Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Legal experts: Case against high-ranking LA jail officials could be 'slugfest'

Former Los Angeles County Undersheriff Paul Tanaka is among the candidates who spoke at a sheriff's debate at the Van Nuys Civic Center in Van Nuys on Wednesday, March 12, 2014.
Former Los Angeles County Undersheriff Paul Tanaka was indicted on federal conspiracy charges.
(
Stuart Palley/ KPCC
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 0:59
Legal experts: Case against high-ranking LA jail officials could be 'slugfest'

Months after seven lower-ranking deputies were convicted of obstructing an FBI investigation into abuse in Los Angeles Jails, the U.S. Attorneys Office in Los Angeles Thursday announced long-awaited charges against top tier officials in the L.A. County Sheriff's Department. Legal experts said it'll be a tough case.

A grand jury indictment unsealed Thursday shows the evidence against former Undersheriff Paul Tanaka and Captain Tom Carey so far is based primarily on testimony of the convicted deputies, corroborated by an email and some phone records, according to Joe Akrotirianakis, a former federal prosecutor who worked in the public corruption unit in L.A. and is now in private practice.

"That is a difficult case for a prosecutor to prove," he said. "Because these people are going to be made to look like they have a real incentive to tell the truth the way the government wants to hear it."

The seven deputies were found guilty by a jury last year of participating in a conspiracy to thwart the federal investigation. They face 21 to 41 months in prison. Tanaka and Carey were both called to testify in their trials.

Akrotirianakis said the delay in charging higher ups is often strategic.

"It's federal prosecutor 101," he said. "Prosecute a lower level person, they don't want to cooperate. Once they're convicted, what are their options? Seek leniency by cooperating against someone else."

Laurie Levenson, a former federal prosecutor and current Loyola Law professor, said the pure quantity of witnesses saying the same thing might win over a jury.

Sponsored message

"There's safety in numbers," Levenson said. "There's enough corroboration among them and among their communications."

Tanaka's attorney, H. Dean Steward, has a strong track record in federal court, Akrotirianakis said. And so do the prosecutors on the case, Assistant U.S. Attorneys Brandon Fox, Elizabeth Rhodes, and Margaret Carter. Carey is represented by former U.S. Atty Tom O'Brien.

"It could be a real slugfest," Akrotirianakis said. 

The next question will be how high up the chain the alleged conspiracy went and whether prosecutors will build a case against former Sheriff Lee Baca, who retired last year under a cloud after the initial indictments.

Akrotirianakis said the U.S. Attorney's Office has shown a willingness to be bold with its indictments against these higher ranking officials. Baca, he said, might be next.

"It wouldn't surprise me if that's the way this goes," he said.

But the public documents so far don't indicate what kind of evidence - if any - would point to his involvement.

Sponsored message

"They would need conversations, preferably taped, they would need emails, they would need lies and coverups by Baca," Levenson said. "And they would need some credible witnesses pointing their finger at Baca."

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right