Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Anaheim to consider tightening rules on lobbyists

Anaheim's city council meets Tuesday to give its final blessing to a map that splits the city into six neighborhood districts and a new plan that requires council candidates to live and be voted into office by the people who live in that district.
File photo, Anaheim City Hall. Anaheim's city council meets Tuesday to vote on several proposals that would require lobbyists to register with the city and establish a revolving door policy that would restrict lobbying by former city officials.
(
Damian Dovarganes/AP
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Anaheim City Council is expected to vote on new restrictions on lobbyists and expanding access to public records about lobbying at its Tuesday night meeting. The so-called Sunshine Ordinance proposed by freshman Councilman Jose Moreno is aimed at increasing transparency in city government. 

Under the proposed rules, lobbyists would be required to register with the city and file quarterly reports on lobbying activities.

The ordinance would also prohibit Anaheim from hiring people who have second jobs with lobbying firms, which could affect several aides currently working for city council members. 

It would also establish a revolving door policy prohibiting former city employees from returning to lobby the city for two years. In addition, it would require the city to retain emails to and from top city officials on city servers for 90 days. 

Moreno said Anaheim had a long history of cozy relationships between city officials and companies — especially in the resort district, which includes Disneyland and several major hotel chains — that do business in Anaheim. 

“In Anaheim, the culture is, well of course, a lobbying firm can have one of their employees working in the city," Moreno said. "Of course, a former director or senior person in the city can work for a lobbying firm and then go and lobby you or go and run the contract that they set up.” 

City Council already passed Moreno’s Sunshine Ordinance 5 to 2 on a first read. The council will take a final vote Tuesday. 

Sponsored message

The council will also consider an alternative ordinance proposed by Councilwoman Kris Murray. 

Murray, who voted against Moreno’s proposal two weeks ago, said she wanted even stronger restrictions on lobbyists and a more expansive revolving door policy. 

Under her proposal, paid workers on city council election campaigns would not be allowed to take jobs with the city if their candidate was victorious. And retired city officials would be prohibited from lobbying the city for a length of time equal to their time in office.

Her proposal would also require council members to recuse themselves from voting on an issue if any family members, including cousins and in-laws, have a vested interest in the outcome. 

“If we’re going to make a change, let’s set the bar,” she said.

The dueling Sunshine Ordinance proposals could lead to yet another showdown on Anaheim's contentious city council dais, which pits a pro-Disney minority against Moreno, Mayor Tom Tait and other members who have pledged to curb the influence of big business on local decision-making. 

Moreno said Murray’s proposal was an attempt to stymie his efforts. 

Sponsored message

“Councilwoman Murray has had 6 1/2 years to propose strong ethical policies and guidelines and strong ordinances around lobbying activities,” Moreno said. “It raises the question ‘why now?'"

OC watchdog Shirley Grindle said she had read through both proposals and supported Moreno’s, generally, though she wanted to see some of Murray’s language included in the final ordinance. 

The city council meeting starts at 5 p.m.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right