With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
California's climate laws get a skeptical second look — from Democrats

Topline:
From refinery regulations to fuel rules to landmark laws capping emissions and mandating environmental reviews, California is retrenching on climate policies — and in an unexpected twist, it’s Democrats leading the way as they look to allay spiraling costs.
State of play: Gov. Gavin Newsom and Democratic lawmakers — both in Sacramento and Congress — have made a series of moves to blunt or roll back various environmental laws. That follows a sobering 2024 election for Democrats, who lost ground with voters frustrated by an increasingly unaffordable state.
Why it matters: California has long been a national environmental leader and an important test case for the proposition that ambitious climate change laws can coexist with economic prosperity. That ideal is now under immense strain. Striking the right balance could be vital to Democrats’ fortunes and for the climate movement.
From Sacramento to Washington: The second Trump administration is casting a long shadow over California, as the White House and Republican allies in Congress work to reverse some of California’s signature climate programs. Sacramento has largely responded by vowing to hold the line. For instance, after Trump attacked California’s cap-and-trade system, Newsom vowed to extend it this year — although those negotiations have also fueled tensions as Newsom and environmentalists split on whether to fortify the program. But California Democrats have not uniformly opposed Trump’s policies. Two Congress members voted with Republicans to overturn Newsom’s ban on future gas-powered car sales, citing the financial toll on their constituents.
Read more in POLITICO’s California Climate newsletter.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress.
-
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.
-
Kevin Lacy has an obsession with documenting California’s forgotten and decaying places.
-
Restaurants share resources in the food hall in West Adams as Los Angeles reckons with increasing restaurant closures.
-
It will be the second national day of protest against President Donald Trump.
-
The university says the compact, as the Trump administration called it, could undermine free inquiry and academic excellence.