This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.
This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.
LA housing panel hammers out final rules for seismic retrofitting law
LA's Housing Committee voted unanimously to split the cost of reinforcing rent-controlled homes against earthquakes between tenants and landlords.
(
Sanden Totten/KPCC
)
Los Angeles councilmembers voted Monday to split the cost of earthquake retrofits evenly between landlords and tenants in rent-controlled units, capping off a year of vigorous debate between the two groups.
The new policy attempts to close the loop on one of the most controversial aspects of the city's brand-new law requiring seismic retrofits: how to pay for repairs that cost potentially tens of thousands of dollars per building.
Under the new policy, tenants would see rent increases spread out over a 10 year-period. Monthly rent hikes would be capped at $38. The policy would apply to more than 170,000 housing units covered by the city's rent-stabilization law.
The 3-o vote by the Housing Committee comes nearly two months after the city approved its seismic retrofit mandate. The 50-50 payment plan still needs to be rubber-stamped by the full council in the coming days.
"Our primary goal is to make sure that everybody has a place in the city that they can live and work that is safe," said Councilmember Gil Cedillo, who chairs the housing panel.
Under current law, landlords have the right to pass through 100 percent of retrofit costs to renters, though increases would be restricted to $75/month. In San Francisco, landlords can pass on all the costs to tenants. But Cedillo had stated earlier this year that wasn't the plan in Los Angeles, where the gap between housing costs and renters' pay is among the widest in the country.
Renters' rights groups such as the Coalition for Economic Survival had objected to any rent increases related to seismic retrofits, but its executive director Larry Gross conceded that a 50 percent pass-through was still better than 100 percent.
Sponsored message
"It is a victory in the sense that we've been able to lower the cost that is now shared," Gross said.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
