With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
Federal judge dismisses ex-Sheriff Villanueva's defamation lawsuit
Sheriff Alex Villanueva.
(
Screenshot from Sheriff's Department Facebook video
)
A lawsuit filed by former Sheriff Alex Villanueva against Los Angeles County has been dismissed by a federal judge.
The former sheriff had accused the county of smearing his name professionally by placing him on a “do not rehire” list. He was placed on the list after a county oversight panel found Villanueva had harassed and discriminated against two county employees while he was in office from 2018 to 2022.
U.S. District Judge Stephen Wilson dismissed the suit “with prejudice,” meaning it can't be brought back to the court.
The background
Villanueva was elected sheriff in 2018. He ran again in 2022, but lost to current Sheriff Robert Luna.
Support for LAist comes from
He was placed on the “do not rehire” list after the county oversight panel examined two cases of harassment or discrimination. In one, the panel said, he accused the county’s inspector general of being a Holocaust denier. In the other, he harassed a woman of color who was employed by a county supervisor, according to the panel.
The lawsuit
In May, Villanueva filed documents with the county signaling his intent to sue for $25 million. His lawsuit was filed in federal court in June.
In a letter sent to the Board of Supervisors, he claimed his career was “dealt a lethal blow” when county officials allegedly held secret, closed session meetings last fall without notifying him or allowing him to defend himself against the allegations.
Villanueava said in the letter that his reputation was damaged as a result of those meetings, and that he was blocked from ever being rehired by L.A. County again. He said he filed public records requests seeking information about the proceedings, but the responses were either untimely or incomplete.
The ruling
In documents requesting that the lawsuit be dismissed, the county argued that Villanueva and his attorneys had not pleaded their case properly and that he “vaguely” complained that his career with the county ended because he was placed on the “do not rehire” list.
Support for LAist comes from
The county argued in the documents that "the County did not end [Villanueva’s] career as Sheriff — the voters did.”
The county also argued that Villanueva failed to plead in court documents that he had been defamed.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
Kevin Lacy has an obsession with documenting California’s forgotten and decaying places. -
Restaurants share resources in the food hall in West Adams as Los Angeles reckons with increasing restaurant closures. -
It will be the second national day of protest against President Donald Trump. -
The university says the compact, as the Trump administration called it, could undermine free inquiry and academic excellence. -
This is the one time you can do this legally! -
Metro officials said it will be able to announce an opening date “soon.”
Best of LAist