This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.
This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.
Los Angeles City Council delays vote on police, fire health care plans
Los Angeles City Council Building
(
Chris Hall/Flickr (Creative Commons-licensed)
)
Listen
1:00
Los Angeles City Council delays vote on police, fire health care plans
Los Angeles City Council delays vote on police, fire health care plans
Labor union leaders representing Los Angeles city firefighters and police officers Tuesday beat back an attempt to cut back their health care benefits.
With health care costs soaring, L.A.’s City Administrative Officer Miguel Santana said firefighters and police officers have a choice – contribute more toward their retirement health care plans or see benefits shrink.
Under a plan presented by Santana, the city would freeze its contribution to retiree health care plans if the police and firefighters unions don't increase contributions.
Firefighters union chief Pat McOsker was angry the city council would even consider Santana's proposal.
“This motion before you is really to strangle health care for firefighters, cops," McOsker said. "I would say to you that’s no way to treat us."
"Give us a chance to sit down and negotiate with you," he added.
The head of the Los Angeles Police Protective League Paul Weber echoed McOsker.
Sponsored message
Firefighter and police union leaders are now negotiating their contracts. The Coalition of L.A. City Unions, which represents most civilian city employees, already has agreed to increase contributions to their retiree health care plans from 0 to 4 percent. Police officers and firefighters recently started paying 2 percent.
City Council President Eric Garcetti reminded police and firefighter union leaders that L.A. faces a nearly $400 million budget deficit, and warned of possible unpaid furloughs if they don't make concessions.
"At the end of the day, we have to balance the budget – somehow," Garcetti said.
But in the end, Garcetti voted with the majority in delaying a vote on whether to start the process of reducing retiree health care benefits. The vote was 11-3.
Councilman Bernard Parks, one of the dissenters, was overheard saying about his colleagues, “They have no guts. They don’t even pretend to have guts.”
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
