Burden of Proof is South Pasadena's first non-alcoholic bottle shop.
(
Taylor Kealy/Taylor Kealy
)
Topline:
The new South Pasadena bottle shop Burden of Proof looks to foster community for those seeking alternative drinking options.
Sober curious?: With dry January just around the corner, many of us are reigniting some of our curiosity with cutting back on alcohol. However, diving into non-alcoholic spaces can be a tad intimidating, especially if you're just starting out. That's exactly where non-alcoholic bottle shops like Burden of Proof look to meet you at — the beginning of your curiosity.
Differentiating spirits: Whether you're looking to cut back or just wanting another option to sip on during the week, there's a little something for everyone in the growing non-alcoholic space. From dealcoholized beverages such as beer or wine to non-alcoholic spirts built from the ground up, the choices for the curious are nearly endless.
Read on... to learn what goes into a non-alcoholic beverage, what distinguishes it from it's alcoholic cousin, and how to make the coziest non-alcoholic Old Fashioned.
With dry January just around the corner, many of us are reigniting some of our curiosity with cutting back on alcohol. For some, that might mean seeking out alcohol alternatives — like non-alcoholic spirits, wines, and beers.
However, diving into non-alcoholic (NA) spaces — whether it's a bar, bottle shop, or community event — can be a tad overwhelming, especially if you’re just beginning to explore that sober curious journey and you’re not entirely sure what to look out for.
“It’s definitely intimidating,” says Obreanna McReynolds, co-owner of the new non-alcoholic bottle shop Burden of Proof in South Pasadena. “To walk in and see all the products and to think, ‘If I’m here, does that mean I can never drink again? Or I’m gonna be judged?’”
The Burden of Proof
For McReynolds and her husband Dean Peterson, opening up San Gabriel Valley’s first non-alcoholic bottle shop was a convergence of personal explorations and noticing a need in the industry.
Obreanna McReynolds and Dean Peterson, co-owners of Burden of Proof
(
Taylor Kealy/Taylor Kealy
)
The two met in the summer of 2020 during the height of the pandemic and had their first date on ZOOM. For them, a typical night consisted of up to two bottles of wine.
“I prided myself going into the pandemic. I had my box of red, my box of rose, and my box of white. So, like many people, we turned to alcohol. And then coming out of [the pandemic], those drinking habits stayed.” Looking back on it now, McReynolds says she was slightly hungover for a couple of years.
However, their habits quickly changed in 2022 when Dean was diagnosed with Atrial Fibrillation — a type of irregular heartbeat — and was rushed into an emergency heart surgery. When told alcohol was an exacerbating factor in his condition, Dean gave up drinking overnight. In solidarity, Obreanna decided to cut back herself.
“ I think we both kind of expected that [this] would mean the end to going out — or having a fun drink at parties would be kind of like [having] a juice and a non-alcoholic beer here or there.”
It wasn’t until they ran into Minus Moonshine, a non-alcoholic bottle shop in Brooklyn, New York, that the pair realized the plethora of alternative options available to them — and it wasn’t just having a glass of juice. In those aisles, everything clicked.
“ We had always wished that LA had something like this, especially on the east side, where I think there are so many sort of older millennials like us who are not able to drink like we did in our 20s, maybe moving on to different life phases.”
Burden of Proof, McReynolds says, is that endeavor.
Mocktail anyone?
When it comes to alternatives, there are a few options. One is simply the non-alcoholic version of your favorite beverage that brewers have dealcoholized as part of its process. For some NA products, this extra step is where the sometimes surprising cost of these beverages stem from, McReynolds says.
The second, she says, are spirits that aren’t trying to replicate its alcoholic relative at all. “ There are a lot of spirits that are just built from the ground up to kind of fit the vibe of maybe a whiskey, so something spiced and warming that you sip slowly, neat or on the rocks.”
Then there are what’s called ‘functional’ ingredients or drinks — beverages that contain herbal and medicinal substances called nootropics or adaptogens that “make you feel a little something,” McReynold claims, “which is what people really miss about drinking oftentimes.”
Some non-alcoholic beverages can be used to cut the alcohol content of your traditional cocktail.
(
Taylor Kealy/Taylor Kealy
)
Back on the shelves of Burden of Proof, some NA spirits are sold not just as replacements but as a way to cut an alcoholic cocktail. That way, McReynolds suggests, you feel like you have a little more control over the percentage of alcohol in your beverage.
“ So it's really not necessarily an either or thing. It's a matter of more choices, more options.”
Start with what you know
If you’re new to NA spaces and you’re starting to feel the need to become a mixologist to truly enjoy your drink, McReynolds says you’re not alone. Sometimes the initial journey becomes overwhelming and people lose focus of what they’re searching for in these alternatives. Instead of feeling the need to master the skills, she says it’s best to approach NA beverages the same way you would its alcoholic brethren. For people who are starting to explore, “it's much more familiar and approachable to start with the non-alcoholic version of a drink that they already know that they like.”
And when it comes to reliable, well-liked beverages, there’s nothing cozier than a classic Old Fashioned. At Burden of Proof, they recommend from their shelves the Pathfinder whiskey alternative — a hemp and root botanical spirit.
“If you have a whiskey sized hole in your heart, the Pathfinder will fill it well.” McReynolds says. “It has the [same] complexity, the warming spices, and also the bite.”
Pathfinder Old Fashioned Recipe
To make the Pathfinder Old Fashion you will need:
2oz of Pathfinder Spirit ½ oz of demerara syrup or simple syrup 4 dashes of aromatic bitters (NA alternatives welcome as well) 1 orange peel for garnish
“Fear not, I even have a drink every now and then”
For McReynolds and Peterson, alternative bottle shops like theirs serve a crucial role for the growing NA movement — especially now with so many options available for sober curious consumers online. “ I think bottle shops are such an important place to go for education, to go to try things, to go for guidance,” she says.
Bottle shops like Burden of Proof can serve as important information centers for the NA community.
(
Taylor Kealy/Taylor Kealy
)
Despite the shop being only a few weeks old, McReynolds has already seen the fruits of its educational arm in action. “It’s really cool to see people in the shop start comparing notes and talking to each other” about alternative options they’ve tried and are recommending — people, she says, who are often casual alcoholic drinkers just scouting for another choice.
“I think it’s the most exciting part to just sort of see the little seeds of community being planted.”
And for those sober curious leaning into Dry January, skeptical about what the beginning of their journey means, McReynolds says, “Fear not, I even have a drink every now and then.” And at Burden of Proof, it’s not about giving up or condemning alcohol, she adds, “rather, we’re trying to just give people more choices.”
Gab Chabrán
covers what's happening in food and culture for LAist.
Published December 10, 2025 5:14 PM
The Varnish's iconic vintage cash register, a symbol of the speakeasy era that defined downtown L.A.'s cocktail revival.
(
Courtesy Eric Alperin
)
Topline:
A trio of bartenders who trained at The Varnish — the influential speakeasy once hidden behind Cole's — are reuniting for a one-night, classics-only pop-up at Firstborn in Chinatown. The event offers glimpse into the cocktail style that helped reshape L.A.'s drinking culture.
Why now: This is the first time in years that multiple Varnish alums are reuniting behind one bar, arriving at a moment when interest in L.A.'s cocktail history has resurged. With holiday crowds in full swing, a classics-only menu also offers a grounding, back-to-basics counterpoint to the season's usual excess.
Why it's important: The Varnish was a defining force in L.A.'s modern cocktail revival. The bar, which opened in 2009, brought Sasha Petraske's precise, curated, classic approach to cocktails — a counterpoint to the city's previous culture of showy and sweet drinks — and remains influential long after his passing.
On Monday, Los Angeles travels back in time. Well, sort of.
The Varnish, the famed speakeasy hidden behind a secret door at the back of Cole’s French Dip, will be reconstituted for one night only as part of a special pop-up at Firstborn in Chinatown.
(Meanwhile, Cole's itself will be open through the holiday season, with its last night of regular service planned for Dec. 31.)
The iconic bar, which shuttered in 2024 after a 15-year run, holds a special place in the hearts of many Angelenos, who believe it's where L.A.’s modern cocktail revival truly began. The event reunites three bartenders who all came up through The Varnish’s famously exacting school of cocktail-making. Kenzo Han (recently named Esquire’s Bartender of the Year) cut his teeth there before moving into roles that established him as one of L.A.’s most respected classic-cocktail technicians. Wolf Alexander and Miles Caballes emerged from the same pipeline.
One night only
Kenzo Han, bar director at Firstborn and former Varnish bartender, is hosting two fellow Varnish alumni for the Monday pop-up.
(
Ron De Angelis
)
Han is now Firstborn’s bar director, where he leads a tight, classics-leaning bar program. The restaurant sits inside Mandarin Plaza, where chef Anthony Wang turns out playful comfort dishes with Chinese and American influences. It’s a lively, unfussy neighborhood hangout just off Broadway, surrounded by neon, noodle shops and family-style restaurants.
The Varnish connection
All three bartenders trace their lineage back to Sasha Petraske, who, in 2009, co-founded The Varnish with Eric Alperin and Cedd Moses, the owner of Cole’s French Dip.
Petraske traded '90s flash for pre-Prohibition craft: fresh citrus over sour mix, precise technique over bottle tricks, elevating cocktails from party fuel to art form.
Miles Caballes brings his Varnish training back to the bar for one night.
(
Courtesy Firstborn
)
Wolf Alexander, another Varnish alum, demonstrates the precise technique that defined the speakeasy's approach.
(
Courtesy Firstborn
)
The Varnish became the city’s clearest expression of Petraske’s cocktail philosophy, where his playbook of precision, restraint and quiet hospitality took root on the West Coast. (Petraske passed in 2015.)
Han, Alexander and Caballes all trained in that environment, absorbing the Petraske rules of clean builds, tight technique and no-nonsense cocktails.
What to expect
For one night only, from 6-10 p.m., the trio will channel that tradition through a Varnish-style menu: curated classics only, no custom builds, with all cocktails priced at $20. Two featured drinks nod directly to the bar's lineage. The Spring Blossom — created at The Varnish — combines mezcal, French aperitifs, including Suze and Lillet Blanc, mole bitters and a grapefruit twist. Death & Taxes features scotch, gin, sweet vermouth, Benedictine (a herbal liqueur), Angostura and orange bitters, finished with a lemon twist.
On the food side, chef Anthony Wang is reviving his cult-favorite Blood Orange Chicken Sando ($20), served with radicchio, alongside a limited run of his Shanghainese-style McRib ($24) — a playful, sweet-and-sour riff built around tender ribs and “all the stuff” that made the original such a guilty pleasure.
The blood orange chicken sandwich at Firstborn from chef Anthony Wang.
(
Ron De Angelis
)
Expect a casual, walk-in-only atmosphere where guests can grab a seat at the bar and let the cocktail nostalgia wash over them.
Whether you were a Varnish regular or only heard the stories, this pop-up is a rare chance to see that style alive again — familiar faces, bespoke cocktails and the kind of muscle-memory bartending that defined an era of L.A. drinking culture. For newer drinkers, it’s a glimpse of the cocktail philosophy that shaped the city as we know it.
It’ll likely get busy early, and the food specials may run out fast — but that’s part of the charm. The Varnish’s legacy has always been about small rooms, sharp precision and moments you catch only if you’re paying attention.
Should LA charge more to opponents of new housing?
David Wagner
covers housing in Southern California, a place where the lack of affordable housing contributes to homelessness.
Published December 10, 2025 4:47 PM
A construction worker walks through the Ruby Street apartments construction site in Castro Valley on Feb. 6, 2024. The construction project is funded by the No Place Like Home bond, which passed in 2018 to create affordable housing for homeless residents experiencing mental health issues.
(
Camille Cohen
/
CalMatters
)
Topline:
In the city of Los Angeles, neighbors or homeowner groups who choose to fight approvals of new housing are required to pay a fee when filing an appeal. Right now, that fee is $178 — about 1% of the amount the city says it costs to process the appeal. But that fee soon will go up.
The details: On Wednesday, the L.A. City Council voted to increase the fee to $229 but rejected a proposal by the city administrative officer that would have raised the cost for appellants to more than $22,800, or 100% of the cost. Some advocates for making housing easier to build argued the city should have adopted the higher fee.
Read on … to learn what developers will have to pay if they want to fight a project denial.
In the city of Los Angeles, neighbors or homeowner groups who choose to fight approvals of new housing are required to pay a fee when filing an appeal.
Right now, that fee is $178 — about 1% of the amount the city says it costs to process the appeal. But that fee soon will go up.
On Wednesday, the L.A. City Council voted to increase the fee to $229 but rejected a proposal by the city administrative officer that would have raised the cost for appellants to more than $22,800, or 100% of the cost.
Some advocates for making housing easier to build argued the city should have adopted the higher fee.
“Appeals of approved projects create delays that make it harder to build housing and disincentivize future housing from being proposed,” said Jacob Pierce, a policy associate with the group Abundant Housing L.A.
At a time when L.A.’s budget is strained, Pierce said, if someone thinks a project was wrongly approved, “They should put their money where their mouth is and pay the full fee."
The City Council unanimously approved another new fee structure put forward by the city’s Planning Department.
While fees will remain relatively low for housing project opponents, developers will have to pay $22,453 to appeal projects that previously had been denied.
A November report from the city administrative officer said setting fees higher to recover the full cost of processing would have aligned with the city’s financial policies. Generally, fees are set higher when applicants are asking for a service that benefits them alone.
“When a service or activity benefits the public at large, there is generally little to no recommended fee amount,” the report said.
Pierce said he hoped a City Council committee would reconsider the higher fee proposal next year. With the city falling far short of its goal to create nearly a half-million new homes by 2029, he said the city needs to discourage obstruction of new housing.
“Slowing down the construction of housing is expensive for all of us,” Pierce said.
Cato Hernández
covers important issues that affect the everyday lives of Southern Californians.
Published December 10, 2025 4:16 PM
A file photo of an ink-based printer.
(
Neilson Barnard
/
Getty Images
)
Topline:
The L.A. City Council has voted to create a new ordinance that bans the sale of certain single-use ink cartridges from online and local retailers.
Why now? L.A. is recommending that a ban target single-use cartridges that don’t have a take-back program or can’t be refilled. That's because they’re winding up in the landfill, where, L.A. Sanitation says, they can leach harmful substances into the ground.
What’s next? The City Attorney’s Office is drafting the ordinance. It will go before the council’s energy and environment committee before reaching a full vote.
Read on ... to see how the ban could work.
Los Angeles could become the first city in the U.S. to ban ink cartridges that can be used only once.
The L.A. City Council unanimously voted Wednesday to approve the creation of an ordinance that prohibits their sale. The move comes after more than a year of debate over the terms.
Why the potential ban
This builds upon the city’s effort to reach zero waste, including phasing out single-use plastics. You’re likely familiar with some of those efforts — such as only getting plastic foodware by request and banning single-use carryout bags at stores. Multiple plastic bans have been suggested, like for single-use vapes and bag clips, but now it’s ink’s turn.
The cartridges are tough to dispose of because of the plastic, metal and chemicals inside, according to the city. They’re also classified as regulated waste in the state because they can leach toxic substances into the environment, such as volatile organic compounds and heavy metals.
That poses a problem. L.A.’s curbside recycling program can’t recycle the cartridges, and while its hazardous waste program can take them, a significant portion end up in landfills.
Major printer manufacturers and some ink retailers have take-back programs for used cartridges so they can get refilled. However, L.A. Sanitation says there are certain single-use cartridges that don’t have recovery programs. These are usually cartridges that work with a printer but aren’t name brand.
How outlawing them could work
LASAN has spent months figuring out what a ban would cover — and it hasn’t been without pushback. The city’s energy and environment committee pressed the department back in September on how effective a ban would be.
Ultimately, the committee moved it forward with a promise that LASAN would come back with more details, including environmental groups’ stance, concrete data to back up the need and a public education plan.
The department’s current recommendation is that the ordinance should prohibit retail and online establishments from selling any single-use ink cartridge, whether sold separately or with a printer, to people in the city. Retailers that don’t follow the rules would get fined.
So what does single-use mean here? The ban would affect a printer cartridge that:
is not collected or recovered through a take-back program
cannot be remanufactured, refilled or reused
infringes upon intellectual property rights or violates any applicable local, state or federal law
Any cartridges that meet one of these points would fall under the ban, though you still could get them outside L.A.
The proposed ordinance will go to the committee first while LASAN works on a public education plan.
If it ends up getting approved by the full council, the ban likely would go into full effect 12 months later.
Julia Barajas
explores how college students achieve their goals, whether they’re fresh out of high school, pursuing graduate work or looking to join the labor force through alternative pathways.
Published December 10, 2025 3:36 PM
Cal State Dominguez Hills faces significant budget pressure.
(
Julie Leopo
/
LAist
)
Topline:
Faculty, students, alumni and community partners are demanding the California State University, Dominguez Hills, administration withdraw a proposal to eliminate six academic programs.
Why it matters: In addition to fewer academic options, according to the California Faculty Association — the union that represents CSU professors, lecturers, librarians, counselors and coaches — an estimated 40 jobs will be eliminated at Cal State Dominguez Hills if this plan is approved.
What the university says: "The university’s current financial constraints limit our ability to invest in new or expanded programs that could meet those needs," university spokesperson Lilly McKibbin said via email.
She added that no final decisions have been made and that the process to end a program would give faculty a chance to "review data and hear from the campus community."
What educators say: “These programs are not expendable — they are essential,” said Stephen McFarland, a labor studies professor at the campus and a CFA executive board member. “Eliminating them would narrow students’ opportunities at a moment when they need more pathways, not fewer.”
The backstory: The CSU system is facing a $2.3 billion budget gap, despite tuition increases. The gap is rooted in cuts to state funding and increased labor costs. The university did not immediately respond to a request for comment.