Protect local news!

Be one of 5,000 supporters to make a monthly gift during our fall member drive and help strengthen our nonprofit newsroom.
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Report finds late payments, lax oversight
    Outreach workers, seen from the back, are walking down a street. A man and a woman on the left are wearing tops with the words LAHSA on them; the man on the right is wearing a neon green jacket. All three are wearing blue masks
    LAHSA’s Homeless Engagement Team does outreach to the unhoused community, in April of 2020.

    Topline:

    A new audit finds that a Los Angeles homeless services agency with an $875 million annual budget has routinely paid service providers late, failed to track whether contracts were followed and, in some cases, gave taxpayer funds meant for other purposes to providers who weren’t supposed to receive the money.

    The context: The findings released Tuesday night by the L.A. County Auditor-Controller’s office highlight long-standing issues at the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) and raise new questions about how the agency is spending large pools of public money.

    The details: The auditors wrote that the agency had misused funds by taking money from one government funder “to pay for services provided under another government funder’s contract/grant.” The auditors said, “LAHSA must discontinue this practice to ensure financial resources and operations for other programs are not inappropriately (and negatively) impacted.”

    Read on… to learn how LAHSA officials are responding, and what comes next.

    A new audit finds that a Los Angeles homeless services agency with an $875-million annual budget has routinely paid service providers late, failed to track whether contracts were followed and, in some cases, gave taxpayer funds meant for other purposes to providers who weren’t supposed to receive the money.

    The findings released Tuesday night by the L.A. County Auditor-Controller’s office highlight long-standing issues at the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) and raise new questions about how the agency is spending large pools of public money.

    L.A. County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath, who requested the audit earlier this year, said she now plans to introduce a motion to create a new county department responsible for homelessness response.

    "The audit findings make clear the structure we have for service delivery is not working. We need greater accountability and bold action," Horvath said. "The public is frustrated and there is no time to waste in delivering meaningful results.”

    It's not yet clear what the proposal would mean for L.A. County's relationship with LAHSA, an agency established in 1993 and jointly overseen by the city and county of L.A. The agency currently administers funding from the county, the city, the state of California and the federal government. This year, the county contributed $348 million to LAHSA's budget.

    How LAHSA is responding

    LAHSA officials disputed a number of the audit's findings, and maintained that some problems were unique to the COVID-19 pandemic.

    "The spending practices captured during the COVID-19 years of this audit should be viewed as an essential investment that contributed to achieving critical public health and service delivery outcomes," wrote Va Lecia Adams Kellum, LAHSA's CEO, in response to the audit.

    After LAist's story was published, Adams Kellum sent an internal email to LAHSA staff citing LAist reporting and calling Horvath's proposal "alarming and confusing."

    "At this time, I, along with LAHSA leadership, are [sic] working diligently to ascertain clarity on this proposal," Adams Kellum went on to say in the email obtained by LAist and confirmed by LAHSA spokesperson Paul Rubenstein. "In the meantime, please know that we are not treating this situation lightly. Our employees take top priority. The work that you all do matters — you save lives, plain and simple."

    Among the 10 issues identified as top priorities, the auditors wrote that LAHSA had misused funds by taking money from one government funder “to pay for services provided under another government funder’s contract/grant.”

    “LAHSA must discontinue this practice to ensure financial resources and operations for other programs are not inappropriately (and negatively) impacted,” the audit stated.

    What is LAHSA? 

    Read our explainer to learn more about the L.A. region’s key homeless services agency. 

    LAHSA has repeatedly found itself in the spotlight over public frustration with rising homelessness in recent years despite billions of dollars in new voter-approved funding.

    Adams Kellum, who took over as LAHSA’s CEO in March 2023, told reporters in a news conference last Wednesday ahead of the audit’s release that some of the years covered by the report predate her tenure. She said LAHSA has already worked to address issues, and has rolled out new online dashboards to better track the agency’s performance.

    “It is critically important that we are measuring our work and doing everything that we say we're doing,” Adams Kellum said. “We want to be able to show what's working. And in any report card, you also see what's not working — what improvements are needed.”

    What else did the audit find?

    Billions of dollars in new funding has been spent in recent years to address the region’s homelessness crisis, but the number of people experiencing homelessness across L.A. County has risen 37% since 2017. The latest count showed that about 75,000 people across the county are unhoused on any given night.

    The Auditor-Controller’s office undertook an in-depth financial review of LAHSA with the goal of giving taxpayers and elected leaders a closer look at how homelessness funding is being spent to get people off the streets, connected with service programs and placed into shelters and apartments.

    Among the audit’s findings:

    • LAHSA hasn’t always paid service providers on time, even when funds were available. The auditors found that in a sampling between July 2023 and May 2024, LAHSA paid five out of 13 subcontractors late.
    • The agency in some cases paid providers using the wrong funding source. For example, auditors found that one L.A. County subcontractor was paid 14 days before LAHSA received county funding intended to cover that cost. LAHSA confirmed to the auditors that they used another unrelated funding source.
    • LAHSA does an inadequate job of monitoring contracts to make sure providers are complying with the terms of their funding. The auditors found that about half (51%) of LAHSA’s planned contract reviews did not include methods for monitoring a provider’s compliance with service delivery requirements.
    • LAHSA did not establish agreements with service providers to require them to repay nearly $51 million in advances that the agency provided in 2017 using county taxpayer dollars. By July 2024, only $2.5 million of that money had been paid back.
    • The auditors discovered an additional $15 million in outstanding cash advances to other providers — some dating back to 2016 — that still haven’t been paid back. Some providers with unpaid advances no longer contract with LAHSA.

    LAHSA officials were given a chance in the audit to respond to the findings. They disagreed fully or partially with most of the points above, but agreed that payments to providers were often late. For the findings they agreed with, they laid out timelines for fixing the problems.

    Why is this all coming out now? 

    The audit was initiated by a motion earlier this year from L.A. County Supervisors Horvath and Kathryn Barger.

    Barger on Wednesday said she was "deeply disturbed by what this LAHSA audit reveals."

    "It’s clear to me that management practices need to dramatically improve at LAHSA," she said in a statement. "I’m also disappointed that LHASA's management team responded by pushing back on some of the audit’s conclusions instead of taking full ownership of its findings and charting a new and improved path forward."

    The audit follows a separate analysis by the L.A. City Controller’s Office released on Thursday that found the city of L.A. did not spend at least $513 million in public funds that were budgeted to help with the homeless crisis during fiscal year 2024. The office said a lack of staff and old technology contributed to the spending problems.

    Concerns about LAHSA’s performance stretch back years, with some elected leaders suggesting the city should consider withdrawing from the agency. A federal judge overseeing a major homelessness case in L.A. has recently chided LAHSA officials for failing to provide timely data on spending and outcomes for a separate, ongoing audit commissioned by the court.

    The judge has ordered officials from LAHSA, the city and the county into court Thursday morning to justify why they’re behind schedule in providing auditors with needed information.

    Is any progress being made? 

    The payment delays identified in the audit have long been familiar to service providers who say they often wait months for reimbursement. Outreach workers who help unhoused people typically earn low wages, often struggling to pay their own rent. Lengthy payment disruptions can put their jobs at risk.

    Back in 2018, the Auditor-Controller’s office found that LAHSA was failing to pay service providers on time. By 2021, the office reported that LAHSA had only partially fixed the problem.

    Agency leaders said during the news conference last week that LAHSA has paid about 80% of contracts on time over the past two years.

    LAHSA leaders added that their staffers are now checking in with providers on a monthly basis and gauging their performance through more frequent “desk audits.”

    Janine Trejo, LAHSA’s chief financial officer, said, “We go out and we conduct a monitoring of the service providers, their facilities, their expenses and a sampling of their documents.”

    As for the $51 million in advances from 2017, Rachel Johnson — LAHSA’s chief of staff — said that money was meant to buoy service providers through 2027.

    “This allowed the providers to really expand rapidly into the work, as was required by the funding,” Johnson said. Agency officials told auditors their agreement with the county did not require the creation of formal repayment agreements with providers for those advances.

    What will be different moving forward? 

    L.A. County voters just approved a big boost in the funding that LAHSA manages. Starting in April, Measure A will increase sales taxes in the county by a quarter-cent for every dollar spent, with most of that money going to homelessness services overseen by LAHSA.

    Adams Kellum said Measure A already includes new accountability requirements — such as five-year progress reports — that follow the audit’s recommendations.

    “We're in alignment,” she said. “I'm encouraged that these are things we have been working on over the last year and a half.”

    However, the audit could increase scrutiny of LAHSA from L.A. County supervisors and city council members who’ve repeatedly said they feel like the agency is a black box. After being told last year that L.A. taxpayer funds could have been spent on motel room shelters that weren’t actually occupied, Councilmember Bob Blumenfield discussed halting city dollars to the agency due to extensive data problems. Blumenfield chairs the council’s budget committee.

    Councilmember Monica Rodriguez said at the time, “Get me off this merry-go-round from hell.”

    Read the full audit

  • LA fire survivors set to lose case managers
    Two woman stand and pose for a photo in front of a wall with text that reads "CORE. The hub" and an illustration of a town.
    Veda Ashby Romero, left, a disaster case manager for CORE, poses for a portrait with Mary Landau, a fire survivor, at the CORE resource center on Thursday, Oct. 15, 2026, in Altadena.

    Topline:

    A 78-year-old retired teacher whose California home was destroyed by a catastrophic wildfire faces losing her disaster case manager amid a funding standoff between the state and the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

    Why it matters: The program’s early termination is the latest setback for L.A. communities in the middle of recovery and awaiting billions of additional federal dollars. It also highlights how some disaster-impacted communities still face issues like delayed FEMA payments and inconsistent communication, despite President Donald Trump’s administration pledging to streamline processes after long criticizing the agency’s bureaucracy.

    What do case managers do? Trained disaster case managers help people find rental assistance, new employment and money to close the gap between what insurance pays and the actual cost to rebuild. They guide survivors on how to avoid scams, challenge insurance payouts and appeal FEMA decisions.

    Read on... for more on what it means for fire survivors to lose case managers.

    Throughout the arduous process to rebuild the Altadena home where she lived for nearly 50 years, Mary Landau has sometimes felt like giving up. Much of what has sustained her is the encouragement she receives from her disaster case manager.

    “She said, ‘You can do this,’” said Landau, a 78-year-old retired teacher who enjoys studying Altadena history and cannot imagine living anywhere else, even after the Eaton Fire destroyed her house. “She gave me hope and strength.”

    Landau meets weekly with Veda Ashby Romero, a trained recovery expert who helps her navigate insurance, complete online forms and qualify for financial assistance.

    Now Landau is one of roughly 1,400 households affected by the 2025 Los Angeles fires who are set to lose their disaster case managers by the end of October, as a standoff between California and the Federal Emergency Management Agency over the program’s funding drags on.

    The news has rattled Landau. “The safety net has been pulled out from under me, and the hope is not as strong as it was,” she said.

    The program’s early termination is the latest setback for L.A. communities in the middle of recovery and awaiting billions of additional federal dollars. It also highlights how some disaster-impacted communities still face issues like delayed FEMA payments and inconsistent communication, despite President Donald Trump’s administration pledging to streamline processes after long criticizing the agency’s bureaucracy.

    FEMA did not respond to a request for comment but has previously touted the assistance it has provided for the program. The White House says California has mismanaged the crisis.

    Case managers simplify a notoriously opaque recovery process

    Landau kept her insurance policy up to date for the 1938 two-bedroom, one-bathroom ranch home where she raised her three children and tended a wildflower garden. She still faced a shortfall of at least $200,000 to rebuild the modest home and owed $225,000 on her mortgage.

    Ashby Romero supports her through the insurance process — a tedious one that has involved multiple adjusters and required creating an inventory of the half-century’s worth of possessions she lost. She also found Landau a grant to cover a year’s worth of mortgage payments. “I would never have gotten it without her,” Landau said. “I’m very bad with paperwork.”

    Trained disaster case managers help people find rental assistance, new employment and money to close the gap between what insurance pays and the actual cost to rebuild. They guide survivors on how to avoid scams, challenge insurance payouts and appeal FEMA decisions.

    “The recovery process is very complicated, and a lot of the systems are not designed to make it easy for people,” said Matt Gsell, disaster recovery manager at CORE, the nonprofit managing Landau’s case and one of five participating in LA’s case management program.

    Late reimbursements and insufficient funds led California to end the program

    After the January 2025 fires, California requested $28 million for case management. FEMA instead awarded $13.2 million for 24 months, to be paid in four equal installments.

    FEMA can fund disaster case management for presidentially declared major disasters. The money is reimbursed to the state, which usually contracts with one or more nonprofits to administer the program. In the case of an exceptional disaster, states can request extensions for up to 36 months.

    By August, FEMA had made only one of the four payments, leaving the state to front the rest despite “numerous requests” for reimbursement, according to the California Department of Social Services.

    FEMA also had not answered a March request for an additional $6.5 million to sustain the program the full 24 months, in light of high demand. Seven hundred households remain on a waitlist for services.

    California then announced it could no longer float the costs and would shutter the program at the end of October. FEMA eventually reimbursed the outstanding payments but did not give an answer about the additional money.

    Rep. Judy Chu, a Democrat whose district includes Altadena, told The Associated Press that FEMA also had not responded to questions from her office about the additional money. Failing to fund the program the full 24 months “risks abandoning survivors,” Chu said, adding that FEMA should also be prepared to extend the program for longer if needs persist.

    Nonprofits scramble to reassign clients

    With the projected end date looming, nonprofits are triaging open cases and trying to move as many as possible to other organizations that can continue the work using philanthropic dollars.

    But there won’t be enough resources to keep everyone in case management.

    “They are overloaded,” said Bree Jensen, spokesperson for the Eaton Fire Collaborative and an Eaton Fire survivor. “You can’t put everything onto the local nonprofits.”

    The uncertainty is destabilizing, as more than 100 case managers stand to lose their jobs and must weigh whether to seek new work now or wait for answers, Jensen said.

    “We can’t go month to month,” said Gsell. CORE has already closed some of its less severe cases and is trying to transfer 200 of its 450 clients to other nonprofits.

    The case management program is just a small part of the federal support California has requested to recover from fires that destroyed more than 16,000 structures.

    Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, asked Trump, a Republican, and Congress for $15.7 billion, pared down from an earlier request of $33 billion, much of which would go toward rebuilding housing. Trump has not sent the Republican-controlled Congress a supplemental disaster request for the L.A. fires.

    White House spokesperson Lauren Bis said the Trump administration has obligated billions of dollars for L.A.’s recovery.

    Landau is waiting for construction to begin on her new home. She is still wrangling with insurance and a bank to receive her final payment. She and her children lean on each other for support, she said, but pressing on won’t be the same without Ashby Romero.

    “To meet with somebody who cares about you, wants to see that you land on your feet in a good situation,” she said, ”it was so important.”

  • Sponsored message
  • CA filed its 100th lawsuit against Trump
    Attorney General Rob Bonta, a man with medium skin tone, wearing a suit, sits next to an American flag as his head is at the bottom of the frame.
    Attorney General Rob Bonta during the swearing-in ceremony for Senate President pro Tempore Monique Limón in the Senate chambers at the state Capitol in Sacramento on Jan. 5, 2026.

    Topline:

    California Attorney General Rob Bonta has filed the state’s 100th lawsuit against the federal government since President Donald Trump took office for a second time in 2025.

    Why it matters: The lawsuit filed Thursday in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California alleges that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement overstepped its Constitutional limits by taking people into custody at state courthouses, a practice forbidden by a U.S. District Court judge that the lawsuit alleges ICE nevertheless continues to employ.

    The backstory: In September, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed into law a measure that requires federal immigration agents to present a judicial warrant and identify themselves before making arrests within 1,000 feet of a state courthouse.

    Read on... for more on the 100th lawsuit.

    California Attorney General Rob Bonta has filed the state’s 100th lawsuit against the federal government since President Donald Trump took office for a second time in 2025.

    Bonta reached that milestone in 21 months. During the first Trump administration, California officials sued the federal government a total of 123 times in four years.

    The lawsuit filed Thursday in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California alleges that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement overstepped its Constitutional limits by taking people into custody at state courthouses, a practice forbidden by a U.S. District Court judge that the lawsuit alleges ICE nevertheless continues to employ.

    For instance, the California Justice Department found that ICE detained 34 people at state courthouses in June 2026. In July 2026, the month after the judicial order to stop making arrests at courthouses, ICE detained 28 people at courthouses.

    “ICE’s directive on courthouse enforcement and the resulting enforcement activities have had a profound chilling effect that has hindered California’s ability to enforce the law and protect public safety,” the state Justice Department said in a news release.

    Picking people up at a courthouse can have a chilling effect on witnesses, victims and even suspects who are afraid to show up for court, California Supreme Court Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero said last year.

    “Making courthouses a focus of immigration enforcement hinders, rather than helps, the administration of justice by deterring witnesses and victims from coming forward and discouraging individuals from asserting their rights,” Guerrero said.

    In September, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed into law a measure that requires federal immigration agents to present a judicial warrant and identify themselves before making arrests within 1,000 feet of a state courthouse.

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

  • Proposed tax increase to pay for landslide damages
    A resort sits atop the blufftops.
    An aerial view of the Terranea Resort.

    Topline:

    Rancho Palos Verdes is turning to its best-known attraction to pay for landslide-related damages. Come November, voters in the city will be asked to vote on a ballot measure that would raise the tax on overnight guests at Terranea Resort and a small, lesser-known inn.

    Why it matters: Rancho Palos Verdes’ landslide woes have hit the city’s coffers hard. By the end of June 2027, the city will have spent around $75 million just on landslide-related damages over the last three and a half years. Voters in the city are being asked to vote on Measure RS, which would increase the tax overnight hotel guests pay from 10% to 13%. A two-star inn in the city would also be affected if the tax measure passes. If Measure RS passes, it could bring in around $2.2 million annually.

    How we got here: The Portuguese Bend area in Rancho Palos Verdes was once green rolling hills offering spectacular views of the Pacific Ocean and Catalina Island. Now, much of that land is riddled with 20-foot chasms, some spanning 12 feet. For decades, land movement was minimal. But with above-average rainfall in 2022 and 2023, that movement rapidly accelerated — up to 1 foot per week in some places. Land movement has since slowed to about an inch a week, thanks in part to wells the city installed that suck water out of the ground. But damage to the area remains and will likely never be abated.

    RPV has spent a significant amount of money to lessen the erosion.

    Rancho Palos Verdes’ landslide woes have hit the city’s coffers hard. By the end of June 2027, the city will have spent around $75 million just on landslide-related damages over the last three and a half years.

    So now, they are looking at one of the city’s best-known attractions for help: the Terranea Resort. Voters in the city are being asked to vote in November on Measure RS, which would increase the tax overnight hotel guests pay from 10% to 13%.

    A two-star inn in the city would also be affected if the tax measure passes.

    How would the tax help?

    If Measure RS passes, it could bring in around $2.2 million annually.

    “We reached out to Terranea as we were exploring different revenue streams and talked to them about the possibility of increasing the [transient occupancy tax] from 10% to 13%,” said Ara Mihranian, the city manager. “We looked at comparables of similar resort hotels in the greater Los Angeles area and Orange County that are generally their competitors or similar establishments to see where they ranked. And Terranea was below the market rate in terms of the transient occupancy tax.”

    The 102-acre resort sits on bluffs along the coast overlooking the Pacific Ocean and offers guests casitas, villas and rooms that start at $350 and can exceed $1,500 during peak seasons.

    A spokesperson for Terranea Resort declined to comment for this story.

    How we got here

    The Portuguese Bend area in Rancho Palos Verdes was once green rolling hills offering spectacular views of the Pacific Ocean and Catalina Island. Now, much of that land is riddled with 20-foot chasms, some spanning 12 feet.

    For decades, land movement was minimal. But with above-average rainfall in 2022 and 2023, that movement rapidly accelerated — up to 1 foot per week in some places. Land movement has since slowed to about an inch a week, thanks in part to wells the city installed that suck water out of the ground. But damage to the area remains and will likely never be abated.

    RPV has spent a significant amount of money to lessen the erosion.

    Mihranian said the city has filled fissures in the landslide area, installed protective lining in the canyons and has checked all the deep dewatering wells to make sure they can pump water out of the ground so it cannot collect and cause land movement — especially important ahead of El Niño.

    “We're also making sure that the wells and the generators that support and energize the wells are encased and housed so that in the event of extreme weather, they are protected from any elements,” he said.

    The city has also installed pipes along the main road through the landslide complex so that, instead of flooding the road, water will be diverted to the ocean.

    Still, even if the measure passes, the $2.2 million annually will still not cover all landslide-related costs. A spokesperson told LAist the city is still “aggressively” pursuing grants to cover mounting costs.

  • Protests across SoCal to focus on the midterms
    A demonstrator holds a sign during a "No Kings" protest, Saturday, June 14, 2025, in Atlanta.
    A demonstrator holds a sign during a "No Kings" protest, Saturday, June 14, 2025, in Atlanta.
    Topline:
    "No Kings" protests are returning for a fourth round Saturday, Oct. 17.
    Why now? This time, the focus is on the November midterms and getting people prepared to vote. Previous protests had drawn large crowds.

    Read on ... to find details and information.

    "No Kings" protests are returning for a fourth round Saturday, Oct. 17.

    This time, the focus is on the November midterms and getting people prepared to vote. Previous protests had drawn large crowds.

    "We expect tens of thousands of people to attend the various No Kings rallies throughout the greater Los Angeles area, and we would not be surprised to see tens of thousands at the downtown rally itself," said Nick Miller, a press coordinator with 50501 SoCal, a partnering organization.

    That protest is taking place at 1 p.m. at Gloria Molina Grand Park.

    LAPD said they are aware of the rally and don’t anticipate any issues.

    Pasadena, Long Beach and Riverside are also holding rallies.

    Where are they happening in SoCal?

    • Burbank: 10 a.m. to noon at Abraham Lincoln Park
    • Culver City: 11 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. at Culver City Hall
    • Downtown L.A.: 1 to 5 p.m. at Gloria Molina Grand Park
    • Fontana: 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. at Seville Park
    • Huntington Beach: 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. at Huntington Beach Pier
    • Irvine: 3. to 5 p.m. at Trabuco Center
    • Pasadena: 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. at Colorado Boulevard and Fair Oaks Avenue
    • Riverside: 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. at Market Street and University Avenue
    • Santa Clarita: 9 a.m. to noon at Valencia Boulevard and McBean Parkway
    • Torrance: 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. at Torrance City Hall
    • Whittier: 12:30 to 2 p.m. at Whittier City Hall