With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
Los Angeles moves to privatize city parking structures
Los Angeles city workers pack City Hall. They asked the City Council to avoid extending unpaid furlough days and layoffs. The city faces a current $62 million shortfall, and a projected $350 million deficit for the fiscal year that starts July 1.
(
Frank Stoltze/KPCC
)
L.A. city firefighters were among those who attended a City Council meeting. L.A. faces a projected $350 million shortfall next year and is considering extending unpaid furlough days and layoffs.
(
Frank Stoltze/KPCC
)
Listen
0:55
Los Angeles moves to privatize city parking structures
Los Angeles moves to privatize city parking structures
The Los Angeles City Council Wednesday voted to move forward with a plan to privatize nine city parking structures. The unanimous vote came despite pleas from some business owners who fear the move will push up parking rates and drive away customers.
The city, facing its worst budget crisis ever, is hoping to haul in $53 million from the parking deal. L.A. faces an immediate $62 million shortfall.
Under the plan, the city would sign a 50-year deal with a private operator who would pay a one-time sum to the city – plus a share of annual revenues.
Wendy Shane, who owns a jewelry store near a city-owned parking structure in Westwood Village, denounced the move. She worried a private operator would raise rates at the facility and drive customers away from an area already hard hit by the recession.
Sponsored message
“I can guarantee you there will be more businesses closing,” Shane said.
Councilman Paul Koretz, who represents the area, sounded sympathetic.
“The fact is we are competing with Santa Monica, which is now hugely successful, and Beverly Hills and Culver City.”
But Koretz said he may go along with a deal if the city found a way to ease the pain for businesses. City administrators warned that placing too many restrictions on a private operator would reduce revenue to the city.
A proposal is expected to go out to bidders later this month. A deal could be signed in March.
The city’s financial outlook is dire. It faces a projected $350 million deficit for the fiscal year that starts July 1.
Bond rating agencies are closely watching how the city proceeds. So are the city's powerful labor unions.
Sponsored message
City workers packed City Hall pleading with the Council to avoid extending unpaid furlough days and more layoffs.
Councilman Grieg Smith said the city must protect police and fire services as tax revenues remain flat and health care and pension costs soar.
“We have to lay off people to get there. If you want to protect public services, we have to take the pain.”
Councilman Koretz, a staunch ally of the city’s labor unions, conceded that the council needs to take drastic action in next year’s budget.
“We’re looking at layoffs probably anyway. We’re looking at furloughs probably anyway,” he said.
“It’s just a matter of how much we devastate things.”
The city already has eliminated more than 4,000 positions; 400 people have lost their jobs.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
