Protect local news!

Be one of 5,000 supporters to make a monthly gift during our fall member drive and help strengthen our nonprofit newsroom.
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Health official assures public that lead poisoning risk is low

exploring the neighborhood 4/22
Children in four Southern California zip codes had elevated levels of lead.
(
Chloe Wright/flickr Creative Commons
)

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

A Los Angeles public health official is downplaying the risk of lead poisoning faced by local children.

"Public Health [Department] wants to assure families that in Los Angeles County there's a lot fewer areas that were high risk," said Maurice Pantoja, an Environmental Health Manager with the L.A. County Department of Public Health.

His comments came in response to an investigation by the Reuters news agency.  

Using data from 2012, Reuters reported that children in four Southern California ZIP codes had elevated levels of lead. A sampling of children who had been blood-tested for lead surpassed the 5 percent threshold that is cause for concern. 
 
The ZIP codes were 90037, 90011, 90015 — three adjacent areas from South Los Angeles to southern portions of Downtown and Westlake. Rosemead's 91770 also reached levels above 5 percent. 

The county average was roughly 2 percent, in line with the state average.

Pantoja also noted that "there is no established safe level of blood lead exposure," and that the "primary determinants for action" by public health officials are elevated levels of lead in soil and peeling lead paint.

"Public Health doesn’t wait for blood lead levels to rise," he said, adding that the agency "acts on the basis of potential exposure."

The Reuters report showed that in some areas of the state, like Fresno, 10 percent of children tested had elevated levels of lead.
 
Officials said that families who live in homes built before 1978 should talk to their doctors about getting their children tested for lead exposure. Paint was lead-based until 1978.

Sponsored message

This story has been updated.

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today