
“We’re looking at layoffs probably anyway. We’re looking at furloughs probably anyway,” he said.
“It’s just a matter of how much we devastate things.”
The city already has eliminated more than 4,000 positions; 400 people have lost their jobs.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
