Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
Health

Local Experts Diverge Over CDC’s Shortened Isolation Recommendation

A woman wearing a hat, sunglasses and a mask stands behind people at a distance.
A woman wears a protective mask on March 19, 2020, in Oakland, California.
(
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
/
Getty Images North America
)

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

There's a lot of debate over the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention changing its recommended COVID-19 isolation period.

The update calls for people to isolate for five days instead of 10. It also directs them to wear a mask around others for an extra five days.

That’s for people who test positive but have no symptoms after five days of isolation. While the CDC's director, Dr. Rochelle Walensky, says the update ensures “people can safely continue their daily lives,” local experts are divided on the directive.

UCLA infectious disease expert Dr. Robert Kim-Farley said isolating for five days will cover the period when many people are most infectious.

“Continuing to wear a mask for the next five days afterwards provides good public health protection, with a balance to what we need to do to keep our society functioning,” he said.

But Dr. Eric Topol, professor of molecular medicine at Scripps Research, argues there's no evidence to support cutting the isolation period. He worries it will result in more spread and is concerned the update doesn't acknowledge how people can clear the virus at different times.

“At least 10 days captured most people past when they would have infectious potential,” he said.

Sponsored message

Topol said people should at least be required to get tested after the five-day period before ending isolation.

The guidance does say an infected person who has symptoms after five days should continue to isolate.

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today