Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Advocate: Customers should stop paying San Onofre costs immediately

Southern California Edison said Friday it would create an advisory panel as part of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station decommissioning process. The company also said it intends to send its decommissioning plans to federal regulators by next summer.
Even though Southern California Edison (SCE) decided to shut down the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) earlier this month, customers are still footing the bill for the plant.
(
Mae Ryan/KPCC
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 0:52
Advocate: Customers should stop paying San Onofre costs immediately

Even though Southern California Edison (SCE) decided to shut down the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) earlier this month, customers are still footing the bill for the plant. 

Since last year, the California Public Utilities Commission has been investigating whether ratepayers should be let off the hook for San Onofre.

The investigation has been painstakingly slow. It’s not expected to be complete for several more years.

But the Division of Ratepayer Advocates, the independent consumer advocate within the Public Utilities Commission, wants to speed up the process.

It filed a motion urging the commission to stop letting Edison and San Diego Gas and Electric charge customers for San Onofre costs, except those related to essential safety and security.

“Charging ratepayers expenses for a non-operational plant is so clearly unreasonable that failure to remove  SONGS costs from rates immediately would be a violation of Section 451," the motion argues. Section 451 mandates all utility charges are just and reasonable. 

The motion also accuses Edison of double dipping, taking a write-down on a plant it's still earning money on.

Sponsored message

"Absent removal of the SONGS revenue requirement from customer rates, SCE will be taking a pretax impairment charge for a facility that has ceased power operation but continues to generate a full rate of return on its investment through its customer rates," the motion says.

In an e-mail, Edison spokeswoman Maureen Brown called the Division's action premature and said its claims are unfounded.

"SCE acted reasonably and looks forward to demonstrating this fact in the evidentiary hearings," said Brown " In the meantime, the CPUC has set rates beginning in January 2012 as 'subject to refund,' so no party is disadvantaged by permitting the commission's reviews to run their course." 

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today