Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Ex-Sheriff Baca's prison sentence draws reactions of sadness, frustration

Former Los Angeles County Sheriff Lee Baca leaves federal court in Los Angeles after his corruption trial went to the jury on March 13, 2017, in Los Angeles.
Attorneys and a victim of jail violence express different views about the three-year prison sentence for former Los Angeles County Sheriff Lee Baca, who was convicted of obstruction of justice in the county jail abuse scandal.
(
Nick Ut/AP
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

When Peter Eliasberg heard the news Friday that a federal judge sentenced former Los Angeles County Sheriff Lee Baca to three years in prison for his role in the jail inmate abuse scandal, the civil rights attorney who fought long and hard to oust Baca hardly celebrated.

“It’s a very sad day,” said Eliasberg, chief counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California and co-author of a 2011 report that helped shed light on how sheriff’s deputies were beating up inmates inside the jails.

Eliasberg called Baca's sentencing “a kind of capstone on a really ugly page in Los Angeles County history.”

The ACLU report included 69 declarations, most of them from inmates who had either experienced or witnessed beatings inside Men’s Central Jail in downtown L.A. It included statements from two jail chaplains appalled at the violence they were seeing.

At the time, Baca dismissed the allegations. He said the inmates were lying and that visitors to the jail would find a “hospital-like environment.”

For too long, people accepted that explanation from the sheriff, Eliasberg said, “including members of the Board of Supervisors.”

Earlier this year, a jury convicted Baca, 74, of obstruction of justice for trying to block a federal investigation into the abuses – the tenth and highest ranking sheriff’s official to be convicted in the scheme. Baca was also convicted of conspiracy and lying to federal investigators. The scandal forced his resignation in 2014.

Sponsored message

Baca's prison term sends a message that nobody is above the law, Eliasberg said.

For Michael Holguin, three years behind bars isn't long enough for Baca. Holguin, 37, ended up in a wheelchair for six months in 2008 after deputies attacked him for what they perceived as disrespect. They broke his left tibia and left him needing eight stitches in his skull.

“He [Baca] wanted to blame everyone else for what was going on but he was the top guy,” Holguin said. “He should have been held to a higher standard.”

Paul Tanaka, Baca’s undersheriff and the man who oversaw the day-to-day effort to block the FBI investigation, was sentenced last year to five years in prison.

Ron Kaye, a civil rights attorney who has represented inmates, knows well the abuses that occurred behind jail walls at the sheriff’s department. 

“I’ve had clients who’ve had their orbital eye sockets broken, their legs broken,” Kaye said. “They will never be whole again.”

But Kaye believes Baca, who is suffering from third stage Alzheimer’s disease, should have been spared prison time.

Sponsored message

“My feeling is he has a limited amount of time on earth in which he will be able to be coherent, to be able to enjoy the people he loves,” said Kaye, echoing the plea from Baca's defense attorney Nathan Hochman. “I think there should have been some compassion toward that.”

Even the federal prosecutors who argued the case against Baca recommended he spend only two years in prison, not three.

Judge Percy Anderson said he considered Baca’s Alzheimer’s as well as some of the good he did as sheriff, and reduced the sentence from the federal guidelines of 41 to 51 months.

But Anderson, who rejected a deal between prosecutors and Baca that called for not more than six months in prison, said the former sheriff needed to spend more time behind bars because of the seriousness of his crime.

Kaye expressed frustration at that idea. He argued Baca already has “suffered tremendously” from his prosecution and that prison time would serve no deterrent effect.

“Other law enforcement leaders now know the federal government will prosecute you if you violate civil rights,” Kaye said. “To be ‘tough on crime’ just for the principle itself makes no sense.”

It’s unclear how many inmates were beaten during the worst years of the jail violence, from 2008 to 2012, Eliasberg said.

Sponsored message

“We will never know because many inmates never came forward because they feared retaliation by deputies,” he said. “It was not a handful,” Eliasberg said. 

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right