Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Landlords now have to pay for no-fault evictions
    An overhead shot of a beautiful building that takes up an entire city block
    The Pasadena City Hall

    Topline:

    New financial assistance has been approved for tenants living in Pasadena who must vacate their rental units through no fault of their own — and they're among the most generous offered in the region. Landlords are balking.

    Why it matters: Pasadena is among a slew of Southern California cities that have adopted tenant laws, from caps on rent increases to limits on evictions amid sky high housing costs.

    Why now: The Pasadena Rental Housing Board approved the financial assistance in late September. The vote was 8 to 2, with one abstaining member.

    New financial assistance has been approved for tenants living in Pasadena who must vacate their rental units through no fault of their own — and they're among the most generous offered in the region.

    About these fees

    The relocation fees range from around $6,000 to just over $37,500 depending on factors including the length of tenancy, the number of bedrooms in the unit, and in special cases, a tenant's age and the state of their health.

    They apply to "no fault" evictions, which let landlords take back their rental properties for things like major repairs, or owner and family member occupancy. The new fees, plus an additional moving expense allowance, also cover tenants who are seeing excessive rent increases.

    The Pasadena Rental Housing Board approved the financial assistance in late September. The vote was 8 to 2, with one abstaining member.

    A growing number of cities pass tenant laws

    Pasadena is among a slew of Southern California cities that have adopted tenant laws, from caps on rent increases to limits on evictions amid sky high housing costs. The new relocation fees are modeled after those passed in the city and county of Los Angeles.

    "Those are the nearest municipalities to Pasadena and probably the most similar to the conditions that we're experiencing here," said Ryan Bell, chair of the Pasadena Rental Housing Board who voted for the fees.

    Bell said the board's policy committee took into account what's considered a fair rate to rent a place in Pasadena in determining the amounts.

    How it works in Pasadena

    Two charts showing fees landlords in Pasadena must pay to remove tenants from their rental units.
    Pasadena's relocation fees for renters displaced by no-fault evictions. "Special Circumstances Household" are those consist of at least one tenant who is over the age of 60, terminally ill, disabled or is a child.

    "The relocation assistance, even if it seems like a lot of money to folks, is something that runs out after a while," Bell said. "Because if I'm paying $200, $300, even maybe $1,000 more per month in rent, you can see that even $20,000 only goes so far."

    Landlords push back

    Landlord groups are balking at the fees.

    "Typically, what other cities have are three months at the most. Under California law, it's one month. And so, [Pasadena has] far exceeded any other city in California," said Dan Yukelson, executive director of The Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles.

    Yukelson said the fees will dissuade property owners from making the necessary repairs to their rental units, and unduly penalizes landlords.

    "Owners are suffering financially today," Yukelson said. "They've lost jobs. They need to move into their own properties just to have a place to live. I'm hearing about that more and more. And to have to pay this type of bounty of $37,000 and some change is just ridiculous."

    Yukelson said the hefty amounts could open the policy up to litigation.

    What's next

    It's something that the Pasadena Rental Housing Board has looked into. Karen Tideman is a lawyer who's been working with the board.

    "The technical challenge would be that relocation assistance results in a regulatory taking of the property owner's property, depriving them of use of the property. That's the primary challenge," Tideman said. "We think that the fee is reasonable will withstand a court challenge."

    Bell, the board chair, added that Pasadena's relocation fees are in line with other cities in the region, specifically noting that Santa Monica's program provides just over $37,000 to displaced tenant in similar circumstances.

    He added that the rental board plans to consider ways to lessen the fees' effect on landlords with "one or two" rental units.

    But in a city where 57% of households are renting, the fees are meant to preserve the place for everyone.

    "We're trying to just help people relocate and be able to afford to live in their community when they're displaced due to a decision that they didn't make — they didn't do anything wrong," he said. "The goal is that if folks want to stay in Pasadena, then they should be able to do that.

    Go deeper: Will Pasadena Be The Next City To Adopt Rent Control? Voters Will Decide This Election

  • Traffic tickets coming to makers this summer
    A white four-door sedan with a camera on top of it is zipping through a street
    A Waymo car drives along a street on March 01, 2023 in San Francisco, California. The service is coming to L.A.

    Topline:

    California law enforcement will soon be able to issue traffic tickets to driverless cars, such as robotaxis and Waymos. The Department of Motor Vehicles announced this week that it adopted the new rules, which go into effect July 1.

    Why are we ticketing robots? The rules are meant to enhance safety requirements, oversight and enforcement, according to the DMV. Driverless robotaxis, such as Waymo, have taken over parts of Los Angeles and caused outcry for crashing into parked cars in Echo Park or injuring a child near a Santa Monica elementary school. Other companies, such as Zoox, also plan to expand into Los Angeles. Waymo did not immediately respond to LAist’s request for comment.

    What are the rules: According to the new law, officers can issue a notice to the manufacturer if they see an autonomous vehicle break traffic laws. Manufacturers that don’t comply could have their permits restricted or suspended.

    Other highlights: 

    • Local emergency officials can issue electric geofencing boundaries to clear autonomous vehicles from active emergency zones. 
    • Local governments can also issue temporary “do not enter” or “restricted” zones in response to public safety issues. 
    • Carmakers must provide access to the manual override system on autonomous vehicles and allow two-way communication lines between operators and first responders. 

    Go deeper… We took self-driving Waymo cars for a test ride. This is what happened.

  • Sponsored message
  • Thousands expected at MacArthur Park rally
    A May Day protester dances with Mexican and United States flags during a rally after a protest march in the streets of downtown Los Angeles to call for immigration reform Thursday, May 1, 2008, in Los Angeles.
    Hundreds of organizations are rallying at MacArthur Park on Friday in one of many events recognizing May Day, which is expected to draw thousands of people.

    Topline:

    Hundreds of organizations are rallying at MacArthur Park on Friday in one of many events recognizing May Day, which is expected to draw thousands of people. 

    The details: The rally began at 10 a.m. with speakers expected to take the stage, and then the event will march to City Hall around noon. Advocacy groups from different backgrounds, like immigrants’ rights, housing, LGBTQ rights, and economic justice, will unite for the cause of workers’ rights. Organizers are calling for a boycott and will rally under the banner, “Solo El Pueblo Shuts it Down – No Work, No School, No Shopping” with the march ending at Gloria Molina Grand Park at the foot of City Hall. 

    Read on... for more on the demonstration and what activists are calling for.

    Hundreds of organizations are rallying at MacArthur Park on Friday in one of many events recognizing May Day, which is expected to draw thousands of people. 

    The rally began at 10 a.m. with speakers, and then the event will march to City Hall around noon. Westlake is no stranger to International Workers’ Day, said Victor Narro, project director with the UCLA James Lawson Jr. Worker Justice Center, which sits across the street from MacArthur Park.

    “We’re dealing with so much this year, and I think May Day is going to be a chance for us to come together,” Narro told The LA Local ahead of the rally. 

    Advocacy groups from different backgrounds, like immigrants’ rights, housing, LGBTQ rights, and economic justice, will unite for the cause of workers’ rights, Narro said.

    “It’s really an inclusive march,” he said. “This really is unlike any other march.”

    Organizers also hope to make the event safe for undocumented immigrants and emphasize that they are taking security seriously.

    “You just don’t know with this administration,” he added. 

    Organizers are calling for a boycott and will rally under the banner, “Solo El Pueblo Shuts it Down – No Work, No School, No Shopping” with the march ending at Gloria Molina Grand Park at the foot of City Hall. 

    This year’s May Day also marks the 20th anniversary of La Gran Marcha, when millions of people took to the streets around the country to protest proposed legislation that would have included making it a felony offense to be an undocumented immigrant.

    The event is still fresh in a lot of people’s minds, including Juan Aguilar, a supermarket worker who came to the United States in 1989 and participated in the 2006 march in downtown L.A.

    “I was really impressed by the number of people there. And I didn’t feel afraid. People weren’t afraid,” he said at a sign-making event for this year’s May Day rally at the Korean Immigrant Workers Advocates in Koreatown. 

    He feels it’s so much different now. Back then, Aguilar said, people were only afraid near the border.

    “Once you were inside the country, you could move freely. Now it’s everywhere,” he said. “People are afraid because raids can happen at any moment. At work, on the street, leaving court, anywhere.”

    The fear in the community has prompted Aguilar to participate in this year’s rally.

    Friday will also be Jay Lee’s first time participating in the May Day rally and march. He pointed to the role labor movements have played in shaping migration and identity within Korean communities.

    “Korea’s got this huge history of labor,” Lee said. “The existence of the Korean diaspora here is inherently tied to the labor movement in Korea.”

    For Lee, a Korean American, this year’s May Day is especially significant. It marks the first year South Korea has designated May 1 as a mandatory public holiday for all workers, including those in the public sector. Previously, only private-sector workers had the day off.

    He said this year’s march is also about solidarity across communities.

    “We’re going to be marching with Black workers, the Latino centers, the Filipino centers,” Lee said. “We’re going to be all marching together as one voice, and I think that’s really cool.”

    The LA Local has reporters on the ground. Check back for updates, and see more photos and video on our Instagram.

  • The eaglets have been named Sandy and Luna
    Two young, gray fuzzy eaglets are perched in a nest of twigs and sticks at the top of a tall tree. An adult bald eagle's head is outstretched to feed them food.
    Sandy and Luna in Big Bear's famous bald eagle nest Friday.

    Topline:

    The two chicks growing in Big Bear’s famous bald eagle nest have been named.

    Why it matters: The eaglets will be called Sandy and Luna, according to Friends of Big Bear Valley, the nonprofit that runs a popular YouTube livestream of the nest and is working to preserve acres of land in the area.

    Why now: The organization announced the results of this year’s chick naming contest Friday after inviting the eagles’ fanbase to submit suggestions with a donation last month.

    The details: Sandy was the most popular name entered into the contest with more than 3,700 submissions, according to Friends of Big Bear Valley.

    The backstory: Sandy Steers was an environmental advocate who helped launch the eagle livestream and the nonprofit’s late executive director. She died in February, a few weeks before the pair of eggs were laid.

    Go deeper: Environmental groups launch $10M fundraiser to buy land near Big Bear’s famous bald eagle nest

    The two chicks growing in Big Bear’s famous bald eagle nest have been named.

    The offspring of famous parents Jackie and Shadow will be called Sandy and Luna, according to Friends of Big Bear Valley, the nonprofit that runs a popular YouTube livestream of the nest and is working to preserve acres of land in the area.

    The organization announced the results of this year’s chick naming contest Friday after inviting the eagles’ fanbase to submit suggestions with a donation last month.

    Keeping with tradition, the final votes were left up to Big Bear Valley third-grade students. A list of names was selected randomly from the nearly 64,000 public fundraiser submissions and delivered on ballots to the students, who are studying bald eagles in school, earlier this week.

    Sandy was the most popular name entered into the contest with more than 3,700 submissions, according to Friends of Big Bear Valley.

    The name is an homage to Sandy Steers, an environmental advocate who helped launch the eagle livestream and the nonprofit’s late executive director. She died in February, a few weeks before the pair of eggs were laid.

    “Please know that although Sandy would not have wanted us to outright name one of the eaglets Sandy, she would have been honored that you and the students went through the process and named one of the 2026 eaglets after her,” the organization wrote on Facebook Friday to its more than 1.2 million followers.

    Chick naming traditions

    Sandy and Luna have been known as Chick 1 and Chick 2, respectively, since they hatched in early April.

    Once the eaglets arrived, Friends of Big Bear Valley was swarmed with hundreds of requests to name one of the chicks “Sandy.”

    But it’s a right of passage for the Big Bear third graders to name the chicks, and the tradition was “one of Sandy’s greatest joys,” according to Jenny Voisard, Friends of Big Bear Valley’s media manager.

    Jackie and Shadow, the adult birds whose parenting saga each nesting season has captured human attention around the world, have had previous chicks named Stormy, BBB (for Big Bear Baby), Simba, Spirit and Cookie through a similar process.

    “Last year, because Jackie and Shadow did not have chicks the previous two seasons, she opened it up to the other grades that didn’t get to participate when they were in the third grade,” Voisard said in a statement. “That was Sandy. Education was extremely important to her.”

    Last season’s eaglets were dubbed Sunny and Gizmo by the Big Bear elementary students, who voted on 30 finalists pulled from about 54,000 name choices crowdsourced in a week-long fundraiser.

    What’s next for Sandy and Luna

    The nonprofit asked people to submit gender neutral names because the sex of each eaglet is not yet known.

    Sandy and Luna are nearly 4 weeks old as of Friday, but once the eaglets reach around 9 to 10 weeks old, there should be signs that can help Friends of Big Bear Valley make an educated guess.

    Some of the signs the nonprofit looks out for include the chick’s size, ankle thickness and vocal pitch.

    Generally speaking, female bald eagles are larger than males. Female bald eagles also tend to have larger vocal organs — the syrinx — which leads to deeper, lower-pitched vocalizations, according to Friends of Big Bear Valley.

    The only definitive way to know the eaglets’ sex is through a blood test, which nonprofit officials have said is unlikely. There is no human intervention in the nest during nesting season, according to Voisard.

    When the eaglets are around 10 to 14 weeks old, they could fledge, or take their first flight away from the nest overlooking Big Bear Lake.

    But as the nonprofit often reminds fans, nature is in charge of the timeline — a previous eaglet named Simba took 16 weeks to fledge.

    Fledglings from Southern California have been spotted as far north as British Columbia, as far east as Yellowstone and as far south as Baja California, according to Friends of Big Bear Valley.

    Big picture progress

    Friends of Big Bear Valley is continuing to lead a $10 million fundraiser to buy more than 62-acres near the nest to preserve it from a planned housing project called Moon Camp.

    Instead, the organization and the San Bernardino Mountains Land Trust want the land to be placed under a permanent conservatorship.

    Officials say “Save Moon Camp” is the most ambitious fundraising effort in the history of Friends of Big Bear Valley. It’s raised more than $2.3 million as of Friday.

  • A group sues to block a union ballot measure
    A man with medium skin tone, wearing black scrubs and glasses, sits in front of a computer set up in an exam room in a doctor's office.
    Dr. Francisco Tejeda prepares for a telehealth appoinment with a patient at San Ysidro Health in San Diego on Feb. 23, 2024.

    Topline:

    A clinic group sued to block a union ballot measure that would dictate how community health centers spend money.

    More details: The California Primary Care Association, which represents more than 2,300 community health clinics, and Open Door Community Health Centers filed a lawsuit Thursday to stop Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West from placing an initiative on the November ballot that would dictate how clinics spend money.

    The backstory: Earlier this month, union members turned in more than 1 million signatures to qualify the “Clinic Funding Accountability and Transparency Act” for the ballot. The union collected nearly double the number of signatures required to place the proposal before voters.

    Read on... for more on the measure and lawsuit.

    California’s billionaires are not the only ones fighting back against the state’s largest health workers union this election season. Now the clinics are too.

    The California Primary Care Association, which represents more than 2,300 community health clinics, and Open Door Community Health Centers filed a lawsuit Thursday to stop Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West from placing an initiative on the November ballot that would dictate how clinics spend money.

    The clinic measure is less prominent than the billionaire-backed fight against a wealth tax, but recently came closer to appearing before voters.

    The clinic’s lawsuit, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, argues that the union’s ballot measure would interfere with federal laws and regulations that place strict spending requirements on nonprofit health clinics that serve low-income patients.

    Joey Cachuela, general counsel for the clinic association said in a statement the initiative threatens patient care. “We are filing this preelection challenge and need the courts to act to prevent this drastic measure from ever going to the ballot. Patient lives are at risk,” Cachuela said.

    A spokesperson for the healthcare workers union did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Two people with light skin tone wearing navy blue t-shirts with text on the backs "Street health team" examine a man with dark skin tone standing in an encampment next to a large tree.
    Dr. Elizabeth Sophy, far right, who is a part of Father Joe’s Villages Street Health Team, examines Devlin Chambers at an encampment in downtown San Diego on March 22, 2024. Chambers, 60, said he has a pinched nerve in his back.
    (
    Kristian Carreon
    /
    CalMatters
    )

    Earlier this month, union members turned in more than 1 million signatures to qualify the “Clinic Funding Accountability and Transparency Act” for the ballot. The union collected nearly double the number of signatures required to place the proposal before voters.

    Under California’s election rules, proposals that gather enough signatures qualify for the ballot after the Secretary of State’s office verifies their validity.

    The union proposal would require federally qualified health centers to spend 90% of revenue on services that fulfill the stated mission to “provide primary and preventive care to low-income and underserved populations.” It would also punish clinics that do not adhere to this spending formula and place the money in a state-operated account that could later be used for worker training and staffing programs.

    “It is the intent of this initiative to create a reasonable minimum standard of mission-directed

    spending … to ensure clinic patient service delivery and workforce stability is prioritized over management and overhead spending,” the initiative states.

    Union leaders and members argue that clinics spend too much money on executive pay and administrative overhead and too little on patients. They also contend that some clinics spend only half of their revenue on direct patient care, an allegation that clinics call misleading.

    “We have one message for our clinics: Put patients first. It’s time for an end to wasteful spending. It’s time to make sure clinics are putting their money in patient care and not CEO-pay,” said Brisa Barrera, a medical assistant from Santa Rosa Community Health during an April rally to celebrate delivering the signatures.

    The clinic association, however, argues that the initiative would illegally force hundreds of community health centers to close by stripping nearly $2 billion from health systems.

    Tory Starr, chief executive of Open Door Community Health Centers, which operates clinics in Humboldt and Del Norte counties, said the measure would be “devastating” to the organization’s rural patients and would result in layoffs, reduced services and closures.

    A nearly identical version of the ballot initiative failed to pass in the state Legislature earlier this year.

    The initiative is one of three measures the union has submitted to the ballot. Another aims to limit health care executive pay at $450,000, and SEIU-UHW is also backing the “billionaire’s tax” that has drawn ire from both Democrats and Republicans.

    Supported by the California Health Care Foundation (CHCF), which works to ensure that people have access to the care they need, when they need it, at a price they can afford. Visit www.chcf.org to learn more.

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.