Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Governor vetoes bill that would have required police to get warrant to use drones

Deputy Troy Sella from the new technology department of the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department (LASD) launches the SkySeer Unmanned Arial Vehicle (UAV) drone, 16 June 2006 at a demonstration flight in Redlands, California. The LASD plans to purchase SkySeer drones to carry out surveillance and rescue operations. It will be the first time UAVs, long used by the military in war zones, will be used by law enforcement.
Deputy Troy Sella from the new technology department of the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department (LASD) launches the SkySeer Unmanned Arial Vehicle (UAV) drone, 16 June 2006 at a demonstration flight in Redlands, California.
(
ROBYN BECK/AFP/Getty Images
)

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

Governor Jerry Brown vetoed a bill this weekend that would have required law enforcement agencies in California to get a warrant to use drones for surveillance assignments.

Assembly Bill 1327, introduced by Assembly Member Jeff Gorell (R – Camarillo), would have limited how police and other public agencies could use drones including how long they could keep data collected by drones. It also would have prohibited law enforcement from adding weapons on the drones unless allowed by federal law.

There were exceptions in the bill for public safety emergencies such as a hostage crisis, fires, or hot pursuits – situations when people or first responders would be in danger. 

In his written veto message, Governor Brown said there were instances where a warrant is appropriate but said the proposal in front of him was too restrictive.

“The bill’s exceptions however, appear to be too narrow and could impose requirements beyond what is required by either the 4th Amendment or the privacy provisions of the California Constitution,” Brown said.

Gorell called the veto decision disappointing in a released statement. The bill, he said, provided common sense protections to protect privacy right and civil liberties. He underlined that the proposal was the only drone privacy protection bill that was passed by the Legislature and sent to the Governor’s Desk.

“We live in an era of government surveillance, where powerful government agencies like the NSA and IRS have demonstrated blatant disregard for Americans’ privacy rights,” Gorell said in a statement.

Sponsored message

The California Police Chiefs Association, the California State Sheriff’s Association and the Los Angeles District Attorneys Association opposed the bill.

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, the L.A. Times and the San Jose Mercury News supported the bill – both cities have police departments that have acquired drones, or unmanned aerial vehicles, as they are technically called.

This month, the president of the L.A. Police Commission asked the LAPD inspector general to take custody of two drones the police department received in March from the Seattle Police Department.

The so-called mini-choppers will stay locked up, said police commission officials, until guidelines for how the LAPD will use them are set. The department intends to present a drone draft policy to the civilian police oversight commission in about six months.

Most recently, the FAA has given a handful of movie companies approval to use drones for television and film production.

The FAA is required to integrate drones into national airspace by September 2015, according to the 2012 reauthorization bill. That same bill directed the FAA to allow public safety agencies to operate small drones that weigh no more than 4.4 lbs. The machines must be flown during the day, in the line of sight of the person controlling it and fly no higher than 400 feet above the ground. Law enforcement agencies who want to use these small drones have to apply for a permit with the FAA.

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today