Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
Criminal Justice

DA reduces charges in LAPD cop recording case, citing concerns over potential whistleblowers

A white man with short, dark brown hair stands at a lectern. He's wearing a blue suit, white shirt and blue diagonally striped tie.
Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman speaks at his swearing-in ceremony on the steps of the Hall of Justice in downtown L.A.
(
Frank Stoltze
/
LAist
)

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

Topline:

Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman said Wednesday he will reduce charges against LAPD Officer Daniel Flores from felonies to misdemeanors. Flores is accused of illegally recording his fellow officers as they made racist, sexist and anti-gay remarks.

What’s next? Hochman said he was reducing the 16 felony charges against Flores to 16 misdemeanor charges — one for each LAPD officer who’d been secretly recorded, which is illegal in California. Hochman also said state prison was off the table for Flores, who now has a pathway to request what’s known as judicial diversion for one year.

What’s judicial diversion? If the court grants Flores’ request for a diversion, the charges could eventually be dismissed after a one-year period in which he is required to obey all laws. “ That is what we anticipate will end up happening with the Daniel Flores case,” Hochman said.

Why the change? Hochman said he had heard feedback on the charges from community members and elected officials “ in many different quarters” regarding the potential chilling effect the case could have on future whistleblowers. Some of those included L.A. Mayor Karen Bass, Melina Abdullah of Black Lives Matter L.A. and City Councilmember Hugo Soto-Martinez. “The way we charged the case was not making the message clear,” Hochman said. “We believe that by reducing the felonies to misdemeanors, not dismissing the case … that was striking the appropriate balance between accountability, fairness, deterring illegal conduct and incentivizing whistleblowers.”

Privacy concerns: Hochman said sending a broader message on illegal eavesdropping and privacy concerns via secret phone recordings and smart glasses was part of his original intent in bringing the charges. California is an all-party consent state, meaning it's illegal to record private conversations without permission of everyone being taped.

The timeline: Hochman said the charges would be officially reduced the next time Flores appears in court, which “ might happen as early as tomorrow, or no later than by next week.”

Sponsored message

For more on the concerns over whistleblower chilling: Read Frank Stoltze’s coverage of the backlash to the charges.

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today