Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Still no sentence in Old Fire arson murder trial

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 0:36
Still no sentence in Old Fire arson murder trial

Last month, a jury in San Bernardino deliberated quickly before convicting Rickie Lee Fowler of arson and murder for touching off the deadly 90,000-acre Old Fire in 2003.

But after two weeks of talking about what sentence he deserves, the same jury still hasn't decided whether the San Bernardino man should get life in prison or the death penalty.

Part of the delay could be the difficulty of deciding whether Fowler, 31, deserves capital punishment when the five deaths in the Old Fire weren't the result of burn injuries.

Five men died of stress-related heart attacks as the Old Fire ravaged the San Bernardino Mountains. It burned from the northern border of San Bernardino to the mountaintop resort town of Lake Arrowhead. The flames destroyed more than 1,000 homes and other structures over nine days.

During the trial, a medical examiner with the San Bernardino County Coroner's office testified that he believed the Old Fire triggered the five fatal heart attacks. But defense attorneys argued that the victims, whose ages ranged from 54 to 93, had pre-existing health conditions including heart disease, high blood pressure, obesity and emphysema which put them at high risk for sudden death.

They also argued that Fowler did not intend to kill anyone.

But San Bernardino County prosecutors said Fowler intentionally set the fire, possibly in retaliation over a dispute with another man. They argued that felony arson makes the five deaths murder, which makes him eligible for the death penalty.

Sponsored message

Deliberations in the penalty phase of Fowler's trial have been slowed by schedule conflicts, reviews of court transcripts and juror questions for the judge and the attorneys. That communication is sealed.

Court records show that on Tuesday, jurors convened around 9:30 in the morning. A half-hour later, they took a 20-minute break. They broke for lunch at 11:30 a.m., returned in the afternoon to talk for about 90 minutes, and then went home for the day.

If the jury deadlocks on a sentence recommendation and the judge declares a mistrial in the penalty phase, the murder conviction will stick. But prosecutors would have the option of retrying Fowler in the penalty phase, and with twelve new jurors in the jury box.

Deliberations resume Tuesday.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right