One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.
LA delays decision on plan to stop homeless encampment sweeps during emergencies
Elected leaders in Los Angeles have decided that more deliberation is needed before they agree to a plan that would pause the city’s homeless encampment sweeps during environmental disasters.
The L.A. City Council was scheduled to take up a proposal Wednesday that would have directed the city’s Sanitation Bureau to suspend encampment sweeps in neighborhoods affected by environmental emergencies declared by city or state officials.
But at the start of the meeting, Councilmember Ysabel Jurado introduced an amendment to the proposal. Instead of ordering the bureau to make the change, her new language instructed the bureau to “report back on options” for suspending sweeps during emergencies.
All 15 councilmembers voted to approve that amended proposal, which sets no due date for the bureau’s report.
How the proposal came about
Jurado represents Boyle Heights, the neighborhood that was recently choked with noxious smoke and rotting food odor as a result of the Lineage cold storage warehouse fire. She introduced the proposal to suspend encampments sweeps during emergencies shortly after that fire broke out in June.
In her original motion, Jurado wrote that the city’s regular encampment sweeps “serve important sanitation and public health purposes,” but can harm unhoused people who are trying to take whatever refuge they can from nearby hazards.
“During periods of extreme heat, poor air quality, smoke, hazardous debris or other environmental emergencies, requiring unsheltered residents to remain outdoors while relocating their belongings may increase their exposure to dangerous conditions,” Jurado wrote.
The City Council could still implement this change after receiving the report they’ve now requested from the Sanitation Bureau, though the timing remains unclear.
If the changes are implemented, they could affect thousands of people across the city. According to the region’s latest homeless count, the city of L.A. has more than 45,000 people experiencing homelessness on any given night. About 60% of them are unsheltered.
Sweeps can harm physical and mental health
The city’s encampment sweeps typically require unhoused people to dismantle their tents or makeshift shelters, pack up their belongings and relocate so that sanitation crews can clean sidewalks and other public areas.
Service providers have said sweeps can cause them to lose touch with the unhoused people they’re trying to help. Public health researchers have found that sweeps, which happen at least monthly for about a third of L.A.’s unhoused residents, can worsen unhoused people’s physical and mental health.
A study published earlier this year found that sweeps in L.A. County were associated with poorer physical health and worse psychological distress, as reported by hundreds of surveyed unhoused Angelenos.
Randall Kuhn, a professor of community health sciences at UCLA who co-authored the study, said the city should ideally give unhoused people a chance to enter safe indoor shelters during emergencies. Barring that, he said, the city should at least allow people to stay put.
“The idea that you now want to kick them out of that spot where they've managed to stay safe, to stay alive, and tell them that they now need to start walking around, carrying all their stuff in 108-degree weather, it's not only harmful and unethical, but it's inviting legal action,” Kuhn said.
As originally written, Jurado’s proposal would have instructed the Sanitation Bureau to post notices in areas affected by officially declared emergencies, letting unhoused people know that scheduled cleanups would not happen.
Officials would also have been required to notify residents about suspended sweeps through postings at cooling centers and shelters, on social media and through other public channels.