Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Ten of the 12 candidates for D.A. faced off
    Ten people sit in chairs on a stage.
    Ten of the 12 candidates for Los Angeles District Attorney debate on Thursday, Jan. 18, 2024 at Engine Co. 28 in downtown L.A.

    Topline:

    District Attorney George Gascón came under withering criticism during a debate in downtown Los Angeles Thursday night that featured 10 of the 12 candidates vying to be the county’s top prosecutor.

    The backstory: Gascón instituted a sweeping set of reforms after he was elected in 2020. Many of them focused on reducing penalties for people convicted of crimes. He said it was an effort to reduce mass incarceration and racial disparities in the criminal justice system.

    The criticism: His opponents argued that the incumbent’s reforms had made Angelenos less safe. One — Nathan Hochman, a criminal defense attorney and a former Republican candidate for California attorney general — said the changes had heralded “golden age of criminals,” because they were spending less time behind bars.

    The crime numbers: Gallup’s annual crime poll found 77% of Americans believe there is more crime in the U.S. than a year ago. But crime is trending downward, according to criminologist Jeff Asher. FBI third quarter national data last year found violent crime fell 8% while property crime fell 6.3% in 2023 compared to 2022, according to Asher. Los Angeles Police Department  data shows violent crime is down 10.8% and property crime is down 18% year to date from two years ago.

    District Attorney George Gascón came under withering criticism during a debate in downtown Los Angeles Thursday night that featured 10 of the 12 candidates vying to be the county’s top prosecutor.

    Gascón instituted a sweeping set of reforms after he was elected in 2020. Many of them focused on reducing penalties for people convicted of crimes. He said it was an effort to reduce mass incarceration and racial disparities in the criminal justice system.

    “What I will continue to do if I were to be honored with being reelected is continue (with a policy) that cares for the victims of our community and does so in a thoughtful and intelligent way,” Gascón said at the debate.

    But his opponents argued that the incumbent’s reforms had made Angelenos less safe. One — Nathan Hochman, a criminal defense attorney and a former Republican candidate for California attorney general — said the changes had heralded a “golden age of criminals,” because they were spending less time behind bars.

    Other candidates agreed.

    “The social experiment that Mr. Gascón has been engaging with is not working,” said Eric Siddall, a deputy district attorney and one of four of Gascón’s own prosecutors running to unseat him. Siddall said serious offenders are being treated too leniently.

    Superior Court Judge Debra Archuleta, a former prosecutor, said Gascón’s policies have eroded public safety.

    “The question, ladies and gentlemen, is: Are we safer than we were three years ago? Unequivocally we are not,” she said.

    Fears about safety are up, violent crime is down

    According to a Gallup poll released in November, fear for personal safety is at a three-decade high around the country. The poll found 40% of Americans said they would be afraid to walk alone at night within a mile of their home. Gallup has been asking that question since 1963.

    Gallup’s annual crime poll also found 77% of Americans believe there is more crime in the U.S. than a year ago.

    “We have a society right now in Los Angeles who feels really unsafe,” said Jon Hatami, one of Gascón’s deputy district attorneys. He promised to prosecute people “to the fullest extent of the law.”

    But crime is trending downward, according to criminologist Jeff Asher. FBI third-quarter national data last year found violent crime fell 8% while property crime fell 6.3% in 2023 compared to 2022, according to Asher. Violent crime nationally has trended downward for at least 30 years according to FBI data.

    Los Angeles Police Department data show violent crime is down 10.8% and property crime is down 18% year to date from two years ago.

    At the debate, Gascón pointed to this as evidence his policies work.

    “We have seen crime coming down not only in our community but we’re seeing crime going down nationwide, at the same time we have continued with the reform effort,” said Gascón, a former LAPD assistant chief who was also district attorney in San Francisco.

    Challengers said his more lenient approach to crime has created an atmosphere of impunity in L.A. County as evidenced in part by “smash and grab” robberies by groups of people caught on videotape. There have also been several high-profile cases where people who committed serious crimes received relatively light sentences.

    “We have to restore the public’s trust that we are doing the job that we have to do to keep them safe,” said Deputy District Attorney Maria Ramirez. She called Gascón’s policies “pro-criminal.”

    Gascón said his office is prosecuting violent crimes, including violent misdemeanors, “at the same rate” as previous district attorneys.

    “We are dealing with organized retail theft, we are dealing with fentanyl,” he said. “The reality is that all of that work is being done and will continue to be done if I were to be reelected.”

    Prosecuting misdemeanors

    One of Gascón’s policies is aimed at misdemeanor crimes. His office declines to file charges involving 13 categories of low-level misdemeanors, including driving on a suspended license, drug and paraphernalia possession, and public intoxication. The policy calls for misdemeanor charges only when there are extenuating circumstances, like repeat offenses.

    Gascón has said many people accused of misdemeanors are unhoused, drug-addicted and/or mentally ill, and that prosecuting them is unfair and has minimal effect on public safety.

    Craig Mitchell, a Superior Court judge and former prosecutor and high school teacher, said he would prosecute misdemeanors. “Police are turning a blind eye to so many crimes because they know nothing is going to happen even if they bring the case to the district attorney,” he said.

    “We need to figure out how to get people who are engaged in low-level crimes into the criminal justice system so that those who are crying out for mental health treatment, for addiction treatment, can actually be encouraged to obtain such treatment,” he said.

    Many of the other candidates echoed a similar sentiment, saying the D.A.’s office should use the prosecutions of unhoused people who commit crimes to steer them into social services in exchange for dropping criminal charges.

    Almost all of the candidates said they would generally seek tougher penalties than Gascon.

    “I will repeal any vestige and replace any vestige of the original directives issued by George Gascón,” said John McKinney, a deputy district attorney. “Much of what he imposed upon us … were a set of one-size-fits-all blanket policies.”

    Leadership in the district attorney's office

    The policies have outraged many in the district attorney's office, where individual prosecutors have far less discretion and morale is said to be at an all-time low.

    “The office is in crisis,” said Siddall, who presented himself as part of “a new generation of prosecutors” who neither embraces Gascón’s more liberal policies nor wants to “to turn back the clock” to policies that fuel mass incarceration. He said he would focus his attention on the small percentage of people who commit violent crimes, if elected.

    Some candidates at the debate argued they would be tougher on crime than the rest.

    “I’m law and order. I’m conservative,” said retired Superior Court Judge David Milton, the only registered Republican running in the non-partisan race. Milton said Gascon is part of a national movement of liberal prosecutors.

    “Their aim is to destroy our constitutional democratic republic,” he said. “Gascon is moving in the direction of socialism and communism.”

    Former federal prosecutor Jeff Chemerinsky focused less on Gascón and instead promised to increase cooperation between the district attorney’s office and local law enforcement.

    “I’d collaborate with law enforcement and restore the sense of partnership that I think right now is lacking,” Chemerinsky said.

    He was the only challenger to agree with Gascón that Proposition 47 need not be amended. The 2014 voter-approved measure reduced six crimes from felonies to misdemeanors, including simple drug possession petty theft under $950.

    Gascón was a co-author of the measure.

    Two candidates — criminal defense attorney Dan Kapelovitz and San Bernardino Deputy District Attorney Lloyd Bobcat Masson — did not attend the debate. Kapelovitz said he was not invited. The sponsor, LA Magazine, did not provide a reason why.

  • Focus on wife's health benefits
    A light-skinned Black man with glasses, a short-cropped salt-and-pepper beard, and short-cropped salt-and-pepper hair, smiles at the camera.
    A preliminary hearing on corruptions charges facing Curren Price began Tuesday.

    Topline:

    A court hearing for Los Angeles City Councilmember Curren Price got underway Tuesday, with a focus on allegations Price was married to another woman when he collected city health insurance benefits for his wife — which prosecutors say amounted to embezzlement of city funds.

    Backstory: In addition to facing five counts of grand theft by embezzlement of public funds, Price faces four counts of conflict of interest related to votes he took on projects connected to his wife’s business and three counts of perjury by declaration related to allegations he failed to disclose financial interests related to his wife’s business.

    The details: Price has pleaded not guilty in Los Angeles County Superior Court. At the end of the preliminary hearing, which is expected to run several days, a judge will be asked to determine whether there’s enough evidence for the case to go to trial. If convicted on all charges, he faces up to 11 years behind bars.

    What's next: Ex-employees of both Price and his wife are expected to testify.

    A court hearing for Los Angeles City Councilmember Curren Price got underway Tuesday, with a focus on allegations Price was married to another woman when he collected city health insurance benefits for his wife — which prosecutors say amounted to embezzlement of city funds.

    In addition to facing five counts of grand theft by embezzlement of public funds, Price faces four counts of conflict of interest related to votes he took on projects connected to his wife’s business and three counts of perjury by declaration related to allegations he failed to disclose financial interests related to his wife’s business.

    Price has pleaded not guilty in Los Angeles County Superior Court. At the end of the preliminary hearing, which is expected to run several days, a judge will be asked to determine whether there’s enough evidence for the case to go to trial.

    If convicted on all charges, he faces up to 11 years behind bars.

    On Tuesday, prosecutors called an analyst with the city’s Personnel Department to testify and presented him with documents that showed Price placed his current wife Del Richardson on his city-issued healthcare plan from 2013 to 2017, before they were legally married.

    Deputy District Attorney Casey Higgins then showed the analyst a 1981 marriage certificate showing Price’s marriage to Suzette Price. The analyst said his office never saw the certificate.

    “We most likely would have asked questions,” said Paul Makowski, chief benefits analyst with the city’s Personnel Department.

    Prosecutors say Price bilked the city out of tens of thousands of dollars in health benefits for Richardson.

    Price has said he thought he was divorced from his wife when he signed Richardson up for the benefit. He and Suzette Price had been separated since 2002. His attorney Michael Schafler noted Price never sought benefits for both women at the same time.

    Prosecutors say the conflict of interest and perjury charges relate to Price failing to recuse himself from votes on projects that benefited his wife’s business, which provides relocation services and community engagement on big projects.

    For example, the Housing Authority of the city of Los Angeles paid Richardson & Associates more than $600,000 over two years from 2019 to 2020. During that same time, Price voted to support a $35 million federal grant and a state grant application for $252 million for the agency, according to prosecutors.

    In addition, LA Metro paid Richardson & Associates about $219,000 over two years from 2020 to 2021. Prosecutors say during that time, Price introduced and voted for a motion to award $30 million to Metro.

    Price’s staff allegedly alerted Price about both transactions as potential conflicts of interest, according to prosecutors.

    The preliminary hearing is expected to last six days.

  • Sponsored message
  • County leaders launch newest department
     Workers at office cubicles are looking at computer screens, responding to calls for homeless services at the L.A. County Emergency Centralized Response Center.
    Workers respond to calls for homeless services at the L.A. County Emergency Centralized Response Center.

    Topline:

    Los Angeles officials gathered Tuesday for a media event to launch the county’s newest department. The new entity faces a daunting mandate: solve the region’s deeply entrenched homelessness crisis.

    The transition: The new L.A. County Homeless Services and Housing department takes the mantle from the embattled L.A. Homeless Services Authority, which until now has overseen the funding and administration of homeless services across a county where more than 72,000 people experience homelessness on any given night.

    The accountability: County Supervisor Kathryn Barger said transferring responsibilities from LAHSA — a joint powers authority created in 1993 by the city and county of L.A. — to one centralized agency will reduce finger-pointing.

    “For a long time, it is LAHSA blames the county, the county blames the city, the city blames LAHSA — we all blame each other,” Barger said. “Accountability now ends with the [Board of Supervisors]. ... The buck is going to stop with us.”

    Read on … to learn why sales taxes are up but revenue for the new department is down.

    Los Angeles officials gathered Tuesday for a media event to launch the county’s newest department. The new entity faces a daunting mandate: solve the region’s deeply entrenched homelessness crisis.

    The new L.A. County Homeless Services and Housing department takes the mantle from the embattled regional L.A. Homeless Services Authority, known as LAHSA, which until now has overseen the funding and administration of homeless services across a county where more than 72,000 people experience homelessness on any given night.

    County Supervisor Kathryn Barger said transferring responsibilities from LAHSA — a joint powers authority created in 1993 by the city and county of L.A. — to one centralized agency will reduce finger-pointing.

    “For a long time, it is LAHSA blames the county, the county blames the city, the city blames LAHSA — we all blame each other,” Barger said. “Accountability now ends with the [Board of Supervisors]. ... The buck is going to stop with us.”

    Department launches as volunteers count LA’s unhoused 

    The launch coincided with the first day of the region’s homeless count, which is still being overseen by LAHSA. Last year, the county decided to pull hundreds of millions of dollars from LAHSA and entrust that annual funding to the new county department.

    The decision came shortly after a series of audits uncovered spending and oversight problems at the agency. Supervisor Lindsey Horvath said she hoped reducing LAHSA’s responsibilities would help the agency better execute its core duties, such as the annual homeless count.

    “Now that the focus and scope of what they're doing has been narrowed, hopefully that's where they've been focusing their time, effort and energy,” Horvath said.

    Sarah Mahin (center), a woman with light skin tone, speaks at a podium about the launch of the new county homelessness department she will direct. Standing behind her are L.A. County Supervisors Kathryn Barger and Lindsey Horvath, two women with light skin tone.
    Sarah Mahin (center) speaks about the launch of the new county homelessness department she will direct. Standing behind her are L.A. County Supervisors Kathryn Barger and Lindsey Horvath.
    (
    David Wagner/LAist
    )

    Revenue for the new department comes from Measure A, the half-cent sales tax voters opted to double from the previous quarter-cent tax in November 2024.

    Why sales taxes are up, but overall revenue is down

    Despite the increased sales tax revenue, officials say overall funding is down because of federal and state funding losses, plus allocations of sales tax revenue to a separate entity, the L.A. County Affordable Housing Solutions Agency.

    The county’s new homelessness department has a $635 million draft spending plan. It comes with proposed cuts of more than 25% to homeless services.

    “Cuts are painful for everyone, but we are making thoughtful and responsible decisions,” said Sarah Mahin, the new county department’s director. “We are prioritizing the most vulnerable people and the programs that we know work. And we're actively working with our partners to secure other funding and solutions to fill gaps.”

    One program that will see cuts is Pathway Home, which clears encampments and offers residents spots in interim housing. Mahin said spending on the motels that serve as that interim housing will go down, dropping the number of annual encampment clearances involving motels from 30 to 10.

  • LA County's oldest restaurant reopens its doors
    The interior of a diner, with blue chairs in front of a counter, with metal shelves filled with supplies behind and three chalkboards outlining the menu above
    The Original Saugus Cafe is open once again

    Topline:

    The Original Saugus Cafe, L.A. County's oldest restaurant, closed at the beginning of the year, causing unhappiness among its devoted customers. But this week, it's reopened under new management amid a legal battle over the business.

    Why it matters: The 139-year-old business is a fixture in Santa Clarita, once visited by presidents and movie starts. But a dispute between previous management and the landlord forced the historic business to shutter its doors. Disappointed customers were able to eat once again at the restaurant Monday, albeit under a new operator, Eduardo Reyna, owner of nearby Dario’s Mexican Restaurant.

    Why now: The reopening comes amid an ongoing legal dispute between the property's landlords, the Arklin family, and the family of Alfredo Mercado, who operated the cafe for almost 30 years. The two parties are fighting over rights to the name "Original Saugus Cafe," which Mercado established as an LLC in 1998. The Mercados filed a million-dollar lawsuit last week and are now adding Reyna to the suit for interfering with their business.

    The backstory: Mercado and the original landlord, Hank Arklin, had a handshake deal with no written lease. After Arklin died last August, the relationship between the two families soured. According to the Mercado family’s attorney, Steffanie Stelnick, the landlords locked the family out and withheld their equipment and inventory. She says the liquor license remains in dispute and has not been transferred to the new operator.

    What's next: The defendants were served Monday and have a set time to respond to the complaint before the case proceeds.

  • City not pursuing misdemeanor charge
    A police officer in a black uniform and sunglasses stands to the left of a cop car. The police officer is holding the arm of a man in front of him wearing a reflective vest. The man is in haandcuffs.
    Jonathan Hale was arrested in December at the corner of Wilkins and Kelton avenues in Westwood.
    Jonathan Hale said the city isn’t pursuing misdemeanor vandalism charges lodged against him after Los Angeles police arrested him in December for painting unauthorized crosswalks in Westwood.

    The hearing: At the corner of Wilkins and Kelton avenues, Hale told reporters that his hearing Tuesday lasted just about 10 minutes. According to Hale, the statute of limitations for his charges remains open until Dec. 7, a year after the street safety activist was arrested. “So they can change their mind, and I do risk arrest if I do this again,” Hale said. The hearing had been rescheduled from its original date of Jan. 5.

    The crosswalks: Police arrested Hale as he and a group of volunteers, known as Peoples’ Vision Zero, were painting the third of four crosswalk legs at the Westwood intersection. As of Tuesday, the city has not repainted, eliminated or finished the crosswalks at the intersection.

    Large rectangles are painted in white on black asphalt. There are bright orange safety bollards and signs laying against a stop sign in the background.
    One of the four crosswalks at the Westwood intersection where Hale was arrested remains unfinished. Two legs of the crosswalk were completed by Hale and his group before the L.A. police arrested the street safety activist.
    (
    Jonathan Hale
    )

    What’s next: Hale said People’s Vision Zero would continue painting crosswalks if the city does not take concrete steps toward its goal of ending traffic deaths. One way Hale said the city could make progress is by creating a community-led initiative to paint code-compliant crosswalks.

    Dig deeper into the background on Hale’s arrest.

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is kharjai.61.

    Jonathan Hale said the city isn’t pursuing misdemeanor vandalism charges lodged against him after Los Angeles police arrested him in December for painting unauthorized crosswalks in Westwood.

    The hearing: At the corner of Wilkins and Kelton avenues, Hale told reporters that his hearing Tuesday lasted just about 10 minutes. According to Hale, the statute of limitations for his charges remains open until Dec. 7, a year after the street safety activist was arrested. “So they can change their mind, and I do risk arrest if I do this again,” Hale said. The hearing had been rescheduled from its original date of Jan. 5.

    The crosswalks: Police arrested Hale as he and a group of volunteers, known as People's Vision Zero, were painting the third of four crosswalk legs at the Westwood intersection. As of Tuesday, the city has not repainted, eliminated or finished the crosswalks at the intersection.

    Large rectangles are painted in white on black asphalt. There are bright orange safety bollards and signs laying against a stop sign in the background.
    One of the four crosswalks at the Westwood intersection where Hale was arrested remains unfinished. Two legs of the crosswalk were completed by Hale and his group before the L.A. police arrested the street safety activist.
    (
    Jonathan Hale
    )

    What’s next: Hale said People’s Vision Zero would continue painting crosswalks if the city does not take concrete steps toward its goal of ending traffic deaths. One way Hale said the city could make progress is by working with his group to create a community-led initiative to paint code-compliant crosswalks.

    Dig deeper into the background on Hale’s arrest.

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is kharjai.61.