Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Climate politics and insurance intertwine, giving California official a no-win choice on State Farm
Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara, right, talks with homeowner Bruce Breslau following a legislative oversight hearing held by the state insurance commissioner at L.A. City Hall
(
Robert Gauthier
/
Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
)
Topline:
Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara is weighing an emergency 22% rate hike request by State Farm, the state’s largest insurer, following the Los Angeles fires. After first hitting pause on the request last month, he met with State Farm executives directly to get more information and said he’d decide what to do next by the end of this week.
Why it matters: Approving it would raise bills for millions of Californians, given that State Farm has 16% of the state’s homeowners’ insurance market. Not granting it risks plunging State Farm further into financial trouble, which could reduce insurance availability even more. It’s the clearest example yet of how worsening wildfire catastrophes have thrust the insurance commissioner job into the front lines of climate politics — with the pocketbooks of nearly every Californian at stake.
Why he would grant it: State Farm executives have said that the company is on such precarious financial footing that it could face a credit downgrade following the Los Angeles fires, which it expects to be the costliest disaster in its history at $7.6 billion in claims. A downgrade would mean that ratings agencies don’t believe State Farm can be relied on to pay out future claims — and could trigger banks to stop allowing State Farm insurance as collateral for mortgages, an unprecedented hit to State Farm’s California customers.
Support for LAist comes from
Why he wouldn’t grant it: The emergency rate hike won’t fix any of the underlying issues causing the insurance market to spiral. Advocacy group Consumer Watchdog has argued State Farm could do more to pull from the reserves of its parent company and reinsurer to prop up its finances — and has said it could go to court or demand a hearing to prove its point if Lara grants the interim request. State Farm told Lara last week that it would need an even higher rate increase than 22% before it would consider writing new policies in California again.
What else to keep in mind: State Farm is also concurrently negotiating a 30% rate hike request with the Insurance Department under new rules passed by Lara last year that allow it to raise rates using forward-looking models that take climate change into account. Lara’s staff has recommended granting the 22% interim rate hike while continuing negotiations over the bigger rate increase, which they said they weren’t convinced was warranted.
For more, read the full story in POLITICO’s California Climate newsletter.
This story is published in partnership with POLITICO.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline. -
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
Best of LAist